![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
| |||
| |||
|
|
Jim Yanik <jyanik (AT) abuse (DOT) gov.> wrote in news:Xns966963506AD29jyanikkuanet (AT) 129 (DOT) 250.170.86: "TeGGeR®" <tegger (AT) tegger (DOT) c0m> wrote in news:Xns9668EF412B3E6tegger (AT) 207 (DOT) 14.113.17: Randolph <trash (AT) junkmail (DOT) com> wrote in news:429D4577.2B7930FB (AT) junkmail (DOT) com: The data sheet shows the diode between emitter and collector. So then it wouldn't make much sense to try and show it. Randolph, I'm having trouble understanding the current path through the transistor. I found this page: http://nobelprize.org/physics/educational/transistor/function/thegame. h tml It helps me understand more, but I don't get which way the current goes through the base electrode. I have a suspicion that my diagrams show the current going the wrong way through the transistor. http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/igniter-operation/index.html There's two current paths;the B-E path and the C-E path(main path). Current flows the opposite direction of the emitter arrow,for both base and collector currents. I'm having trouble getting my mind around this. I am aware that "flow" is _commonly_ considered to be from the positive to negative terminals of the battery, but the electrons themselves go in the OTHER direction. |
|
http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/igniter-operation/index.html http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/igniter-operation/badigniter.html On these two pages, is the current flow through the transistors correctly depicted? Nobody has answered that question yet. |
#32
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <Xns96699C7F9EAA2tegger (AT) 207 (DOT) 14.113.17>, "TeGGeR®" <tegger (AT) tegger (DOT) c0m> wrote: I'm having trouble getting my mind around this. I am aware that "flow" is _commonly_ considered to be from the positive to negative terminals of the battery, but the electrons themselves go in the OTHER direction. Most materials have an electron flow, which goes from negative to positive. I've heard that some materials can have a proton flow. Both may exist in a vacuum. Current flow arrows on diagrams go from positive to negative. Bipolar transistors are current amplifiers. When a current flows through the base-emitter diode junction, a stronger current is allowed to flow from the collector to the emitter. |
#33
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <Xns96699C7F9EAA2tegger (AT) 207 (DOT) 14.113.17>, "TeGGeR®" <tegger (AT) tegger (DOT) c0m> wrote: Jim Yanik <jyanik (AT) abuse (DOT) gov.> wrote in news:Xns966963506AD29jyanikkuanet (AT) 129 (DOT) 250.170.86: "TeGGeR®" <tegger (AT) tegger (DOT) c0m> wrote in news:Xns9668EF412B3E6tegger (AT) 207 (DOT) 14.113.17: Randolph <trash (AT) junkmail (DOT) com> wrote in news:429D4577.2B7930FB (AT) junkmail (DOT) com: The data sheet shows the diode between emitter and collector. So then it wouldn't make much sense to try and show it. Randolph, I'm having trouble understanding the current path through the transistor. I found this page: http://nobelprize.org/physics/educational/transistor/function/thegame. h tml It helps me understand more, but I don't get which way the current goes through the base electrode. I have a suspicion that my diagrams show the current going the wrong way through the transistor. http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/igniter-operation/index.html There's two current paths;the B-E path and the C-E path(main path). Current flows the opposite direction of the emitter arrow,for both base and collector currents. I'm having trouble getting my mind around this. I am aware that "flow" is _commonly_ considered to be from the positive to negative terminals of the battery, but the electrons themselves go in the OTHER direction. Most materials have an electron flow, which goes from negative to positive. I've heard that some materials can have a proton flow. |
|
Both may exist in a vacuum. Current flow arrows on diagrams go from positive to negative. Bipolar transistors are current amplifiers. When a current flows through the base-emitter diode junction, a stronger current is allowed to flow from the collector to the emitter. The C-E junction is .2 to .4 volts when the B-E junction is saturated (~.65 V). The current gain for a power transistor is usually 10 to 100. Darlington pairs have that gain squared. Gains are not at all consistent so they're usually specified as a range. MOSFETs are tiny voltage controlled amplifiers. Absolutely zero static current is required to turn them on or off; just the capacitance current. Because of their infinite current gain, millions may be paralleled on a single chip to satisfy any current load. Their voltage gain is very low - a typical gate threshold voltage is 4V and a typical gate saturation voltage is 10V. There's no voltage drop between the source and drain, only resistance. High voltage capability makes each MOSFET junction larger and dramatically increases resistance. IGBTs are similar to bipolar transistors but with an insulated gate like a MOSFET. They have the high voltage capacity of bipolars but need no driving current like a MOSFET. They're very slow so they're usually limited to controlling industrial motors. (Honda hybrid cars use them for their motors.) http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/igniter-operation/index.html http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/igniter-operation/badigniter.html On these two pages, is the current flow through the transistors correctly depicted? Nobody has answered that question yet. |
#34
| |||
| |||
|
|
Jim Yanik <jyanik (AT) abuse (DOT) gov.> wrote in news:Xns9669BF9265BD5jyanikkuanet (AT) 129 (DOT) 250.170.83: The electrons are what's doing the moving,and they flow from neg to pos. The electrons flow from POSITIVE TO NEGATIVE. The electrons go from where they are (-) to where they're not: The "holes" (+). http://nobelprize.org/physics/educational/transistor/function/forward.h tml It's the actual everyday signal that's commonly perceived to go from negative to positive. But we have THREE paths in a transistor ("transfer resistor"). For a non- techie, this is non-intuitive. I do not get how TWO terminals can have THREE paths. |
|
Please try to understand that I am not trying to be difficult, but that this is not at all making sense to me. I am hoping that someone, somewhere, will post with an explanation that makes sense to my mind. In my professional life I have taught and trained many, many individuals, and most have had certain things that just would not "click" until the information was presented a certain way. I am seeking that way, and I will persist until I find it. This is driving me crazy. This graphic: http://nobelprize.org/physics/educational/transistor/function/amplifica tion .html (all on one line; copy-and-paste as necessary) shows the signal path from base electrode to collector. This one: http://nobelprize.org/physics/educational/transistor/function/pointsymb ol.h tml (again, all on one line) appears to show the path from emitter to collector. I do not get this and I am trying madly to understand. Graham W would be able to correct me in an instant. He has been the most persnicketly critical observer and the most productive from my point of view. Graham, where aaaaaare you?... Graham was the ONLY one to suggest alterations to the Main Relay function graphics. Graham was the ONLY one to inform me of certain HTML errors, the correction of which make it easier for browsers to display the intended information. Ah, but wait. I just thought of something: alt.electronics. Back soon... |
#35
| |||
| |||
|
|
think of a Y water pipe.One arm of the Y is smaller than the other.But the total water flow thru the bottom of the Y divides and part passes thru the left arm and part thru the right arm.You can control how much water passes thru the right arm by adjusting the flow thru the left arm.(but the water pipe does not have any current gain) |
#36
| |||
| |||
|
|
Jim Yanik <jyanik (AT) abuse (DOT) gov.> wrote in news:Xns966A6FCED7938jyanikkuanet (AT) 129 (DOT) 250.170.86: think of a Y water pipe.One arm of the Y is smaller than the other.But the total water flow thru the bottom of the Y divides and part passes thru the left arm and part thru the right arm.You can control how much water passes thru the right arm by adjusting the flow thru the left arm.(but the water pipe does not have any current gain) So then my drawings are NOT correct. I need to show the emitter (closest to the coil) "switched off", and not the collector (farthest from the coil). Right? Or does it matter since the effect is the same? |
#37
| |||
| |||
|
|
Jim Yanik <jyanik (AT) abuse (DOT) gov.> wrote in news:Xns966A6FCED7938jyanikkuanet (AT) 129 (DOT) 250.170.86: think of a Y water pipe.One arm of the Y is smaller than the other.But the total water flow thru the bottom of the Y divides and part passes thru the left arm and part thru the right arm.You can control how much water passes thru the right arm by adjusting the flow thru the left arm.(but the water pipe does not have any current gain) So then my drawings are NOT correct. I need to show the emitter (closest to the coil) "switched off", and not the collector (farthest from the coil). Right? Or does it matter since the effect is the same? -- TeGGeR® The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
#38
| |||
| |||
|
|
For a NPN transistor,the collector should go to the coil,and the emitter to ground. The other end of the coil goes to +12V. The internal diode shunts the back EMF around the transistor to ground,protecting the transistor. I just looked at your schematic,and it appears correct.except that terminal 3 of the Igniter module does not go straight to the Darlington base,it goes to the IC that controls the Darlington.You need a rectangle indicating the control IC between the Pin 3 and the Darlington base.Pin 1(tach drive) probably goes to the control IC,too,certainly not to ground,Pin 4. (the emitter of the Darlington probably goes to the control IC,too,then thru a small value resistor[<1 ohm] for current monitoring by the IC,then to ground.) |
#39
| |||
| |||
|
|
Jim Yanik <jyanik (AT) abuse (DOT) gov.> wrote in news:Xns966AD818247EBjyanikkuanet (AT) 129 (DOT) 250.170.85: For a NPN transistor,the collector should go to the coil,and the emitter to ground. The other end of the coil goes to +12V. The internal diode shunts the back EMF around the transistor to ground,protecting the transistor. I just looked at your schematic,and it appears correct.except that terminal 3 of the Igniter module does not go straight to the Darlington base,it goes to the IC that controls the Darlington.You need a rectangle indicating the control IC between the Pin 3 and the Darlington base.Pin 1(tach drive) probably goes to the control IC,too,certainly not to ground,Pin 4. (the emitter of the Darlington probably goes to the control IC,too,then thru a small value resistor[<1 ohm] for current monitoring by the IC,then to ground.) More information here than I've gotten yet. Thanks. |
#40
| |||
| |||
|
|
Something additional I thought of after I sent the last post(sorry!); The ECU does not ground the igniter module.It only sends a signal (to the control IC inside the igniter)for the Darlington to ground the coil. |
|
If the ECU were to be the ground for the igniter,that would mean that the entire coil current(several amps) would have to travel through the long wire from igniter to ECU,and the ECU itself would have to switch that high current to ground,which is the purpose of the igniter. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |