![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
Cahill racing will hold a press conference tomorrow at the speedway to make their official announcement of their 2007 plans. The two car team and drivers could officially be announced tomorrow. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
ncrdbl1 wrote: Cahill racing will hold a press conference tomorrow at the speedway to make their official announcement of their 2007 plans. The two car team and drivers could officially be announced tomorrow. Not to pick, but where exactly was the news of that Jan. 10th announcement? I can't find it anywhere... |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
ncrdbl1 wrote: I made my position very clear when it comes for my non support of citgo. I have stated for the public that I do not and will not spend money with the company even if they do become a sponsor. A person being a fan of a series does not place them as supporters of all sponsors in that series. I do not shop at target nor will I ever shop at target. I do not use the main library in our city due to the walkway having a quote from the communist manifesto written in it. I have been very consistent on my views and positions and they do not change based on circumstances or who may be involved in the situation. My support for any series or team does not change my personal view on issues. May I suggest you take the time to visit our local track sometime. You will find racers I have competed against for years and each will tell you that if they were wrong that I would tell them they were wrong friend or not. Ricky's post consists of much blather and all the same no substance. You boycott libraries based on the content of a walkway due to a quote from a document? Let me guess, you objected to anything to do with free education and the abolition of child labor? However, I digress; you steadfastly support a racing team, despite their clear association with a stridently anti-American socialist? In actual fact, commenting positively about another business supporting Citgo/Hugo Chavez is very much relevant. The fact that you distinguish between supporting the IRL despite them throwing in with Mr. Chavez just highlights your hypocrisy, as earlier stated. That is, you not only embraced them, you spontaneously triumphed and cooed about the upcoming (now delayed) announcement concerning Cahill's Citgo/Hugo Chavez sponsorship announcement. Can't have it both ways Ricky, you either do support or do not support Citgo and its business associates. Seems like you want to say it's okay for the IRL and Cahill to do business with the communists, but a library in the USA can't even mention the underlying document without your impotent wrath being brought down upon them. When you go about triumphing those that do business with Citgo you have lent your support for Hugo Chavez, et al. No amount of your equivocating can change that. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |