![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <Mz13i.21007$Ro3.9016 (AT) text (DOT) news.blueyonder.co.uk>, PC Paul says... And there would be a lot of people doing 85-90mph, just as there are now. Where? Damned if I see them. I see "a few", certainly nowhere near enough to be classed as " a lot". |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
And there would be a lot of people doing 85-90mph, just as there are now. Where? Damned if I see them. I see "a few", certainly nowhere near enough to be classed as " a lot". |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
- Trying to slot into L3 to get past the duelling 90k limiter brigade |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Ed Chilada" <nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote in message news:av5o43hhvjo4bsnhcigpjah6a9808kve4l (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... It was GPS based (and let's assume it just works), and like was said, it enforced you to do no more than the speed limit. 20 in a 20, 30 in a 30. You get a different style number plate so that people behind you will have a little more patience knowing that you're going as fast as you can. Let's say you are travelling along a SC with a 60 limit following a 20m long HGV doing 40mph (call it 18m/s for the maths.) Now being a safe driver you leave 10m behind and in front for your overtake for safe breaking distances, that's a total of 40m. If you accelerate to 60mph 27m/s before pulling out that's a speed differential of 9m/s so to travel the relative 40m will take 4.5s and you are in the oncoming lane for 121.5m, if you accelerate to 80mph 36m/s that's an 18m/s differential or 2.25s exposed to danger half the time for only a third more speed you are also only in the oncoming lane for 80m 65% of the distance of passing at 60. Being able to exceed the speed limits can be a safety asset so long as it's not abused and that's something the almost extinct breed known as traffic police always knew but it's not a politically correct thing to admit now. |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
Let's say you are travelling along a SC with a 60 limit following a 20m long HGV doing 40mph (call it 18m/s for the maths.) Now being a safe driver you leave 10m behind and in front for your overtake for safe breaking distances, that's a total of 40m. If you accelerate to 60mph 27m/s before pulling out that's a speed differential of 9m/s so to travel the relative 40m will take 4.5s and you are in the oncoming lane for 121.5m, if you accelerate to 80mph 36m/s that's an 18m/s differential or 2.25s exposed to danger half the time for only a third more speed you are also only in the oncoming lane for 80m 65% of the distance of passing at 60. Being able to exceed the speed limits can be a safety asset so long as it's not abused and that's something the almost extinct breed known as traffic police always knew but it's not a politically correct thing to admit now. Aren't you basing this on instant acceleration from 40mph to 60mph? Since acceleration varies a lot, from a micra to an EVO, he couldn't |
|
Anyhow, yeah - sometimes life's a bummer and you get stuck behind someone for 5 minutes until there's a chance to overtake without breaking the speed limit. Calm down I'd say. And sometimes you get stuck behind a moron who drives at 40 or less on |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
And sometimes you get stuck behind a moron who drives at 40 or less on well sighted but too-busy-to-overtake A-roads for 80 miles, twice a week, meaning that 3.6 days (or 1%) of your life are pointlessly wasted. Anything less than a 1% chance of dying whilst travelling at 60mph instead mean that the ensemble life-span is actually *increased* by going more quickly. Moreover, since said moron typically builds up a queue of dozens of cars, this effect is significantly increased. /tongue in cheek |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
Conor wrote: In article <Mz13i.21007$Ro3.9016 (AT) text (DOT) news.blueyonder.co.uk>, PC Paul says... And there would be a lot of people doing 85-90mph, just as there are now. Where? Damned if I see them. I see "a few", certainly nowhere near enough to be classed as " a lot". That's 'cos the roads you drive on are clogged with trucks. Cars actually. |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
Adrian wrote: - Trying to slot into L3 to get past the duelling 90k limiter brigade Why do these cunts have to keep on trying to overtake each other three abreast? You've all got the same speed limits you pricks! You're the only prick here if you think that's the case. |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <HW13i.21027$Ro3.6989 (AT) text (DOT) news.blueyonder.co.uk>, PC Paul says... Conor wrote: In article <Mz13i.21007$Ro3.9016 (AT) text (DOT) news.blueyonder.co.uk>, PC Paul says... And there would be a lot of people doing 85-90mph, just as there are now. Where? Damned if I see them. I see "a few", certainly nowhere near enough to be classed as " a lot". That's 'cos the roads you drive on are clogged with trucks. Cars actually. |
#20
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <928f9$464d6504$3e18e6cb$23963 (AT) news (DOT) vispa.com>, Richard Polhill says... Adrian wrote: - Trying to slot into L3 to get past the duelling 90k limiter brigade Why do these cunts have to keep on trying to overtake each other three abreast? You've all got the same speed limits you pricks! You're the only prick here if you think that's the case. Really? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |