![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
"AndrewR" <andrew (AT) rockface (DOT) freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:3e3r14F12ih6U1 (AT) individual (DOT) net... Then the difference is merely cultural. How would it be if the country pub sold reefers? It wouldn't be alright at all because often the only means of getting to the country pub is by car and if, while there, you take drugs to get high then you would not be fit to drive home. |
|
S'funny you know, but in all of the years I've been drink, with a wide variety of people from all walks of life, I can't think of any occasion where somebody who wasn't drinking alcohol, for what-ever reason, opted for an alcohol free lager rather than a traditional soft-drink. To me that suggests that those people didn't drink alcoholic drinks for the taste either. I'm not sure that I follow your there at all. What are you suggesting? That people only drink beer or wine to get drunk? If so then I would say that you are talking out of your backside. |
|
I would say that the main difference between alcohol and cannabis is that it has been drummed into you that drug use is bad and, therefore, any argument that comes from somebody who supports drug use must also be bad. Lets face it - those of us who are regulars on uk.rec.cars.misc do know that you have a long history of being unable to think for yourself. Who am I thinking for then? |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
Uno Hoo! wrote: "AndrewR" <andrew (AT) rockface (DOT) freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:3e3r14F12ih6U1 (AT) individual (DOT) net... Then the difference is merely cultural. How would it be if the country pub sold reefers? It wouldn't be alright at all because often the only means of getting to the country pub is by car and if, while there, you take drugs to get high then you would not be fit to drive home. But 4 people could go to a reefer-selling pub in one car and three of those people could drink or get stoned, leaving one to drive home. Just like four friends driving to a pub for a drink. |
|
S'funny you know, but in all of the years I've been drink, with a wide variety of people from all walks of life, I can't think of any occasion where somebody who wasn't drinking alcohol, for what-ever reason, opted for an alcohol free lager rather than a traditional soft-drink. To me that suggests that those people didn't drink alcoholic drinks for the taste either. I'm not sure that I follow your there at all. What are you suggesting? That people only drink beer or wine to get drunk? If so then I would say that you are talking out of your backside. What I am saying is that people drink alcoholic drinks for the alcohol. Wether they're getting a slight buzz, a bit tipsy or off their face is their personal preference, but they are choosing to inject alcohol because of its effects. My point was that alcohol-free beers are poor sellers because the option of having the taste without the drug is not a popular one. |
|
I would say that the main difference between alcohol and cannabis is that it has been drummed into you that drug use is bad and, therefore, any argument that comes from somebody who supports drug use must also be bad. Lets face it - those of us who are regulars on uk.rec.cars.misc do know that you have a long history of being unable to think for yourself. Who am I thinking for then? You are thinking the way that you've been taught to - that legal drugs are OK and illegal ones are not, that people who partake of the former can be fine members of society while those who partake of the latter are criminals. You fail to realise that the distinction is largely arbitary. In your other post you mention the body of medical evidence showing the long term harm of cannabis use, but you must be aware that alcohol and tobacco are both far more harmful, yet fully legal. What you have, my friend, is a nice little piece of double-think. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
See above. Most people that I know drink alcohol for the taste - not for any after-effect. |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
Well, we'll just have to agree to disagree on that one. I drink because I like the taste and because I am thirsty - I do not drink for any after effect. Believe it or not. .... Well, that's your opinion but I dispute it on the grounds that I have covered many times before. The sole point of cannabis and other illegal drugs is to get high. Alcohol can be used in moderation purely for its taste and without any need for intoxication. *That* is the difference and that is my argument. You may well disagree with my and that is your prerogative. |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Uno Hoo!" <kev (AT) dropthisbigfoot (DOT) com> wrote in message news:d5i4g7$en9$1 (AT) newsg3 (DOT) svr.pol.co.uk... Yes indeed - could only have come from the ravaged brain of a druggie! Why do people think that taking drugs is a good thing to do? I would far rather retain control of my faculties! |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave (AT) davenoise (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:4d67491e15dave (AT) davenoise (DOT) co.uk... In article <d5i4g7$en9$1 (AT) newsg3 (DOT) svr.pol.co.uk>, Uno Hoo! <kev (AT) dropthisbigfoot (DOT) com> wrote: And then they can all drive home stoned. What a wonderful idea. Yes indeed - could only have come from the ravaged brain of a druggie! So rather like country pubs with car parks? There is a distinct difference. Many people, like me, do not drink to get drunk. Also, you can visit a country pub, and have an enjoyable drink and/or meal without any use of alcohol. By contrast the whole point of taking cannabis is to get high. I don't think I've ever heard the argument that people take cannabis because they enjoy the taste! |
|
Kev |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <d5ig9p$eau$1 (AT) newsg4 (DOT) svr.pol.co.uk>, Uno Hoo! <kev (AT) dropthisbigfoot (DOT) com> wrote: See above. Most people that I know drink alcohol for the taste - not for any after-effect. I just think you're fooling yourself. |
|
People drink alcoholic drinks for the influence alcohol has on them. Just try asking a first time drinker - like a child - whether they actually enjoy the taste. Because they don't. It's acquired. |
|
Plenty of non alcoholic drinks are enjoyable first time around. |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Uno Hoo!" <kev (AT) dropthisbigfoot (DOT) com> wrote in message news:d5ihc7$hpu$1 (AT) news7 (DOT) svr.pol.co.uk... Well, we'll just have to agree to disagree on that one. I drink because I like the taste and because I am thirsty - I do not drink for any after effect. Believe it or not. ... Well, that's your opinion but I dispute it on the grounds that I have covered many times before. The sole point of cannabis and other illegal drugs is to get high. Alcohol can be used in moderation purely for its taste and without any need for intoxication. *That* is the difference and that is my argument. You may well disagree with my and that is your prerogative. Er - Kev, you do know that alcohol even used in moderation has effects? Not necessarily as obvious as those obtained by drinking ten pints of lager, but the glasses of wine served at social functions are there for more reasons than taste, and even one will do something to all but the most hardened drinker. This applies to other drugs too... |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
Uno Hoo! wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave (AT) davenoise (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:4d67491e15dave (AT) davenoise (DOT) co.uk... In article <d5i4g7$en9$1 (AT) newsg3 (DOT) svr.pol.co.uk>, Uno Hoo! <kev (AT) dropthisbigfoot (DOT) com> wrote: And then they can all drive home stoned. What a wonderful idea. Yes indeed - could only have come from the ravaged brain of a druggie! So rather like country pubs with car parks? There is a distinct difference. Many people, like me, do not drink to get drunk. Also, you can visit a country pub, and have an enjoyable drink and/or meal without any use of alcohol. By contrast the whole point of taking cannabis is to get high. I don't think I've ever heard the argument that people take cannabis because they enjoy the taste! Yeah, like you first drank alcohol because you thought it'd taste nice ! |
#20
| |||
| |||
|
|
"AndrewR" <andrew (AT) rockface (DOT) freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:3e3v7kF12m3cU1 (AT) individual (DOT) net... What I am saying is that people drink alcoholic drinks for the alcohol. Wether they're getting a slight buzz, a bit tipsy or off their face is their personal preference, but they are choosing to inject alcohol because of its effects. My point was that alcohol-free beers are poor sellers because the option of having the taste without the drug is not a popular one. Well, we'll just have to agree to disagree on that one. I drink because I like the taste and because I am thirsty - I do not drink for any after effect. Believe it or not. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |