Nick Finnigan (nix (AT) genie (DOT) co.uk) gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying :

True, but...

It does indeed... He said the Landies were coming off MoD plates.

There's just that small matter of a "but..." - the law requires all
vehicles being used on UK roads to be registered with DVLA and carry plates
bearing the registration numbers, as well as having insurance/MOT/VED in
place, except in certain circumstances - such as being correctly registered
and legal in a foreign country for a short period, or being taken to a VRO
for an appointment to be UK registered...

So trying to say "Well, it ain't registered" to get off the (small fine, no
points) tax tug doesn't really make a lot of sense, because you'd be in far
deeper shit...

On 19 Jan 2007 14:32:14 -0800, unit244 (AT) defencecontracts (DOT) org.uk wrote:

You do know that it is *very* bad to use an email address that doesn't
belong to you in the "From:" line of a post, don't you?

Steve Firth wrote:

He's a lying piece of shit at best; at worst, a self-deluded military
fantasist who sits at home wanking over pictures of apache helicopters.


--
vulgarandmischevious

If you believe it or not, it happened. There was no need to show
plates or a tax disc, as it was not registered, MoD vehicle are not
registered with the DVLA, they issue thier own plates. I would have
thought a know it all like you would have known that. It had an MoT
and odd one, becuase it had the VIN number in place of the reg number
and same with the insurance cover note, and then I had a copy of the
MoD release papers.

I suppose a genius like you, would have gone to the unecessary trouble
of trailering it from the MoD disposals site to the local VRO, then
trailering it from thier to Halfords to get some plates made up.

(unit244 (AT) defencecontracts (DOT) org.uk) gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying :

Oh, I believe it.

Indeed they are. For MOD business. If being used OTHER than by the MOD,
they need to be DVLA registered...

I s'pose anybody who wanted to be legal would.

On 27 Jan 2007 13:33:05 -0800, unit244 (AT) defencecontracts (DOT) org.uk wrote:

Why are you using an email address that is not yours to use?

On 28 Jan, 14:12, Steve Firth <%ste... (AT) malloc (DOT) co.uk> wrote:
What? So are you telling me then someone who posts on here with
@aol.com is the owner of AOL?

unit244 (AT) defencecontracts (DOT) org.uk wrote:

Tell me about the Defence contracts that you are involved with.


--
vulgarandmischevious

vulgarandmischevious wrote:
Tell me how an unregistered domain receives email...

============
No match for "defencecontracts.org.uk".

This domain name has not been registered.

WHOIS lookup made at 19:15:55 31-Jan-2007
============

On 29 Jan 2007 16:20:28 -0800, unit244 (AT) defencecontracts (DOT) org.uk wrote:

No, I did not say that nor did I say that you had to own the domain that
you use. You do however have to have the permission of the domain owner to
use a particular domain name. And you haven't got that.

OTOH you're such a thick cunt that no doubt you'll now try to be a barrack
room lawyer.