![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
| Von Fourche wrote: In November and December I predicted that ChampCar would not even make it to the 2007 season. I still stand my prediction. Even if they do race, it's clear no one considers them a top tier racing series any more, not even themselves. Not racing and racing as a second tier 'support' series is the same thing so - I win. There needs to be some very serious money put up to back up your assertion. How much are you willing to put down to put your money where your mouth is? |
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
"xorbit" <xor... (AT) nospam (DOT) ca> wrote in messagenews:SBquh.250$Dw4.109 (AT) newsfe03 (DOT) lga... Von Fourche wrote: In November and December I predicted that ChampCar would not even make> > > it to the 2007 season. I still stand my prediction. Even if they do race, it's clear no one considers them a top tier racing series any more, not even themselves. Not racing and racing as a second tier 'support' series is the same thing so - I win. There needs to be some very serious money put up to back up your assertion. How much are you willing to put down to put your money where your mouth is? Exactly the same number <SMACK! |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Jan 26, 12:41 pm, "." <.... (AT) dot (DOT) com> wrote: "xorbit" <xor... (AT) nospam (DOT) ca> wrote in messagenews:SBquh.250$Dw4.109 (AT) newsfe03 (DOT) lga... Von Fourche wrote: In November and December I predicted that ChampCar would not even make> > > it to the 2007 season. I still stand my prediction. Even if they do race, it's clear no one considers them a top tier racing series any more, not even themselves. Not racing and racing as a second tier 'support' series is the same thing so - I win. There needs to be some very serious money put up to back up your assertion. How much are you willing to put down to put your money where your mouth is? Exactly the same number <SMACK! As you never posted terms for the wager, no proper proffer was ever made by you. You were called on it then, and now again. A wager requires terms and odds (payoffs) to be valid. In your infinite stupidity, and despite being called on it, you still haven't posted either of the requisite items. Ergo, you never made an offer that could or could not be accepted, dotty-dolt. You're still the same sniveling whiner you always been, dishonest at your core and as hypocritical as humanly possible. However, do keep up the fine effort. |
#4
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
|
| On Jan 26, 12:41 pm, "." <.... (AT) dot (DOT) com> wrote: "xorbit" <xor... (AT) nospam (DOT) ca> wrote in messagenews:SBquh.250$Dw4.109 (AT) newsfe03 (DOT) lga... Von Fourche wrote: In November and December I predicted that ChampCar would not even make> > > it to the 2007 season. I still stand my prediction. Even if they do race, it's clear no one considers them a top tier racing series any more, not even themselves. Not racing and racing as a second tier 'support' series is the same thing so - I win. There needs to be some very serious money put up to back up your assertion. How much are you willing to put down to put your money where your mouth is? Exactly the same number as those willing to accept my wager with repect to the number of entries at the Indy 500: |
|
But of course unlike the cowardly chumps, I had the guts to post my offer to BOTH groups, assuring that those anonymous, nym shifting, pusillanimous nincompoops would have the greatest opportunity to actually undeniably encounter my challenge before tacitly running away with their tails between their legs. |
|
As you never posted terms for the wager, no proper proffer was ever made by you. |
|
You were called on it then, and now again. |
|
A wager requires terms and odds (payoffs) to be valid. |
|
In your infinite stupidity, and despite being called on it, you still haven't posted either of the requisite items. |
|
Ergo, you never made an offer that could or could not be accepted, dotty-dolt. |
|
You're still the same sniveling whiner you always been, dishonest at your core and as hypocritical as humanly possible. |
|
However, do keep up the fine effort. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Jan 26, 12:41 pm, "." <.... (AT) dot (DOT) com> wrote: "xorbit" <xor... (AT) nospam (DOT) ca> wrote in messagenews:SBquh.250$Dw4.109 (AT) newsfe03 (DOT) lga... Von Fourche wrote: In November and December I predicted that ChampCar would not even make> > > it to the 2007 season. I still stand my prediction. Even if they do race, it's clear no one considers them a top tier racing series any more, not even themselves. Not racing and racing as a second tier 'support' series is the same thing so - I win. There needs to be some very serious money put up to back up your assertion. How much are you willing to put down to put your money where your mouth is? Exactly the same number <SMACK! As you never posted terms for the wager, no proper proffer was ever made by you. You were called on it then, and now again. A wager requires terms and odds (payoffs) to be valid. In your infinite stupidity, and despite being called on it, you still haven't posted either of the requisite items. Ergo, you never made an offer that could or could not be accepted, dotty-dolt. You're still the same sniveling whiner you always been, dishonest at your core and as hypocritical as humanly possible. However, do keep up the fine effort. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Jan 26, 12:41 pm, "." <.... (AT) dot (DOT) com> wrote: I didn't propose a specific bet, Bingo! No offer was ever made by you because you're merely a cravenly gutless windbag. That is, you were specifically informed of what a proper bet requires, and you made no attempt to change your tripe in any way. A wager requires terms and odds (payoffs) to be valid. So why didn't any of you cowards indicate that you were interested, willing to participate or suggest any |>amounts or parameters? To ask the question is to answer it. I did expressly point out your proffers' deficiency; need a reference to that specificity? You ranted and still you never posted terms and you never posted payoffs. Take the wager and you'll know exactly who I am as you'll be paying me, dotty-dolt. And, we'll be placing my name and yours in an escrow account prior to that. Of course, we'll know exactly who you are too, eh? Let's see some green from you dolt-boy,m otherwise STFU and accept your well deserved mantle of pusillanimous maroon. Is suspect you haven't the minerals or the money, and we'll definitely discover you're not John Dotson of Iowa as you have posted. snip for Dotty-Dolt's sniveling lies |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Jason Hoehn" <jason.hoehnnospamplease (AT) shaw (DOT) ca> wrote in message news:xoMuh.822737$R63.650048 (AT) pd7urf1no (DOT) .. "Cal Vanize" <dont.even.spam.me (AT) myspam (DOT) org> wrote in message news:hq2uh.2427$do5.52 (AT) newsfe06 (DOT) lga... Jason Hoehn wrote: "forty" <cforteNO (AT) SPAMgmail (DOT) com> wrote in message There are also some other cash flush corporations that could use some exposure and might be good possibilities. It'll be Mazda. good fit I think. I think that Ford's reason for backing out was just a timely and convenient excuse for the fact that they're taking a big financial hit these days and need to tighten their belts. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |