AutosTalk Forums  

Rolling radius - something to think about or not?

Mini Discussion of English Mini automobiles (alt.autos.mini)


Discuss Rolling radius - something to think about or not? in the Mini forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
greasemonkey78
 
Posts: n/a

Default Rolling radius - something to think about or not? - 08-03-2005 , 11:17 AM






Recently I upgraded both the wheels and tyres on my car, and had to go to a
70 profile height instead of 80, because I was worried about the rolling
radius being different to original. Would this actually have been a
problem, because next time I might fit the higher profile in order to get
a better ride?


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Paul Prescott
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Rolling radius - something to think about or not? - 08-04-2005 , 05:37 PM






Depends if you changed the width. Usual reason for going lower profile is to
maintain the gear ratios and speedo calibration (and wheel arch clearance)
when using wider than standard tyres. eg. 145/80/10 is roughly the same
rolling radius as 165/70/10 (and possibly 165/55/12?). The poor ride is the
price you pay for fashionably wide boots. (A lot worse with 175/50/13s, I
would guess.)

"greasemonkey78" <bonefish45 (AT) tiscali (DOT) co.uk> wrote

Quote:
Recently I upgraded both the wheels and tyres on my car, and had to go to
a
70 profile height instead of 80, because I was worried about the rolling
radius being different to original. Would this actually have been a
problem, because next time I might fit the higher profile in order to get
a better ride?




Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Tim
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Rolling radius - something to think about or not? - 08-09-2005 , 02:22 AM



I have two cars (mine and the wifes) on 13's and both are comfortable....my
66 S on 10's is more nimble and easier on tight turning... but feels ever
pot hole in the roads ....

Mind you both cars on 13's have the Moulton Smooth ride kits fitted.....

"Paul Prescott" <Paul.Prescott2 (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Depends if you changed the width. Usual reason for going lower profile is
to
maintain the gear ratios and speedo calibration (and wheel arch clearance)
when using wider than standard tyres. eg. 145/80/10 is roughly the same
rolling radius as 165/70/10 (and possibly 165/55/12?). The poor ride is
the
price you pay for fashionably wide boots. (A lot worse with 175/50/13s, I
would guess.)

"greasemonkey78" <bonefish45 (AT) tiscali (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:afc2f7debcb1db7e7ce350f41f38f28d (AT) localhost (DOT) talkaboutautos.com...
Recently I upgraded both the wheels and tyres on my car, and had to go to
a
70 profile height instead of 80, because I was worried about the rolling
radius being different to original. Would this actually have been a
problem, because next time I might fit the higher profile in order to get
a better ride?






Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Kelley Mascher
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Rolling radius - something to think about or not? - 08-09-2005 , 01:50 PM




Tim, does the '66 'S' still have the 40 year-old rubber springs?

Cheers, Kelley

On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 18:22:26 +1200, "Tim"
<tim_lis(NOSPAM)@clear.net.nz> wrote:

Quote:
I have two cars (mine and the wifes) on 13's and both are comfortable....my
66 S on 10's is more nimble and easier on tight turning... but feels ever
pot hole in the roads ....

Mind you both cars on 13's have the Moulton Smooth ride kits fitted.....

"Paul Prescott" <Paul.Prescott2 (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:TUvIe.12558$9K3.8080 (AT) newsfe7-win (DOT) ntli.net...
Depends if you changed the width. Usual reason for going lower profile is
to
maintain the gear ratios and speedo calibration (and wheel arch clearance)
when using wider than standard tyres. eg. 145/80/10 is roughly the same
rolling radius as 165/70/10 (and possibly 165/55/12?). The poor ride is
the
price you pay for fashionably wide boots. (A lot worse with 175/50/13s, I
would guess.)

"greasemonkey78" <bonefish45 (AT) tiscali (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:afc2f7debcb1db7e7ce350f41f38f28d (AT) localhost (DOT) talkaboutautos.com...
Recently I upgraded both the wheels and tyres on my car, and had to go to
a
70 profile height instead of 80, because I was worried about the rolling
radius being different to original. Would this actually have been a
problem, because next time I might fit the higher profile in order to get
a better ride?






Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
Steve68s
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Rolling radius - something to think about or not? - 08-10-2005 , 04:37 AM




"Kelley Mascher" <mascherk (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
Tim, does the '66 'S' still have the 40 year-old rubber springs?

Cheers, Kelley

On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 18:22:26 +1200, "Tim"
tim_lis(NOSPAM)@clear.net.nz> wrote:

I have two cars (mine and the wifes) on 13's and both are
comfortable....my
66 S on 10's is more nimble and easier on tight turning... but feels ever
pot hole in the roads ....

Mind you both cars on 13's have the Moulton Smooth ride kits fitted.....

"Paul Prescott" <Paul.Prescott2 (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:TUvIe.12558$9K3.8080 (AT) newsfe7-win (DOT) ntli.net...
Depends if you changed the width. Usual reason for going lower profile
is
to
maintain the gear ratios and speedo calibration (and wheel arch
clearance)
when using wider than standard tyres. eg. 145/80/10 is roughly the same
rolling radius as 165/70/10 (and possibly 165/55/12?). The poor ride is
the
price you pay for fashionably wide boots. (A lot worse with 175/50/13s,
I
would guess.)

"greasemonkey78" <bonefish45 (AT) tiscali (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:afc2f7debcb1db7e7ce350f41f38f28d (AT) localhost (DOT) talkaboutautos.com...
Recently I upgraded both the wheels and tyres on my car, and had to go
to
a
70 profile height instead of 80, because I was worried about the
rolling
radius being different to original. Would this actually have been a
problem, because next time I might fit the higher profile in order to
get
a better ride?





I think his car has new rubber cones fitted, these are part of the moulton
smoothride kit,

Steve.




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.