![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#331
| |||
| |||
|
|
Uno Hoo! wrote: "Alistair J Murray" <news (AT) fluffy (DOT) f9.co.uk> wrote in message news:gntal2-dkt.ln1 (AT) film (DOT) fluffy... [...] I'd have been inclined to expect a blip in casualties as everyone went mad with the freedom, however it didn't seem to happen in Montana. Because the roads in Montana where the limits were removed bore no comparison with UK roads. The overall traffic density may be lower in Montana and their road building program might not lag demand as much as ours but otherwise they are not that different. Unlimited A-bahns have traffic densities more similar to those in the UK and are reasonably safe. IoM roads closely resemble most of those in rural Scotland yet don't run with blood. There is AFAIK no evidence for *blanket* arbitrary extra-urban speed limits reducing accidents (not severity), there is evidence supporting their removal. A -- Trade Oil in € |
#332
| |||
| |||
|
|
The point of making drugs cheaper is a key one because it does two things; 1. It reduces the cost of maintaining a habit - hopefully to the point where crime is no longer required. 2. It pushes the current supply chain of criminals out of the picture. |
#333
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hate to point it out. But if you buy a bottle of water from a garage It does!! |
#334
| |||
| |||
|
|
"AndrewR" <andrew (AT) rockface (DOT) freeserve.co.uk> wrote The point of making drugs cheaper is a key one because it does two things; 1. It reduces the cost of maintaining a habit - hopefully to the point where crime is no longer required. 2. It pushes the current supply chain of criminals out of the picture. I understand what you're getting at, but I strongly suspect that other arguments would weigh in and screw up the logic. First, there's going to be an issue around making something available on the cheap and thus stimulating demand for something that certainly isn't good for you. Imagine a government reducing the tax on cigarettes to £1 a packet, for example. Second, any government is going to look longingly at pills costing £1 a throw legally where previously they used to be £2 a throw illegally, and they're going to succumb to the temptation to ratchet the tax up, so that within a few years your fix of cake costs you more than before. You're already hooked so whatcha gonna do? |
|
This will then allow the intercession of arbitrageurs into the market, who start trucking in drugs like they now truck in "illegal" cigarettes. In fact the cigarette analogy is a useful one - in theory, in a genuine single market, cigarette smuggling wouldn't be smuggling at all. The fact that it is speaks volumes about the attitude of governments; the so-called single market isn't single at all if government revenues are at risk. |
|
Nice idea but I can't believe it will work. If it's £5 a packet for normal cigarettes, a pack of 20 spliffs is going to be at least double or treble that, and I imagine that makes them pricier than they are now? Which will allow a slightly different type of criminal back into the supply chain. |
#335
| |||
| |||
|
#336
| |||
| |||
|
|
Alcohol doesn't have any taste or smell. |
|
Its neutral until flavoured. |
|
its also clear until coloured. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |