![]() | |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
Is there anyone with either carfax.com or autocheck.com service right now that could run one check for me? Please email me. I will pass your favor along to someone else somehow. Thank you. |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Elle" <honda.lioness (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:373440f4-8ddb-4486-9c00-2be6d7b7879f (AT) r36g2000vbn (DOT) googlegroups.com... Is there anyone with either carfax.com or autocheck.com service right now that could run one check for me? Please email me. I will pass your favor along to someone else somehow. Thank you. Up here in Canada, we have a show called Marketplace. They did a story on Carfax and showed how inadequate it is. I concur with the other posters that suggest a physical inspection is the only way to go. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:27:07 -0500, Iowna Uass<iownauass (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: "Elle"<honda.lioness (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:373440f4-8ddb-4486-9c00-2be6d7b7879f (AT) r36g2000vbn (DOT) googlegroups.com... Is there anyone with either carfax.com or autocheck.com service right now that could run one check for me? Please email me. I will pass your favor along to someone else somehow. Thank you. Up here in Canada, we have a show called Marketplace. They did a story on Carfax and showed how inadequate it is. I concur with the other posters that suggest a physical inspection is the only way to go. Both are the way to go. Learning wether a car was used as a rental car or totaled in an accident can be invaluable information. |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 09/25/2009 07:46 AM, AZ Nomad wrote: On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:27:07 -0500, Iowna Uass<iownauass (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: "Elle"<honda.lioness (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:373440f4-8ddb-4486-9c00-2be6d7b7879f (AT) r36g2000vbn (DOT) googlegroups.com... Is there anyone with either carfax.com or autocheck.com service right now that could run one check for me? Please email me. I will pass your favor along to someone else somehow. Thank you. Up here in Canada, we have a show called Marketplace. They did a story on Carfax and showed how inadequate it is. I concur with the other posters that suggest a physical inspection is the only way to go. Both are the way to go. Learning wether a car was used as a rental car or totaled in an accident can be invaluable information. nope. rental cars can be abused, or they can be well maintained. "totaled" can be physically utterly trivial depending on what the insurance company deemed value to be at the time. relying on anything other than physical inspection is an exercise in self-deception and gullibility to advertising.. |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:11:54 -0700, jim beam <me (AT) privacy (DOT) net> wrote: On 09/25/2009 07:46 AM, AZ Nomad wrote: On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:27:07 -0500, Iowna Uass<iownauass (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: "Elle"<honda.lioness (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:373440f4-8ddb-4486-9c00-2be6d7b7879f (AT) r36g2000vbn (DOT) googlegroups.com... Is there anyone with either carfax.com or autocheck.com service right now that could run one check for me? Please email me. I will pass your favor along to someone else somehow. Thank you. Up here in Canada, we have a show called Marketplace. They did a story on Carfax and showed how inadequate it is. I concur with the other posters that suggest a physical inspection is the only way to go. Both are the way to go. Learning wether a car was used as a rental car or totaled in an accident can be invaluable information. nope. rental cars can be abused, or they can be well maintained. "totaled" can be physically utterly trivial depending on what the insurance company deemed value to be at the time. relying on anything other than physical inspection is an exercise in self-deception and gullibility to advertising.. It is still useful information. Would you want a car that passed inspection with a glowing report that had been totaled previously? |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
Both are the way to go. *Learning wether a car was used as a rental car or totaled in an accident can be invaluable information. |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
AZ Nomad <aznoma... (AT) PremoveOBthisOX (DOT) COM> wrote: Both are the way to go. *Learning wether a car was used as a rental car or totaled in an accident can be invaluable information. I agree with robb, Leftie and you. To share experience for the archives, about a year ago when I was looking at Craig's List cars, the Carfax report showed that about one-third had had odometer tampering. Many also had a salvage title. This information was not being disclosed by the sellers. Also, a salvage title is important not because it is a clue to look for damage, a non-straight frame, etc. A salvage title is important because it means the car will not be fully insurable for damage to it in the future, regardless of the extent of repairs to the car in the past, because some insurance company somewhere has already paid out on the car for its full value. |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
Elle wrote: AZ Nomad <aznoma... (AT) PremoveOBthisOX (DOT) COM> wrote: Just to counterpoint a bit, a friend just backed out of buying a 2002 Camry with very low mileage, because Carfax showed an 'odometer discrepancy'. It appears now that there was none. Most likely an inspection station wrote down the wrong number. So heck, you really can't even trust them 100% when they appear to find a problem... |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
AZ Nomad <aznoma... (AT) PremoveOBthisOX (DOT) COM> wrote: Both are the way to go. Learning wether a car was used as a rental car or totaled in an accident can be invaluable information. I agree with robb, Leftie and you. To share experience for the archives, about a year ago when I was looking at Craig's List cars, the Carfax report showed that about one-third had had odometer tampering. Many also had a salvage title. This information was not being disclosed by the sellers. Also, a salvage title is important not because it is a clue to look for damage, a non-straight frame, etc. A salvage title is important because it means the car will not be fully insurable for damage to it in the future, regardless of the extent of repairs to the car in the past, because some insurance company somewhere has already paid out on the car for its full value. |
#20
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:11:54 -0700, jim beam<me (AT) privacy (DOT) net> wrote: On 09/25/2009 07:46 AM, AZ Nomad wrote: On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:27:07 -0500, Iowna Uass<iownauass (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: "Elle"<honda.lioness (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:373440f4-8ddb-4486-9c00-2be6d7b7879f (AT) r36g2000vbn (DOT) googlegroups.com... Is there anyone with either carfax.com or autocheck.com service right now that could run one check for me? Please email me. I will pass your favor along to someone else somehow. Thank you. Up here in Canada, we have a show called Marketplace. They did a story on Carfax and showed how inadequate it is. I concur with the other posters that suggest a physical inspection is the only way to go. Both are the way to go. Learning wether a car was used as a rental car or totaled in an accident can be invaluable information. nope. rental cars can be abused, or they can be well maintained. "totaled" can be physically utterly trivial depending on what the insurance company deemed value to be at the time. relying on anything other than physical inspection is an exercise in self-deception and gullibility to advertising.. It is still useful information. Would you want a car that passed inspection with a glowing report that had been totaled previously? |
|
I do both. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |