![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
The rear passenger side brake/turn signal bulb has burned out in my wife's 1997 Buick LeSabre Custom (3.8 V6). The manual says to pull the carpet away from the area of the tail lamp assembly, then turn the bulb holder assembly to remove it. However, it seems that the design is different from that described in the manual. If I pull back the carpet it looks as iff the only way to get at the bulb holder is to remove two nuts and pull the whole lamp assembly off the rear of the vehicle. Is this the way to change a simple bulb? Am I missing something here? Cal. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Cal" <Replyto (AT) group (DOT) pls> wrote in news:VMAff.234$fO5.142 (AT) newssvr33 (DOT) news.prodigy.com: Just did one on my wife's 2000 LeSabre. Same deal. It's what happens when things are designed by engineers that can't/don't replace their own lightbulbs. |
|
The rear passenger side brake/turn signal bulb has burned out in my wife's 1997 Buick LeSabre Custom (3.8 V6). The manual says to pull the carpet away from the area of the tail lamp assembly, then turn the bulb holder assembly to remove it. However, it seems that the design is different from that described in the manual. If I pull back the carpet it looks as iff the only way to get at the bulb holder is to remove two nuts and pull the whole lamp assembly off the rear of the vehicle. Is this the way to change a simple bulb? Am I missing something here? Cal. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Al Tsiemers" <Al.Tsiemers (AT) IForgot (DOT) net> wrote in message news:Xns97136317095A16666 (AT) 69 (DOT) 28.186.121... "Cal" <Replyto (AT) group (DOT) pls> wrote in news:VMAff.234$fO5.142 (AT) newssvr33 (DOT) news.prodigy.com: Just did one on my wife's 2000 LeSabre. Same deal. It's what happens when things are designed by engineers that can't/don't replace their own lightbulbs. Maybe, but in years past, when bulbs were easier to get to, the lenses often had water in them and the sockets corroded easily. They are infinitely better today. |
|
The rear passenger side brake/turn signal bulb has burned out in my wife's 1997 Buick LeSabre Custom (3.8 V6). The manual says to pull the carpet away from the area of the tail lamp assembly, then turn the bulb holder assembly to remove it. However, it seems that the design is different from that described in the manual. If I pull back the carpet it looks as iff the only way to get at the bulb holder is to remove two nuts and pull the whole lamp assembly off the rear of the vehicle. Is this the way to change a simple bulb? Am I missing something here? Cal. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Hairy" <hairy (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:3uacc1F1050ueU1 (AT) individual (DOT) net... "Al Tsiemers" <Al.Tsiemers (AT) IForgot (DOT) net> wrote in message news:Xns97136317095A16666 (AT) 69 (DOT) 28.186.121... "Cal" <Replyto (AT) group (DOT) pls> wrote in news:VMAff.234$fO5.142 (AT) newssvr33 (DOT) news.prodigy.com: Just did one on my wife's 2000 LeSabre. Same deal. It's what happens when things are designed by engineers that can't/don't replace their own lightbulbs. Maybe, but in years past, when bulbs were easier to get to, the lenses often had water in them and the sockets corroded easily. They are infinitely better today. Correct. And... it's not that hard to get the tail light assembly out. It's really quite obvious with a quick look. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Mike Marlow" <mmarlowREMOVE (AT) alltel (DOT) net> wrote in news:86a5e$43800e7c $45289579$7257 (AT) ALLTEL (DOT) NET: Give me a break. Same sockets they've used for 15 years. Like they can't design a lens to drain moisture. His original complaint was about the changing of a 2 minute, toolless job into a 15 minute job requiring a flare wrench or deep socket. |
|
"Hairy" <hairy (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:3uacc1F1050ueU1 (AT) individual (DOT) net... "Al Tsiemers" <Al.Tsiemers (AT) IForgot (DOT) net> wrote in message news:Xns97136317095A16666 (AT) 69 (DOT) 28.186.121... "Cal" <Replyto (AT) group (DOT) pls> wrote in news:VMAff.234$fO5.142 (AT) newssvr33 (DOT) news.prodigy.com: Just did one on my wife's 2000 LeSabre. Same deal. It's what happens when things are designed by engineers that can't/don't replace their own lightbulbs. Maybe, but in years past, when bulbs were easier to get to, the lenses often had water in them and the sockets corroded easily. They are infinitely better today. Correct. And... it's not that hard to get the tail light assembly out. It's really quite obvious with a quick look. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
| What do you mean "give me a break", Al? My only point was that the assemblies today *are* better than what they used to use and it's not a huge job to replace a bulb. Sure - they could have put a cut out in there so you could just reach in and twist out or pull out the offending bulb, but come on - it's not that big of a deal to take off a nut. 15 minutes would be quite on the long side of that job. I supposed if you stopped for a cigaretter or maybe a little... well, we won't go there. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Al Tsiemers" <Al.Tsiemers (AT) IForgot (DOT) net> wrote in message news:Xns9714A0CCC99B6666 (AT) 69 (DOT) 28.186.121... "Mike Marlow" <mmarlowREMOVE (AT) alltel (DOT) net> wrote in news:86a5e$43800e7c $45289579$7257 (AT) ALLTEL (DOT) NET: Give me a break. Same sockets they've used for 15 years. Like they can't design a lens to drain moisture. His original complaint was about the changing of a 2 minute, toolless job into a 15 minute job requiring a flare wrench or deep socket. What do you mean "give me a break", Al? My only point was that the assemblies today *are* better than what they used to use and it's not a huge job to replace a bulb. Sure - they could have put a cut out in there so you could just reach in and twist out or pull out the offending bulb, but come on - it's not that big of a deal to take off a nut. 15 minutes would be quite on the long side of that job. I supposed if you stopped for a cigaretter or maybe a little... well, we won't go there. |

#9
| |||
| |||
|
| Mike Marlow wrote: "Al Tsiemers" <Al.Tsiemers (AT) IForgot (DOT) net> wrote in message news:Xns9714A0CCC99B6666 (AT) 69 (DOT) 28.186.121... "Mike Marlow" <mmarlowREMOVE (AT) alltel (DOT) net> wrote in news:86a5e$43800e7c $45289579$7257 (AT) ALLTEL (DOT) NET: Give me a break. Same sockets they've used for 15 years. Like they can't design a lens to drain moisture. His original complaint was about the changing of a 2 minute, toolless job into a 15 minute job requiring a flare wrench or deep socket. What do you mean "give me a break", Al? My only point was that the assemblies today *are* better than what they used to use and it's not a huge job to replace a bulb. Sure - they could have put a cut out in there so you could just reach in and twist out or pull out the offending bulb, but come on - it's not that big of a deal to take off a nut. 15 minutes would be quite on the long side of that job. I supposed if you stopped for a cigaretter or maybe a little... well, we won't go there. Hi... Just the next step on the greed driven throwaway world path of big business. Next, someone somewhere will raise a stink about the crazing/fogging of the interior, and before we know it we'll be fixing a burned out bulb by replacing a 300 dollar headlamp "module". It goes without saying that replacing this module will require special tools ![]() Take care. Ken |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Ken Weitzel" <kweitzel (AT) shaw (DOT) ca> wrote in message news:Slbgf.555569$1i.139953 (AT) pd7tw2no (DOT) .. Mike Marlow wrote: "Al Tsiemers" <Al.Tsiemers (AT) IForgot (DOT) net> wrote in message news:Xns9714A0CCC99B6666 (AT) 69 (DOT) 28.186.121... "Mike Marlow" <mmarlowREMOVE (AT) alltel (DOT) net> wrote in news:86a5e$43800e7c $45289579$7257 (AT) ALLTEL (DOT) NET: Give me a break. Same sockets they've used for 15 years. Like they can't design a lens to drain moisture. His original complaint was about the changing of a 2 minute, toolless job into a 15 minute job requiring a flare wrench or deep socket. What do you mean "give me a break", Al? My only point was that the assemblies today *are* better than what they used to use and it's not a huge job to replace a bulb. Sure - they could have put a cut out in there so you could just reach in and twist out or pull out the offending bulb, but come on - it's not that big of a deal to take off a nut. 15 minutes would be quite on the long side of that job. I supposed if you stopped for a cigaretter or maybe a little... well, we won't go there. Hi... Just the next step on the greed driven throwaway world path of big business. Next, someone somewhere will raise a stink about the crazing/fogging of the interior, and before we know it we'll be fixing a burned out bulb by replacing a 300 dollar headlamp "module". It goes without saying that replacing this module will require special tools ![]() Take care. Ken Which raises a good point Ken. The other day I had to change a parking light in my 98 Regal. I didn't know the bulb was gone until I was driving down the road and the flasher was running at double speed. So - I pulled into the local Advance Auto and picked up an 1147. In the old days I would either have had to get down on my knees in the parking lot to reach up under the fender (never a clean job), or grab a phillips or a torex driver to take the lens off. Neither approach are terribly difficult but one is dirty and the other requires that I have the right tool with me. Instead, now all I had to do was slide two plastic retainer slides down about 1/2 inch and pull out the headlamp module which gave me clear and easy access to replace the bulb. Put it back in place, slide the plastic slides back in that lock it down and head down the highway. Every bulb for the front end of the car is contained within the headlamp module, and access could not be easier. To the OP's point, if the rear module was secured in a similar manner to what the headlamp module is, then it too could be a completely tool-less maintenance point. It does require a socket to remove the nut that secures it. I just don't consider that to be such a big deal. For those to whom the use of a socket is a major affront, I would suggest getting a wingnut and replacing the factory nut with the wing nut. That'll take care of that socket wrench issue. My daughter's old '94 Sunbird used finger nuts to secure the tail lamp modules. One could get ahold of a couple of those and use them in place of the Buick factory hex nut too. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |