AutosTalk Forums  

Oops?

Miscellaneous UK car topics Other UK car topics (uk.rec.cars.misc)


Discuss Oops? in the Miscellaneous UK car topics forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
Dark Star
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Oops? - 11-30-2003 , 07:22 PM






Quote:
I don't advocate jumping red lights at all, just suggest that it's perhaps
not the best thing in the world to have cameras on lights with an unknown
amount of leeway. Your average just passed driver is shit scared of
getting
points because of the 6 point limit for 2 years, and is liable to be
pretty
bad at controlling the car as they slide towards the junction.
Add on top the non ABS brakes car with the brakes slammed on and the minor
problem of braking distances going through the roof (probably along with any
insurance premiums depending on the situation and outcome).

HAND




Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
Dave Plowman
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Oops? - 11-30-2003 , 07:37 PM






In article <1070236668.3400.0 (AT) lotis (DOT) uk.clara.net>,
Doki <doki (AT) SPAMMENOTspidar (DOT) com> wrote:
Quote:
is " gotten" English ?

Yes.
It is, but means "beget, forget, ill"

Using it as the past tense of 'got' is a nasty US habit.

--
*Can atheists get insurance for acts of God? *

Dave Plowman dave.sound (AT) argonet (DOT) co.uk London SW 12
RIP Acorn


Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old   
Pete M
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Oops? - 11-30-2003 , 07:55 PM



Terry Maxwell FIA made the world a better place for us by saying..
Quote:
It's on here ........

www.cheshire.police.uk/traffic_cameras.shtml

and it is this one:

A550 Welsh Rd Two Mills 60mph RED LIGHT

Now, based on this ...
http://www.leconcepts.com/radar/Web%...news/news7.htm

i.e. :-

"The state of the traffic signals is monitored and the loops are
energised when the red light is illuminated. If a vehicle crosses the
stop line 0.9 sec after this sequence, the camera is triggered,
taking two photographs. One is taken immediately and one a second
later to show the passage of the vehicle through the signals. The
date and time of the offence, together with the time which elapses
after the red light is illuminated, are recorded onto the film."

Looks like I am OK, as definitely well within 0.9 seconds when I
crossed the line, more like 0.001 seconds!!

Any comments on this?
Yup, yer fucked.

Three things.

1. The A550 is well known for big expensive crashes, As is the A41. The A41
/ A550 junction has a camera for a reason. Have a look at the junction next
time you speed through it. It's covered in broken glass, bits of reg plate,
bits of motorcyclists, and other accident paraphernalia.

2. It's Cheshire, so arguing in court is bloody expensive. I argued a
speeding ticket over the Runcorn bridge, and it cost me 5 points and £160.

3. It's a traffic light camera. Anyone who sets one off deserves the points
and the fine. Unless you *have* to go through, i.e. to let Emergency
services through, you deserve the points. No matter how late the flash is.


--
Pete M.

Golf Gti (For Sale)
Alfa Romeo 164 TS.
Wahey, I'm a proper petrolhead again!"
Liverpool, Great Britain.

"Oi, get your filthy hands off my desert"




Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old   
Conor
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Oops? - 11-30-2003 , 11:30 PM



In article <fGuyb.15962$tL2.135012375 (AT) news-text (DOT) cableinet.net>,
terry.maxwell (AT) royal-liver (DOT) com says...
Quote:
Was driving towards Liverpool at 8pm tonight, 60 mph limit road and doing
just under that, say 55 mph.

I go through the lights just as they were going red - couldn't stop safely
on the amber in the very wet conditions without going into a dangerous skid.

Didn't see the expected G*TSO flash behind me, so can I assume that the
scamera never went off? It was dark at 8pm obviously and a scamera flash
would have been obvious in my rear view mirrors.

Any comments on this?

That'd be the "scamera" put there to catch the plethora of cunts like
you that run red lights and nearly get T-Boned on a daily basis?


--
Conor

Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him.


Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old   
Peter
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Oops? - 12-01-2003 , 04:17 AM



Gareth A. <gareth (AT) nospamplease-attrill (DOT) co.uk> wrote

Quote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 23:20:49 -0000, "Doki" <doki (AT) SPAMMENOTspidar (DOT) com
wrote:

Tony Sutton <Tony (AT) hypertony (DOT) co.ukNOSPAM> wrote in message
news:bqdu0k$jvm$1 (AT) ngspool-d02 (DOT) news.aol.com...
"Terry Maxwell FIA" <terry.maxwell (AT) royal-liver (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:fGuyb.15962$tL2.135012375 (AT) news-text (DOT) cableinet.net...

Looks like I am OK, as definitely well within 0.9 seconds when I crossed
the
line, more like 0.001 seconds!!

Any comments on this?


You'll never know... the police could be greedy and wants money!

Hang on tight and wait for the post... if you didn't get anything, then
you
got away.

I reckon as it didn't seem to flash he'll have gotten away with it. You
notice Gatso flashes in the daytime, you'd need to be pretty blind to miss
them at night. IMO the time allowed for going through red lights (IYSWIM)
really ought to be published, could save the odd person from skidding into a
junction as the lights change rather than going through on amber.

Erm, as far as I am aware there is very little defence for crossing on
red. I don't recall going through any red lights and have never had to
brake *dangerously* to avoid doing so - pretty harshly, occasionally
but even then I was probably approaching the juction a little quickly.

If the road was wet shouldn't the driver have been approaching the
junction slower, in anticipation of the lights changing?

The highway code spells it out pretty clearly - amber is not "green,
but hurry up as I'm going to change soon!"

http://www.highwaycode.gov.uk/signs01.shtml

Gareth
So we're supposed to slow up for lights? I've never been sure about
whether we should slow up for them and nobody I've spoken to really
knows either. On my first driving test I went over a red and since I
passed I've been worried about red lights. I think I'm pretty good at
lights now but I only need to hesitate for about half a second to miss
the amber. I usually stop on amber quite early, I love it when the
person behind is going mad and telling their passenger that I could've
made it lol. Some drivers just don't have a clue about the highway
code!


Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old   
Steve Knight
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Oops? - 12-01-2003 , 04:34 AM



Quote:
That'd be the "scamera" put there to catch the plethora of c*nts like
you that run red lights and nearly get T-Boned on a daily basis?
Obviously Conor you don't know the law.

Like me, you mistakenly believe the Highway Code when it says an amber light
means 'stop'.

In fact, as many drivers know (particularly here in London) amber means
'accelerate hard' and red only means 'stop' after it has been on for 3 or 4
seconds - until then you're allowed to go right through it.

I'm no big fan of speed cameras but I'd have a traffic light camera on every
junction.



--
Remove Xs to reply direct




Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old   
Lordy
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Oops? - 12-01-2003 , 10:10 AM



Quote:
I go through the lights just as they were going red - couldn't stop
safely on the amber in the very wet conditions without going into a
dangerous skid.

Didn't see the expected G*TSO flash behind me, so can I assume that
the scamera never went off?
The sensors are not triggered the instant the lights turn to red,
there's a little delay. That, and the fact that there was no flash,
would rather unfortunately indicate that you got away with it.

Quote:
There were no speed camera markings on the road
Because it's not a speed camera...


--
Lordy


Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old   
Doki
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Oops? - 12-01-2003 , 10:43 AM




Lordy <spam (AT) recycle (DOT) bin> wrote

Quote:
I go through the lights just as they were going red - couldn't stop
safely on the amber in the very wet conditions without going into a
dangerous skid.

Didn't see the expected G*TSO flash behind me, so can I assume that
the scamera never went off?

The sensors are not triggered the instant the lights turn to red,
there's a little delay. That, and the fact that there was no flash,
would rather unfortunately indicate that you got away with it.

There were no speed camera markings on the road

Because it's not a speed camera...
AFAIK the sensors on the road also record your speed as you pass over the
white line. I imagine this is so that people who've just stopped over the
line, been shunted by someone behind etc. can dispute the ticket.




Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old   
Terry Maxwell FIA
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Oops? - 12-01-2003 , 10:43 AM



Pete M <pete.murray (AT) NO (DOT) SPAM.blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

Quote:
Terry Maxwell FIA made the world a better place for us by saying..

It's on here ........

www.cheshire.police.uk/traffic_cameras.shtml

and it is this one:

A550 Welsh Rd Two Mills 60mph RED LIGHT

Now, based on this ...
http://www.leconcepts.com/radar/Web%...news/news7.htm

i.e. :-

"The state of the traffic signals is monitored and the loops are
energised when the red light is illuminated. If a vehicle crosses the
stop line 0.9 sec after this sequence, the camera is triggered,
taking two photographs. One is taken immediately and one a second
later to show the passage of the vehicle through the signals. The
date and time of the offence, together with the time which elapses
after the red light is illuminated, are recorded onto the film."

Looks like I am OK, as definitely well within 0.9 seconds when I
crossed the line, more like 0.001 seconds!!

Any comments on this?

Yup, yer fucked.

Three things.

1. The A550 is well known for big expensive crashes, As is the A41.
The A41 / A550 junction has a camera for a reason. Have a look at the
junction next time you speed through it. It's covered in broken
glass, bits of reg plate, bits of motorcyclists, and other accident
paraphernalia.

2. It's Cheshire, so arguing in court is bloody expensive. I argued a
speeding ticket over the Runcorn bridge, and it cost me 5 points and
£160.

3. It's a traffic light camera. Anyone who sets one off deserves the
points and the fine. Unless you *have* to go through, i.e. to let
Emergency services through, you deserve the points. No matter how
late the flash is.
There was no flash though.




Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old   
Terry Maxwell FIA
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Oops? - 12-01-2003 , 10:44 AM



Lordy <spam (AT) recycle (DOT) bin> wrote:

Quote:
I go through the lights just as they were going red - couldn't stop
safely on the amber in the very wet conditions without going into a
dangerous skid.

Didn't see the expected G*TSO flash behind me, so can I assume that
the scamera never went off?

The sensors are not triggered the instant the lights turn to red,
there's a little delay. That, and the fact that there was no flash,
would rather unfortunately indicate that you got away with it.

Unhelpful opinion. Stopping would have been dangerous.




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.