AutosTalk Forums  

Chrysler 8.25

Jeep and Willys Vehicles Discussions on Jeep and Willys vehicles. (rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys)


Discuss Chrysler 8.25 in the Jeep and Willys Vehicles forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
nrs
 
Posts: n/a

Default Chrysler 8.25 - 03-05-2007 , 10:18 AM







Recently, I started noticing a lot of Cherokees with Chrysler 8.25
rear axles. The weakness of the Dana 35c has been talked about a lot
but I haven't heard any complaints about the 8.25. Would these be a
good upgrade from a Dana 35c? Any known issues?

Thanks


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
billy ray
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Chrysler 8.25 - 03-05-2007 , 10:46 AM






That axle was used on 3/4 ton trucks for 3-4 decades so I'll assume that it
proved to be strong enough.


"nrs" <neale_rs (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Recently, I started noticing a lot of Cherokees with Chrysler 8.25
rear axles. The weakness of the Dana 35c has been talked about a lot
but I haven't heard any complaints about the 8.25. Would these be a
good upgrade from a Dana 35c? Any known issues?

Thanks




Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Earle Horton
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Chrysler 8.25 - 03-05-2007 , 11:39 AM



That was a different axle you are thinking of, the 8.375". If I am not
mistaken, 9.25" was more usual for 3/4 ton trucks, but it has been a while.
I replaced quite a few grease seals on the old 8.375" axles, and they had a
proper inboard oil seal, an external grease seal and a grease packed tapered
roller bearing between the two. The telephone companies used about a
zillion of them in Dodge A-100 vans.

Still, the 8.25" has a bigger ring gear than the D35c. The inner C-clip is
a bone of contention. I don't know if the 8.25" has one, but I know first
hand that the current 9.25" does.

Earle

"billy ray" <billy_ray (AT) SPAMfuse (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
That axle was used on 3/4 ton trucks for 3-4 decades so I'll assume that
it
proved to be strong enough.


"nrs" <neale_rs (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1173107907.508578.307290 (AT) v33g2000cwv (DOT) googlegroups.com...

Recently, I started noticing a lot of Cherokees with Chrysler 8.25
rear axles. The weakness of the Dana 35c has been talked about a lot
but I haven't heard any complaints about the 8.25. Would these be a
good upgrade from a Dana 35c? Any known issues?

Thanks






Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
nrs
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Chrysler 8.25 - 03-05-2007 , 05:22 PM



On Mar 5, 10:39 am, "Earle Horton" <a... (AT) gracioso (DOT) usa> wrote:
Quote:
That was a different axle you are thinking of, the 8.375". If I am not
mistaken, 9.25" was more usual for 3/4 ton trucks, but it has been a while.
I replaced quite a few grease seals on the old 8.375" axles, and they had a
proper inboard oil seal, an external grease seal and a grease packed tapered
roller bearing between the two. The telephone companies used about a
zillion of them in Dodge A-100 vans.

Still, the 8.25" has a bigger ring gear than the D35c. The inner C-clip is
a bone of contention. I don't know if the 8.25" has one, but I know first
hand that the current 9.25" does.

Earle

"billy ray" <billy_... (AT) SPAMfuse (DOT) net> wrote in message

news:fa6d$45ec3b62$422afc51$11021 (AT) FUSE (DOT) NET...



That axle was used on 3/4 ton trucks for 3-4 decades so I'll assume that
it
proved to be strong enough.

"nrs" <neale... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1173107907.508578.307290 (AT) v33g2000cwv (DOT) googlegroups.com...

Recently, I started noticing a lot of Cherokees with Chrysler 8.25
rear axles. The weakness of the Dana 35c has been talked about a lot
but I haven't heard any complaints about the 8.25. Would these be a
good upgrade from a Dana 35c? Any known issues?

Thanks- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Sounds like it is better than a D35. Should be a lot more around than
the Cherokee D44's. Thanks for the input.



Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
c
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Chrysler 8.25 - 03-05-2007 , 06:38 PM



nrs wrote:
Quote:
On Mar 5, 10:39 am, "Earle Horton" <a... (AT) gracioso (DOT) usa> wrote:
That was a different axle you are thinking of, the 8.375". If I am not
mistaken, 9.25" was more usual for 3/4 ton trucks, but it has been a while.
I replaced quite a few grease seals on the old 8.375" axles, and they had a
proper inboard oil seal, an external grease seal and a grease packed tapered
roller bearing between the two. The telephone companies used about a
zillion of them in Dodge A-100 vans.

Still, the 8.25" has a bigger ring gear than the D35c. The inner C-clip is
a bone of contention. I don't know if the 8.25" has one, but I know first
hand that the current 9.25" does.

Earle

"billy ray" <billy_... (AT) SPAMfuse (DOT) net> wrote in message

news:fa6d$45ec3b62$422afc51$11021 (AT) FUSE (DOT) NET...



That axle was used on 3/4 ton trucks for 3-4 decades so I'll assume that
it
proved to be strong enough.
"nrs" <neale... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1173107907.508578.307290 (AT) v33g2000cwv (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Recently, I started noticing a lot of Cherokees with Chrysler 8.25
rear axles. The weakness of the Dana 35c has been talked about a lot
but I haven't heard any complaints about the 8.25. Would these be a
good upgrade from a Dana 35c? Any known issues?
Thanks- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Sounds like it is better than a D35. Should be a lot more around than
the Cherokee D44's. Thanks for the input.

Just remember that the aftermarket parts selection may not be as good as
the D44 if you decide to change gears, add lockers, etc.

Chris


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
nrs
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Chrysler 8.25 - 03-06-2007 , 09:43 AM



On Mar 5, 5:38 pm, c <c... (AT) me (DOT) org> wrote:
Quote:
nrs wrote:
On Mar 5, 10:39 am, "Earle Horton" <a... (AT) gracioso (DOT) usa> wrote:
That was a different axle you are thinking of, the 8.375". If I am not
mistaken, 9.25" was more usual for 3/4 ton trucks, but it has been a while.
I replaced quite a few grease seals on the old 8.375" axles, and they had a
proper inboard oil seal, an external grease seal and a grease packed tapered
roller bearing between the two. The telephone companies used about a
zillion of them in Dodge A-100 vans.

Still, the 8.25" has a bigger ring gear than the D35c. The inner C-clip is
a bone of contention. I don't know if the 8.25" has one, but I know first
hand that the current 9.25" does.

Earle

"billy ray" <billy_... (AT) SPAMfuse (DOT) net> wrote in message

news:fa6d$45ec3b62$422afc51$11021 (AT) FUSE (DOT) NET...

That axle was used on 3/4 ton trucks for 3-4 decades so I'll assume that
it
proved to be strong enough.
"nrs" <neale... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1173107907.508578.307290 (AT) v33g2000cwv (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Recently, I started noticing a lot of Cherokees with Chrysler 8.25
rear axles. The weakness of the Dana 35c has been talked about a lot
but I haven't heard any complaints about the 8.25. Would these be a
good upgrade from a Dana 35c? Any known issues?
Thanks- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Sounds like it is better than a D35. Should be a lot more around than
the Cherokee D44's. Thanks for the input.

Just remember that the aftermarket parts selection may not be as good as
the D44 if you decide to change gears, add lockers, etc.

Chris- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
I did a quick internet check and it looks like most lockers are now
available but the lowest available gearing is 4.56.



Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.