![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
|
Michael Pardee wrote: "Broderick Crawford" <bcrawford2150 (AT) roadrunner (DOT) com> wrote in message news:46524ea6$0$4873$4c368faf (AT) roadrunner (DOT) com... Useful Info wrote: Read all about it, here: http://Muvy.org Don't worry, the US will ban it. They do not want to sell less oil. What on earth makes you think that? Zero consumption vehicles, like bicycles, are popular and encouraged in the US. I have owned several myself over nearly half a century and have never encountered a "not enough oil" goon squad. The consumption would not be an issue, but crash-worthiness and emissions are showstoppers. ZEV and P-ZEV vehicles are in great demand by regulators, especially in California, but AFAIK diesels are still not available in passenger cars there because of the emissions. The safety info in the referenced article is not encouraging either; side impact standards (mandatory in the US) appear to be lacking: "as safe as a GT sports car registered for racing". That's damning with faint praise; if they could say it met US safety standards they certainly would have said so. Fuel economy really doesn't matter to grieving families. Mike Fuck safety, Drive right and you won't need it. Safety is just a protection scheme invented by the American car companies to keep out the competition. They WILL NOT make fuel efficient vehicles. Hybrids should get over 100mpg by rights. Americans don't make a single car that gets 50mpg. Europe makes several, every car company makes 2 or 3 that get 50 to 80mpg. Diesel hybrids get 120 to 150mpg. The US will avoid these. Give me a choice, my motorcycle don't have air bags, seat belts or crash test and works just fine. I want a car WITHOUT seat belts and air bags. I want to choose my safety devices, I don't want you to. We don't need forced communist compliance at all. Interesting thread for a Honda site, like who cares. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |