![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
|
http://www.autoweek.com/article/20091030/IRL/910309985 http://www.ottawacitizen.com/sports/forgets+about+Greg+Moore/2161085/story.html http://www.indystar.com/article/20091030/SPORTS0107/910300383/1052/SPORTS01/Greg +Moore+would+have+dominated++many+say http://www.motorsport.com/news/article.asp?ID=350683&FS= http://www.nationalpost.com/sports/story.html?id=2162703 |
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
http://www.autoweek.com/article/20091030/IRL/910309985 http://www.ottawacitizen.com/sports/forgets+about+Greg+Moore/2161085/st ory.html http://www.indystar.com/article/20091030/SPORTS0107/910300383/1052/SPOR TS01/Greg +Moore+would+have+dominated++many+say http://www.motorsport.com/news/article.asp?ID=350683&FS= http://www.nationalpost.com/sports/story.html?id=2162703 |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
http://www.autoweek.com/article/20091030/IRL/910309985 http://www.ottawacitizen.com/sports/forgets+about+Greg+Moore/2161085/st ory.html http://www.indystar.com/article/20091030/SPORTS0107/910300383/1052/SPOR TS01/Greg +Moore+would+have+dominated++many+say http://www.motorsport.com/news/article.asp?ID=350683&FS= http://www.nationalpost.com/sports/story.html?id=2162703 |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
http://www.autoweek.com/article/20091030/IRL/910309985 http://www.ottawacitizen.com/sports/forgets+about+Greg+Moore/2161085/story.html http://www.indystar.com/article/20091030/SPORTS0107/910300383/1052/SPORTS01/Greg +Moore+would+have+dominated++many+say http://www.motorsport.com/news/article.asp?ID=350683&FS= http://www.nationalpost.com/sports/story.html?id=2162703 |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Paul Rankin" <pranking923 (AT) excite (DOT) com> wrote in message news:MPG.255565a0cdb6b6b3989dc6 (AT) news (DOT) x-privat.org... http://www.autoweek.com/article/20091030/IRL/910309985 http://www.ottawacitizen.com/sports/forgets+about+Greg+Moore/2161085/story.html http://www.indystar.com/article/20091030/SPORTS0107/910300383/1052/SPORTS01/Greg +Moore+would+have+dominated++many+say http://www.motorsport.com/news/article.asp?ID=350683&FS= http://www.nationalpost.com/sports/story.html?id=2162703 That had to be one of the most nasty crashes I've seen. Quite sickening. AC |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Paul Rankin wrote... http://www.autoweek.com/article/20091030/IRL/910309985 http://www.ottawacitizen.com/sports/forgets+about+Greg+Moore/2161085/story.html http://www.indystar.com/article/20091030/SPORTS0107/910300383/1052/SPORTS01/Greg +Moore+would+have+dominated++many+say http://www.motorsport.com/news/article.asp?ID=350683&FS= http://www.nationalpost.com/sports/story.html?id=2162703 On a similar note http://www.f1technical.net/articles/12773 |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
David Melville wrote... On a similar note http://www.f1technical.net/articles/12773 sigh..... What a horrible list. They're not dying in F1 now - thank fuck |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 09:27:22 +1100, Noj <me (AT) nomail (DOT) afraid.org> wrote: David Melville wrote... On a similar note http://www.f1technical.net/articles/12773 sigh..... What a horrible list. They're not dying in F1 now - thank fuck It'll happen again. You can't get rid of g-forces. All it takes is a rapid enough change of direction. But, yes, thank fuck the cars hold together now. I think the wheel tethers have made a BIG difference when it comes to bits flying |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
David Melville wrote: On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 09:27:22 +1100, Noj <me (AT) nomail (DOT) afraid.org> wrote: David Melville wrote... On a similar note http://www.f1technical.net/articles/12773 sigh..... What a horrible list. They're not dying in F1 now - thank fuck It'll happen again. You can't get rid of g-forces. All it takes is a rapid enough change of direction. But, yes, thank fuck the cars hold together now. I think the wheel tethers have made a BIG difference when it comes to bits flying Did you see Moore's crash? *Nothing* could protect a driver hitting a concrete wall at that attitude at that speed. 154g impact with only the roll bar and the driver's head between the car and the wall. |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 09:40:37 +1100, mower man <nospam (AT) f2s (DOT) com> wrote: David Melville wrote: On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 09:27:22 +1100, Noj <me (AT) nomail (DOT) afraid.org> wrote: David Melville wrote... On a similar note http://www.f1technical.net/articles/12773 sigh..... What a horrible list. They're not dying in F1 now - thank fuck It'll happen again. You can't get rid of g-forces. All it takes is a rapid enough change of direction. But, yes, thank fuck the cars hold together now. I think the wheel tethers have made a BIG difference when it comes to bits flying Did you see Moore's crash? *Nothing* could protect a driver hitting a concrete wall at that attitude at that speed. 154g impact with only the roll bar and the driver's head between the car and the wall. Is that @David (me)? Yes, I saw it live. One of those ones that nearly turned me off the sport altogether. Quite literally nauseating to watch. I've never seen a car collapse into such a small space. It was horrible. So, if your reply was @me, then yeah. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |