AutosTalk Forums  

10,000 for Pole Day?

Indy Car motor racing Discussions About Indy Car motor racing (rec.autos.sport.indy)


Discuss 10,000 for Pole Day? in the Indy Car motor racing forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41  
Old   
Lenny
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 10,000 for Pole Day? - 05-16-2007 , 05:38 AM






On May 15, 11:47 pm, Mark <mblackwell1... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:
Quote:
Send them to Monaco then.

Don't need to do that either. There are plenty of races that would be
better right here in the US. None of them are IRL races, and it
wouldn't be Daytona or Dega if it were a Nascar event. Still no
comment about the 500? Can you name 3 things that have improved in
open wheel racing since the formation of the IRL? Sure isn't ticket
sales. It isn't TV ratings. What could it be??

The inflated size of Tony's ego?




Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old   
6andretti
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Crossposting dot (was Re: 10,000 for Pole Day?) - 05-16-2007 , 07:05 AM






On Mon, 14 May 2007 16:10:43 -0500, "." <. (AT) dot (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
"Cessna 310" <jolene310 (AT) sbc (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:_l32i.36$PD4.13 (AT) newsfe04 (DOT) lga...

Please note that the dot crossposts to rec.auto.sport.cart on each of
'its' posts regardless of whether the original post included that ng or
not.

That's 'its' way of making sure 'its' posts are seen by a much larger
number of people than visit rec.autos.sport.indy


Wrong yet again (as if it were any longer necessary
to even state), not only is that not my motivation,
but there exist far more posts (for those that can
distinguish the difference, very much unlike the OP)
in rasi than there are in rasc. There are almost zero
posts and replies from denizens in the latter group
that don't also post/reply to the former.

Studies show 99% of people who use too many words are dolts. Make
that 99.1%


Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old   
.
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Crossposting dot (was Re: 10,000 for Pole Day?) - 05-16-2007 , 08:30 AM



"6andretti" <mdequardo (AT) tds (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007 16:10:43 -0500, "." <. (AT) dot (DOT) com> wrote:

"Cessna 310" <jolene310 (AT) sbc (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:_l32i.36$PD4.13 (AT) newsfe04 (DOT) lga...

Please note that the dot crossposts to rec.auto.sport.cart on each of
'its' posts regardless of whether the original post included that ng or
not.

That's 'its' way of making sure 'its' posts are seen by a much larger
number of people than visit rec.autos.sport.indy


Wrong yet again (as if it were any longer necessary
to even state), not only is that not my motivation,
but there exist far more posts (for those that can
distinguish the difference, very much unlike the OP)
in rasi than there are in rasc. There are almost zero
posts and replies from denizens in the latter group
that don't also post/reply to the former.

Studies show 99% of people who use too many words are dolts. Make
that 99.1%
In your case, a single word has
always proven to be far too many.




Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old   
6andretti
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Crossposting dot (was Re: 10,000 for Pole Day?) - 05-17-2007 , 03:36 PM



On Wed, 16 May 2007 08:30:03 -0500, "." <. (AT) dot (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
"6andretti" <mdequardo (AT) tds (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:iqsl43l2ei33f6lrg3nae3ssnutmj89ash (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
On Mon, 14 May 2007 16:10:43 -0500, "." <. (AT) dot (DOT) com> wrote:

"Cessna 310" <jolene310 (AT) sbc (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:_l32i.36$PD4.13 (AT) newsfe04 (DOT) lga...

Please note that the dot crossposts to rec.auto.sport.cart on each of
'its' posts regardless of whether the original post included that ng or
not.

That's 'its' way of making sure 'its' posts are seen by a much larger
number of people than visit rec.autos.sport.indy


Wrong yet again (as if it were any longer necessary
to even state), not only is that not my motivation,
but there exist far more posts (for those that can
distinguish the difference, very much unlike the OP)
in rasi than there are in rasc. There are almost zero
posts and replies from denizens in the latter group
that don't also post/reply to the former.

Studies show 99% of people who use too many words are dolts. Make
that 99.1%

In your case, a single word has
always proven to be far too many.

Fine. Here's a number for you then. 99.2%


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.