![]() | |
#31
| |||
| |||
|
|
uk.rec.drugs.cannabis , Uno Hoo! , kev (AT) dropthisbigfoot (DOT) com d5imi6$ln2$1 (AT) news7 (DOT) svr.pol.co.uk Sat, 7 May 2005 16:23:52 +0100 Can you equate cannabis taker with 'sensible'? Compared to who ? . With a none cannabis taker? Can you be a bit more specific . |
#32
| |||
| |||
|
|
"AndrewR" <andrew (AT) rockface (DOT) freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:3e41fgF1481iU1 (AT) individual (DOT) net... Basically your arguement boils down to; "Alcohol should be legal because lots of people like it, but cannabis shouldn't be legal because I don't like it and I don't like the idea of people taking a drug purely for its narcotic effect". That's a pretty poor argument, really. Well, it's an argument that holds sway in most countries in the world isn't it? |
#33
| |||
| |||
|
|
If you wish. Using cannabis is against the law. By using it you risk prosecution. That is not a sensible thing to do. Ergo there is no such thing as a sensible cannabis user. |
#34
| |||
| |||
|
|
Uno Hoo! wrote: If you wish. Using cannabis is against the law. By using it you risk prosecution. That is not a sensible thing to do. Ergo there is no such thing as a sensible cannabis user. Cars are sometimes involved in fatal crashes. By travelling in a car you risk being involved in a fatal crash. That is not sensible risk. Ergo there is no such thing as a sensible car user. Sunlight causes skin cancer. By exposing yourself to sunshine you risk skin cancer. That is not a sensible thing to do. Ergo there is no such thing as a sensible t-shirt wearer. Everybody who lives eventually dies. By living you take the risk that you will die. Dying is a bad thing. Ergo there is no such thing as a sensible person. Do you spot the flaw in Mr Argument? |
#35
| |||
| |||
|
|
"AndrewR" <andrew (AT) rockface (DOT) freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:3e41htF13hgoU1 (AT) individual (DOT) net... Uno Hoo! wrote: Well, actually, that is exactly what I thought. In fact I thought it must be very special indeed as only adults were legally allowed to drink it. ! You could at least get the law right; anybody aged 5 or over is allowed to drink alcohol. Pedantics. |
#36
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Uno Hoo!" <kev (AT) dropthisbigfoot (DOT) com> wrote in message news:d5i4g7$en9$1 (AT) newsg3 (DOT) svr.pol.co.uk... Yes indeed - could only have come from the ravaged brain of a druggie! Why do people think that taking drugs is a good thing to do? I would far rather retain control of my faculties! I occassionally smoked cannabis a couple of years ago to alleviate the |
#37
| |||
| |||
|
|
"AndrewR" <andrew (AT) rockface (DOT) freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:3e3r14F12ih6U1 (AT) individual (DOT) net... Then the difference is merely cultural. How would it be if the country pub sold reefers? It wouldn't be alright at all because often the only means of getting to the country pub is by car and if, while there, you take drugs to get high then you would not be fit to drive home. |
|
I would say that the main difference between alcohol and cannabis is that it has been drummed into you that drug use is bad and, therefore, any argument that comes from somebody who supports drug use must also be bad. Lets face it - those of us who are regulars on uk.rec.cars.misc do know that you have a long history of being unable to think for yourself. Who am I thinking for then? |
#38
| |||
| |||
|
|
"GH" <invalid (AT) ganjahost (DOT) co.uk.INVALID> wrote in message news:MPG.1ce6e82d28107696989868 (AT) no-cancel (DOT) newsreader.com... You mention the word "high" quite a few times - would you care to give your definition of what high is ? . I use the word 'high' because it is a term that is generally used to denote the form of intoxication derived from drug use rather than alcohol use (yes I know that will argue that alcohol is a drug as well). I have never taken a controlled drug in my life and so have no personal idea of how to describe the effect (and yes, I realise you will state now state that I am poorly placed to criticise something that I have not tried - but I don't need to practise paedophilia to know that it is wrong). |
#39
| |||
| |||
|
|
"AndrewR" <andrew (AT) rockface (DOT) freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:3e41fgF1481iU1 (AT) individual (DOT) net... Basically your arguement boils down to; "Alcohol should be legal because lots of people like it, but cannabis shouldn't be legal because I don't like it and I don't like the idea of people taking a drug purely for its narcotic effect". That's a pretty poor argument, really. Well, it's an argument that holds sway in most countries in the world isn't it? |
#40
| |||
| |||
|
|
uk.rec.drugs.cannabis , Uno Hoo! , kev (AT) dropthisbigfoot (DOT) com d5ifss$obe$1 (AT) news8 (DOT) svr.pol.co.uk Sat, 7 May 2005 14:30:06 +0100 Then the difference is merely cultural. How would it be if the country pub sold reefers? It wouldn't be alright at all because often the only means of getting to the country pub is by car and if, while there, you take drugs to get high then you would not be fit to drive home. Do you think there would ten foot high sign saying summit like .... you are not allowed to leave here until you are completely whacked out your skull :-) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |