![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
|
I got news for you, japanese are already in Mexico. The US is there because of the Bush/Clinton NAFTA sellout/New world Order BS |
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
If someone notices that something is missing from a former step they pull the chain and stop the line. In the beginning the line was stopping all the time. Then the quality improved and the line hardly ever needs to be stopped. In GM they did not dare to do it so inspection is done after the car has been sold and the customer finds something wrong. First they deny the problem and then the customer gets angry and stoppes buying GM cars. That is a major difference and I have been waiting to see how long this could go on like this. It is very exciting to see that GM is finally dead and the prolonged funeral is taking place over the next months. RIP |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
there is no profit, but it is not as much as one would think. The people who are getting rich are the doctors, and most of all the ambulance chaser lawyers who force doctors to pay about $100,000 for malpractice insurance. That's how John Edwards made all his money. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:41:56 -0500, Rock Hardson wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/19/AR2008121903856.html?hpid%3Dtopnews&sub=AR The article states that the southern japanese factory worker was offered to join the union bringing wages on par to its northern American worker but they opted to stay bare foot and po' for japanese pennies. How STUPID can people be! If they had simply joined the union they would be getting the same exact pay and benefits as the northern worker living a higher standard of life and there would have been an even playing field for all manufactures from the start. For years it has been said that the Japanese choose the southern worker simply to take advantage of there ignorance. I guess the article proves they were right about that one. Now the northern worker will be forced to be dragged down to the level of pay of the southern worker. Its a simple question of is everyone on board to make a lot of money or will a segment of the community just drag others down to make a lesser amount of money??? I had a good job with a *BIG* corporation (at the time #3 in the Fortune 500). It became very apparent there was going to be a layoff. I was *NOT* a good union member. We were coming up to contract negotiations, and there was word of a strike. Screw that. I was reading the WSJ every day and aircraft orders were waning. A real union dog came up and asked me what I was going to do. Cross the line, of course! Nobody in the friggin' union signs my paycheck. So I asked him, if it comes down to you getting $0.25 an hour more (we were making $17 and hour in 1991, full medical, dental, pension, etc) and watching 5 people walk out the door, what would you say? "Gimme the quarter". I would have taken a cut in pay, even back to $12~14 an hour. In a bad economy, a good job at lower pay is better than *NO* job at all. They got the quarter. We got the axe. The one good thing out of it all was, even though the other guy had been with the company longer, he went out the door before me. Stupid union dogs. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 16:32:55 -0500, "Mike Hunter" a lame top poster wrote: "me" <noem... (AT) nothere (DOT) com> wrote in message you will be the first to complain when your city is attacked. Somebody needs a dose of reality. We know, that person is you * *LOL Enjoy hanging with your friends in the militia. Be sure to hide some guns in the walls of your house so the gov't doesn't get 'em all when they send "them" after you. Don't forget to keep your tinfoil hat on tight. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
| Mark A wrote: "80 Knight" <nospam> wrote in message news:zPadnayjd4M6hc3UnZ2dnUVZ_oPinZ2d (AT) giganews (DOT) com... I don't know what countries you are talking about, but here in Canada, I can choose whatever Doctor I want, I and my Doctor decide what treatment I get, and the waiting times are much less then most people think they are. As for you comment about age, that is pure bull shit. I can't speak about CA but in most European countries if a patient has a serious disease and are over a certain age, they might not spend as much money treating you as if you were younger (depending on what the treatment costs are). You cannot go to "any" doctor and get free care, you can only go to doctors who are paid by the national health care plan. That is like an HMO and why people in the US complain about it. A lot of Canadians come to the US and pay for healthcare out of their own pocket, to get the treatment they want. Far more Canadians get health care paid for by their government when they come to the U.S. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:23:27 -0500, "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@lycos/com wrote: Any American who believes the government will provide them with better hearthcare for less money, was never in the US military. If they were, they cerainly were never in a VA hospital LOL There's a big differnece between the government _providing_ health care and the government serving as the intermediary (i.e. "insurer") between the clients and the providers. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:23:27 -0500, "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@lycos/com wrote: Any American who believes the government will provide them with better hearthcare for less money, was never in the US military. If they were, they cerainly were never in a VA hospital LOL There's a big differnece between the government _providing_ health care and the government serving as the intermediary (i.e. "insurer") between the clients and the providers. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |