LX EX SE

Hello

Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and
lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?

In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.

Thank you

"jamie" <me2 (AT) privacy (DOT) net.invalid> wrote

Hello

Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and
lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?

In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.

Thank you

Are we talking about options or standard features? Assuming you mean
standard features (even though you said options), I think it depends on the
model and the year. For example, in 2000, the order in the case of the
Accord (fewest features to most) is LX - SE - EX. But that's a little
misleading, since the SE that year (I own one) was essentially an LX with a
discounted option package that included air conditioning, some interior
trim, and a few other things. And then there was the DX, at the bottom of
the line.

My understanding is that in at least some other years, the SE was the top of
the line in terms of features. Maybe someone else can tell you for sure; the
2000 is the only Accord I've owned.

Not sure about other car models (Civic, etc.). I know there have been LX and
EX versions of the Civic, but I don't recall ever seeing a Civic SE.

Paul

"Paul" <pkmueller (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net> wrote in
news:8uOZh.4711$uJ6.885 (AT) newssvr17 (DOT) news.prodigy.net:

"jamie" <me2 (AT) privacy (DOT) net.invalid> wrote in message
news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2 (AT) authen (DOT) puce.readfreenews.net...
Hello

Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is
second and lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?

In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.

Thank you

Are we talking about options or standard features? Assuming
you mean standard features (even though you said options), I
think it depends on the model and the year. For example, in
2000, the order in the case of the Accord (fewest features to
most) is LX - SE - EX. But that's a little misleading, since
the SE that year (I own one) was essentially an LX with a
discounted option package that included air conditioning, some
interior trim, and a few other things. And then there was the
DX, at the bottom of the line.

My understanding is that in at least some other years, the SE
was the top of the line in terms of features. Maybe someone
else can tell you for sure; the 2000 is the only Accord I've
owned.

Not sure about other car models (Civic, etc.). I know there
have been LX and EX versions of the Civic, but I don't recall
ever seeing a Civic SE.

Paul

Great. Thanks so much for the information!

On Tue, 1 May 2007 16:37:29 -0500, "Paul" <pkmueller (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net>
wrote:

"jamie" <me2 (AT) privacy (DOT) net.invalid> wrote in message
news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2 (AT) authen (DOT) puce.readfreenews.net...
Hello

Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and
lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?

In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.

Thank you

Are we talking about options or standard features? Assuming you mean
standard features (even though you said options), I think it depends on the
model and the year. For example, in 2000, the order in the case of the
Accord (fewest features to most) is LX - SE - EX. But that's a little
misleading, since the SE that year (I own one) was essentially an LX with a
discounted option package that included air conditioning, some interior
trim, and a few other things. And then there was the DX, at the bottom of
the line.

My understanding is that in at least some other years, the SE was the top of
the line in terms of features. Maybe someone else can tell you for sure; the
2000 is the only Accord I've owned.

Not sure about other car models (Civic, etc.). I know there have been LX and
EX versions of the Civic, but I don't recall ever seeing a Civic SE.

What he said.

Used to be a DX model too, below the LX.

Now we have:
http://automobiles.honda.com/models/...e=Accord+Sedan

Starting
MSRP Trim
Level

$18,625
Value Package

$20,125
LX

$20,825
Special Edition

$22,550
EX

$23,350
SE V-6

$25,200
LX V-6

$27,400
EX-L V-6 6MT

$27,400
EX-L V-6

So there's SE, and "Value Package". They no longer put LX/EX/SE
badges on the fender, so they can change the SE offer any time they
want.

J.

"Paul" <pkmueller (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net> wrote

"jamie" <me2 (AT) privacy (DOT) net.invalid> wrote in message
news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2 (AT) authen (DOT) puce.readfreenews.net...
Hello

Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and
lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?

In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.

Thank you

Are we talking about options or standard features? Assuming you mean
standard features (even though you said options), I think it depends on
the model and the year. For example, in 2000, the order in the case of the
Accord (fewest features to most) is LX - SE - EX. But that's a little
misleading, since the SE that year (I own one) was essentially an LX with
a discounted option package that included air conditioning, some interior
trim, and a few other things. And then there was the DX, at the bottom of
the line.

My understanding is that in at least some other years, the SE was the top
of the line in terms of features. Maybe someone else can tell you for
sure; the 2000 is the only Accord I've owned.

Not sure about other car models (Civic, etc.). I know there have been LX
and EX versions of the Civic, but I don't recall ever seeing a Civic SE.

Paul

One thing I forgot to mention is that, in 2000 at least, some of the SE
models were built in Japan. The SE came in three colors: red, dark green and
bronze. As far as I can tell (based on my shopping experiences in the
Atlanta area), all the red ones were made in Japan and all the green and
bronze ones were made in Ohio. I was never able to find out why, and I have
no idea which other models/years are of Japanese origin. As far as I know,
most if not all Accords now sold in the U.S. are built in this country.

On Wed, 2 May 2007 10:54:49 -0500, "Paul" <pkmueller (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net>
wrote:

One thing I forgot to mention is that, in 2000 at least, some of the SE
models were built in Japan. The SE came in three colors: red, dark green and
bronze. As far as I can tell (based on my shopping experiences in the
Atlanta area), all the red ones were made in Japan and all the green and
bronze ones were made in Ohio. I was never able to find out why, and I have
no idea which other models/years are of Japanese origin. As far as I know,
most if not all Accords now sold in the U.S. are built in this country.

No.

I think it's possible all or most of the V6's are made in the US, but
I believe last year the I4's were made in Japan, at least those
available on the west coast - at least mine!

J.

"JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R (AT) gte (DOT) net> wrote

On Wed, 2 May 2007 10:54:49 -0500, "Paul" <pkmueller (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net
wrote:

One thing I forgot to mention is that, in 2000 at least, some of the SE
models were built in Japan. The SE came in three colors: red, dark green
and
bronze. As far as I can tell (based on my shopping experiences in the
Atlanta area), all the red ones were made in Japan and all the green and
bronze ones were made in Ohio. I was never able to find out why, and I
have
no idea which other models/years are of Japanese origin. As far as I know,
most if not all Accords now sold in the U.S. are built in this country.

No.

I think it's possible all or most of the V6's are made in the US, but
I believe last year the I4's were made in Japan, at least those
available on the west coast - at least mine!

J.
According to a Honda fact sheet available online, all Accord coupes are made

in North America. That would include four-cylinder models. The same fact
sheet says some Accord sedans are made in Marysville, Ohio. And another
Honda site says the Honda engine plant in Anna, Ohio, makes four-cylinder
engines for Accords, among other models. All of which leads me to believe
that at least some four-cylinder Accords are still being made in the U.S.
It's possible some are being imported from Japan, especially to the west
coast. That might make sense, depending on transportation costs and other
factors.

Not that any of this particularly matters.

jamie <me2 (AT) privacy (DOT) net.invalid> wrote in news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2
@authen.puce.readfreenews.net:

Hello

Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and
lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?

In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.

Thank you

Which model?

For Accords, it's LX SE EX generally

For CR-V's LX EX SE

Nobody wrote:

jamie <me2 (AT) privacy (DOT) net.invalid> wrote in news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2
@authen.puce.readfreenews.net:

Hello

Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and
lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?

In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.

Thank you

Which model?

For Accords, it's LX SE EX generally

For CR-V's LX EX SE

For Accords, it depends on the model year. On the 1991 and 1993 Accords, SE
was the top model.

In article <Xns992F11947603AIDTOKENnobodyIDTOKEN (AT) 66 (DOT) 250.146.128>,
nobody (AT) nowhere (DOT) com says...

jamie <me2 (AT) privacy (DOT) net.invalid> wrote in news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2
@authen.puce.readfreenews.net:

Hello

Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and
lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?

In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.

Thank you

Which model?

For Accords, it's LX SE EX generally

Don't forget the "VP" (Value Package) which replaced the true low end
model, the DX.

--Gene