AutosTalk Forums  

Re: Ford Ends Champ Car Association

Indy Car motor racing Discussions About Indy Car motor racing (rec.autos.sport.indy)


Discuss Re: Ford Ends Champ Car Association in the Indy Car motor racing forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
.
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Ford Ends Champ Car Association - 01-26-2007 , 02:41 PM






"xorbit" <xorbit (AT) nospam (DOT) ca> wrote

Quote:

Von Fourche wrote:

In November and December I predicted that ChampCar would not even
make
it to the 2007 season. I still stand my prediction. Even if they do
race,
it's clear no one considers them a top tier racing series any more, not
even
themselves. Not racing and racing as a second tier 'support' series is
the
same thing so - I win.

There needs to be some very serious money put up to back up your
assertion. How much are you willing to put down to put your money where
your mouth is?


Exactly the same number as those willing to accept
my wager with repect to the number of entries at
the Indy 500:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...3d4fb70868f78d

But of course unlike the cowardly chumps, I had
the guts to post my offer to BOTH groups, assuring
that those anonymous, nym shifting, pusillanimous
nincompoops would have the greatest opportunity
to actually undeniably encounter my challenge
before tacitly running away with their tails between
their legs.




Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Anton Hulman George
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Ford Ends Champ Car Association - 01-26-2007 , 05:33 PM








On Jan 26, 12:41 pm, "." <.... (AT) dot (DOT) com> wrote:
Quote:
"xorbit" <xor... (AT) nospam (DOT) ca> wrote in messagenews:SBquh.250$Dw4.109 (AT) newsfe03 (DOT) lga...





Von Fourche wrote:

In November and December I predicted that ChampCar would not even
make> > > it to the 2007 season. I still stand my prediction. Even if they do
race,
it's clear no one considers them a top tier racing series any more, not
even
themselves. Not racing and racing as a second tier 'support' series is
the
same thing so - I win.

There needs to be some very serious money put up to back up your
assertion. How much are you willing to put down to put your money where
your mouth is?

Exactly the same number <SMACK!
As you never posted terms for the wager, no proper proffer was ever
made by you. You were called on it then, and now again. A wager
requires terms and odds (payoffs) to be valid. In your infinite
stupidity, and despite being called on it, you still haven't posted
either of the requisite items. Ergo, you never made an offer that
could or could not be accepted, dotty-dolt. You're still the same
sniveling whiner you always been, dishonest at your core and as
hypocritical as humanly possible.

However, do keep up the fine effort.



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Cal Vanize
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Ford Ends Champ Car Association - 01-26-2007 , 06:53 PM





Anton Hulman George wrote:

Quote:
On Jan 26, 12:41 pm, "." <.... (AT) dot (DOT) com> wrote:

"xorbit" <xor... (AT) nospam (DOT) ca> wrote in messagenews:SBquh.250$Dw4.109 (AT) newsfe03 (DOT) lga...






Von Fourche wrote:

In November and December I predicted that ChampCar would not even

make> > > it to the 2007 season. I still stand my prediction. Even if they do
race,

it's clear no one considers them a top tier racing series any more, not

even

themselves. Not racing and racing as a second tier 'support' series is

the

same thing so - I win.

There needs to be some very serious money put up to back up your
assertion. How much are you willing to put down to put your money where
your mouth is?


Exactly the same number <SMACK!


As you never posted terms for the wager, no proper proffer was ever
made by you. You were called on it then, and now again. A wager
requires terms and odds (payoffs) to be valid. In your infinite
stupidity, and despite being called on it, you still haven't posted
either of the requisite items. Ergo, you never made an offer that
could or could not be accepted, dotty-dolt. You're still the same
sniveling whiner you always been, dishonest at your core and as
hypocritical as humanly possible.

However, do keep up the fine effort.

Please don't respond to a troll message from that convicted sociopath.
Just killfile it.

I found out that the reason it hasn't been around too much lately was
that it was in solitary confinement.




Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
.
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Ford Ends Champ Car Association - 01-27-2007 , 09:50 AM



"Anton Hulman George" <merdetta (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

On Jan 26, 12:41 pm, "." <.... (AT) dot (DOT) com> wrote:
"xorbit" <xor... (AT) nospam (DOT) ca> wrote in
messagenews:SBquh.250$Dw4.109 (AT) newsfe03 (DOT) lga...





Von Fourche wrote:

In November and December I predicted that ChampCar would not
even
make> > > it to the 2007 season. I still stand my prediction. Even if
they do
race,
it's clear no one considers them a top tier racing series any more,
not
even
themselves. Not racing and racing as a second tier 'support' series
is
the
same thing so - I win.

There needs to be some very serious money put up to back up your
assertion. How much are you willing to put down to put your money
where
your mouth is?

Exactly the same number as those willing to accept
my wager with repect to the number of entries at
the Indy 500:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...3d4fb70868f78d

Quote:
But of course unlike the cowardly chumps, I had
the guts to post my offer to BOTH groups, assuring
that those anonymous, nym shifting, pusillanimous
nincompoops would have the greatest opportunity
to actually undeniably encounter my challenge
before tacitly running away with their tails between
their legs.

Quote:
As you never posted terms for the wager, no proper proffer was ever
made by you.
I didn't propose a specific bet, I solicited whether
anyone wanted to hazard one, my exact words being:
"I'm more than willing to wager that there will be more
than twenty cars..." The overwhelming silence of those
expressing an interest was deafening, the pathetically
feeble attempts at obfuscation, defining. Any one of
you anonymous, nym shifting, pusillanimous nincom-
poops could have responded with any particulars you
desired, but in light of the earlier remarks ("it looks like
AGR will be fielding at least a quarter of the Indy 500
cars this year" AND "Uh huh. Five of twenty"), you
were quite obviously far too fearful and lacking the
courage of your convictions to do so.

Quote:
You were called on it then, and now again.
And no one was buying your excuses then
and no one is buying your bullshit now.

Quote:
A wager requires terms and odds (payoffs) to be valid.
So why didn't any of you cowards indicate that you
were interested, willing to participate or suggest any
amounts or parameters? To ask the question is to
answer it.

Quote:
In your infinite
stupidity, and despite being called on it, you still haven't posted
either of the requisite items.
What a coincidence, neither did anyone else.

Quote:
Ergo, you never made an offer that
could or could not be accepted, dotty-dolt.
Hilarious coming from an oaf who would imply
a feasibilty in placing a bet with a coward that
won't so much as identify himself but constantly
hides behind ever changing nom de plumes.

Quote:
You're still the same
sniveling whiner you always been, dishonest at your core and as
hypocritical as humanly possible.
Clearly the sniveling, whining victims are well known to
have always been, and still continue to be, the chumps,
e.g., "the IRL/'Tony George bankrupted our series and
took our owners, teams, drivers, venues, sponsors,
vendors, TV contracts and exposure, viewers,
opportunities, future ..." I'm not complaining about
anything, what I am doing is laughing at such clowns
as yourself.

Quote:
However, do keep up the fine effort.
As always, all my efforts continue to be both fine and
successful. If there is any problem whatsoever, it
would solely be that continually kicking your asses
and exposing your ignorance and deceit has proven
to be neither a worthy challenge nor of the slightest
difficulty for me. A positive aspect however is that it
accordingly warrants, requires and receives very little
of my time and attention.




Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
forty
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Ford Ends Champ Car Association - 01-27-2007 , 12:14 PM



Anton Hulman George wrote:
Quote:
On Jan 26, 12:41 pm, "." <.... (AT) dot (DOT) com> wrote:
"xorbit" <xor... (AT) nospam (DOT) ca> wrote in messagenews:SBquh.250$Dw4.109 (AT) newsfe03 (DOT) lga...





Von Fourche wrote:
In November and December I predicted that ChampCar would not even
make> > > it to the 2007 season. I still stand my prediction. Even if they do
race,
it's clear no one considers them a top tier racing series any more, not
even
themselves. Not racing and racing as a second tier 'support' series is
the
same thing so - I win.
There needs to be some very serious money put up to back up your
assertion. How much are you willing to put down to put your money where
your mouth is?

Exactly the same number <SMACK!

As you never posted terms for the wager, no proper proffer was ever
made by you. You were called on it then, and now again. A wager
requires terms and odds (payoffs) to be valid. In your infinite
stupidity, and despite being called on it, you still haven't posted
either of the requisite items. Ergo, you never made an offer that
could or could not be accepted, dotty-dolt. You're still the same
sniveling whiner you always been, dishonest at your core and as
hypocritical as humanly possible.

However, do keep up the fine effort.

It's words have no weight whatsoever. The cowardly liar spits and spews
forth its frivolous tripe from behind its keyboard without any
connection to reality. I'm still waiting to hear from the 'multiple
parties' it contacted regarding my alleged 'thinly veiled threat.'
Nothing has come of it. Nothing at all. The IRL Officials just shook
their heads and laughed when I related the buffoon's idiocy to them.

--
forty

“To embrace an extreme, one must first let go of reason.”


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
Cal Vanize
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Ford Ends Champ Car Association - 01-27-2007 , 02:48 PM



Don't fuck with the Jesus wrote:

Quote:
On Jan 26, 12:41 pm, "." <.... (AT) dot (DOT) com> wrote:


I didn't propose a specific bet,


Bingo! No offer was ever made by you because you're merely a cravenly
gutless windbag. That is, you were specifically informed of what a
proper bet requires, and you made no attempt to change your tripe in
any way.


A wager requires terms and odds (payoffs) to be valid.


So why didn't any of you cowards indicate that you
were interested, willing to participate or suggest any

|>amounts or parameters? To ask the question is to

answer it.


I did expressly point out your proffers' deficiency; need a reference
to that specificity? You ranted and still you never posted terms and
you never posted payoffs.

Take the wager and you'll know exactly who I am as you'll be paying
me, dotty-dolt. And, we'll be placing my name and yours in an escrow
account prior to that. Of course, we'll know exactly who you are
too, eh? Let's see some green from you dolt-boy,m otherwise STFU and
accept your well deserved mantle of pusillanimous maroon. Is suspect
you haven't the minerals or the money, and we'll definitely discover
you're not John Dotson of Iowa as you have posted.

snip for Dotty-Dolt's sniveling lies


Couple of point need to be made.

First, even if the dot posted this message, nobody paid any more
attention to it than to anything else it says. So many of us have
messages from it killfiled that the only way its messages are discovered
is when someone not killfiled replies.

Second, the dot doesn't have the credibility to post a serious bet.

Third, it has no access to money from the high-security mental ward
where it lives.

Fourth, and most important....

Please don't feed that sociopathic troll. When you reply, its messages
get past my killfile filter.




Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old   
.
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Ford Ends Champ Car Association - 01-28-2007 , 10:07 AM



"Mario" <mariobindini_remove (AT) canada (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
"Jason Hoehn" <jason.hoehnnospamplease (AT) shaw (DOT) ca> wrote in message
news:xoMuh.822737$R63.650048 (AT) pd7urf1no (DOT) ..

"Cal Vanize" <dont.even.spam.me (AT) myspam (DOT) org> wrote in message
news:hq2uh.2427$do5.52 (AT) newsfe06 (DOT) lga...
Jason Hoehn wrote:
"forty" <cforteNO (AT) SPAMgmail (DOT) com> wrote in message

There are also some other cash flush corporations that could use some
exposure and might be good possibilities.

It'll be Mazda. good fit I think.


I think that Ford's reason for backing out was just a timely and
convenient
excuse for the fact that they're taking a big financial hit these days and
need
to tighten their belts.

Ford refers to the dumping of the chumps
as "jettisoning the deadwood".




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.