http://motorsport.com/news/article.asp?ID=253101

On Thu, 17 May 2007 08:32:34 -0500, "." <. (AT) dot (DOT) com> wrote:

On May 17, 4:31 pm, 6andretti <mdequa... (AT) tds (DOT) net> wrote:
Even though he is quoting the article's title, he conviently omits the
fact that it was was Danica that was fastest. That is the same Danica
he bashed so badly in the past. I guess he is now a Danica fan for
life.

"Lenny" <haysooce (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

More pathetically feeble attempts at deception; there
was nothing to omit as even a retarded 10 year old in
a hurry would have easily realized that there was neither
Danica's name, car number, nor was there any allusion
whatsoever to her in the title of the article. Res ipsa
loquitor:
http://motorsport.com/news/article.asp?ID=253101

These are my original remarks, quoted and referenced
less than one month ago, with an encore quote here.
Consider just how horribly embarrassing such a turn of
events would have been, if only he'd had the sufficient
honor and character necessary to have been so inclined.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...31d80e3cd682af

Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.indy
From: "." <.... (AT) dot (DOT) com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 02:21:57 -0500
Local: Mon, Apr 23 2007 3:21 am
Subject: Re: My prediction: Danica will never win a race

" How very prescient of me. Too bad you and the rest of your
dimwitted brethren here are such tedious johnny-come-latelies:

Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.indy
From: "." <.... (AT) dot (DOT) com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 02:08:11 -0500
Subject: Re: DANICA MANIA

"With the possible exception of a late crash, equipment failure or
other unexpected caution flag condition involving or affecting the
race leaders, Danica Patrick will neither win, nor have a single
podium finish, for as long as she participates in open wheel
racing against the likes of talent such as Wheldon, Kanaan,
Herta, Franchitti, Castroneves, Hornish, Bourdais, DaMatta,
Junquiera, Tracy, Vasser ... "
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...945b7e9bedb974 "

On Fri, 18 May 2007 08:35:19 -0500, "." <. (AT) dot (DOT) com> wrote:

you want to invest some of your valuable dictionary, thesaurus, et al
time looking up run-on sentences.