![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
The '03 Accord, on the other hand, puts a lot more under the sheet metal instead of toys in the cockpit. Judging by the relative sales of the Passat and the Accord, I think Honda's efforts are well focused. Sure, the Accord has it's trinkets too, but I'll take a 240hp V6 with traction control as a standard vs. 180hp V6 without any day. For my money, it's a lot tougher keeping a car on an icy road than taking a moment to flip on/off the lights or wipers. |
|
"Milleron" <millerdot90 (AT) SPAMlessosu (DOT) edu> wrote in message news:gfdugvo5uf1lvfo6dltd26nqe9f2j90td9 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 19:38:48 GMT, me (AT) homeoffice (DOT) com (Uncle Mike) wrote: In article <20030711144651.03088.00000150 (AT) mb-m12 (DOT) aol.com>, qdurham (AT) aol (DOT) com (QDurham) wrote: designed to start doing their thing automatically as soon as they become wet Wonderful! Ain't progress nifty. How'd we ever survive without this brealthrough? The BMW 7 series had this feature in 1990. maybe sooner. And one of the Accord EX's main competitors, the VW Passat, has rain-sensing wipers already. Ron |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 23:08:14 GMT, "Mike Dennis" <mapson (AT) woh (DOT) rr.com wrote: The '03 Accord, on the other hand, puts a lot more under the sheet metal instead of toys in the cockpit. Judging by the relative sales of the Passat and the Accord, I think Honda's efforts are well focused. Sure, the Accord has it's trinkets too, but I'll take a 240hp V6 with traction control as a standard vs. 180hp V6 without any day. For my money, it's a lot tougher keeping a car on an icy road than taking a moment to flip on/off the lights or wipers. Sorry if it sounded as though I was advising the purchase of a Passat because they have rain-sensing wipers. (After all, I looked at the Passat and the Camry, but there's an '03 Accord EX V6 in my garage.) I was just pointing out that the feature is real and available in the US on cars in the Accord's class. Ron "Milleron" <millerdot90 (AT) SPAMlessosu (DOT) edu> wrote in message news:gfdugvo5uf1lvfo6dltd26nqe9f2j90td9 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 19:38:48 GMT, me (AT) homeoffice (DOT) com (Uncle Mike) wrote: In article <20030711144651.03088.00000150 (AT) mb-m12 (DOT) aol.com>, qdurham (AT) aol (DOT) com (QDurham) wrote: designed to start doing their thing automatically as soon as they become wet Wonderful! Ain't progress nifty. How'd we ever survive without this brealthrough? The BMW 7 series had this feature in 1990. maybe sooner. And one of the Accord EX's main competitors, the VW Passat, has rain-sensing wipers already. Ron Ron |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
NetSock wrote: ... Before you go to the web site, read the message below. Make sure you have sound on. New Honda commercial in the UK. ... Firstly, this is really old news. Secondly, this commercial was not shot in one take. It was shot in two separate takes that were stitched together. A muffler rolling on the floor is the point wehere the two parts were stitched. -- Best regards, Andrey Tarasevich |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
... Before you go to the web site, read the message below. Make sure you have sound on. New Honda commercial in the UK. ... Firstly, this is really old news. Secondly, this commercial was not shot in one take. It was shot in two separate takes that were stitched together. A muffler rolling on the floor is the point wehere the two parts were stitched. Old news: Yes. Stitched Images: Not! |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
Tom Betz <tbetz (AT) pobox (DOT) com> wrote: Quoth dold (AT) NewXHondaX (DOT) usenet.us.com in news:ben4uu$sjf$2 (AT) blue (DOT) rahul.net: I read that this ad will not be shown in the United States because it is felt that it won't hold the attention of the average US viewer. A more practical reason not to show it in the US, of course, is that the car being promoted is not sold in the US. What, that collection of bits is supposed to represent a particular model of car? I thought it was an "Accord". Right or left hand drive, or the availability of that model in the US makes no difference in the ad. |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
Tom Betz <tbetz (AT) pobox (DOT) com> wrote: A more practical reason not to show it in the US, of course, is that the car being promoted is not sold in the US. What, that collection of bits is supposed to represent a particular model of car? |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
... A more practical reason not to show it in the US, of course, is that the car being promoted is not sold in the US. What, that collection of bits is supposed to represent a particular model of car? Did you watch the ad through its conclusion? There is no Accord station wagon available in the US. I didn't recall seeing a complete car at any point. Certainly for the US market, they could just show an appropriate model afterwards. |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
dold (AT) NewXHondaX (DOT) usenet.us.com wrote: ... A more practical reason not to show it in the US, of course, is that the car being promoted is not sold in the US. What, that collection of bits is supposed to represent a particular model of car? Did you watch the ad through its conclusion? There is no Accord station wagon available in the US. I didn't recall seeing a complete car at any point. Certainly for the US market, they could just show an appropriate model afterwards. They don't just "show a car afterwards". The complete car is the integral part of the sequence. Just watch the video from the beggining to the end. Replacing the car with an US model would require reshooting the entire sequence (as long as they want to stick to the "no computer tricks" philosophy, of course). What dif. does it make which market to car was from. I thought the video |
#20
| |||
| |||
|
Not quite, born in 1926, you do the math. ![]() mike hunt |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |