![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||||
| |||||
|
|
"Zimmy" <z@y.x> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: If the policeman says stickers in your window, or a 'bad attitude' is careless driving then its careless driving. In practice, who is going to argue, when its your word against theirs in court? It's not. There'll be this little thing called "evidence" required. Yes, but you've already been convicted and fined by the policeman who is judge and jury, no evidence required. Can we just take all the arguments as read, and skip to the part where you admit that you can't read, and that you don't understand the concept of accepting an FPN _as a voluntary alternative to a prosecution_? It's just that it gets very tedious going over it repeatedly. |
|
That's very naive. IME policemen are not angels and many are just there for the power trip, and if they can screw you over, they will. Mmm. You sound like you've got an axe to grind. Been nicked a few times, have you? No, I've only had 3pts for speeding, but yes I do have an axe to grind. There is no way I could have doing the speed that the mobile camera said (my GPS was nowhere near it and my passenger agreed) Alan! You've morphed! |
|
Clue: The mobile camera isn't even operated by "policemen". |
|
Yes, I could cite various TV documentaries showing how they move to gun while measuring to provide an increased reading You could, yes. Then you could sit back and watch whilst you get laughed at, |
|
On other occasions when I have been stopped randomly I usually get the impression that, to the police you're guilty until proven innocent. That's because you didn't get "stopped randomly" - you got chosen to be stopped for some reason which made you and your car stand out from the rest of the traffic. |
#12
| |||||
| |||||
|
|
Can we just take all the arguments as read, and skip to the part where you admit that you can't read, and that you don't understand the concept of accepting an FPN _as a voluntary alternative to a prosecution_? It's just that it gets very tedious going over it repeatedly. Read the rest of my post, again, you might get the point eventually but I doubt it. |
|
No, I've only had 3pts for speeding, but yes I do have an axe to grind. There is no way I could have doing the speed that the mobile camera said (my GPS was nowhere near it and my passenger agreed) Alan! You've morphed! Eh? |
|
Clue: The mobile camera isn't even operated by "policemen". Our local partnership wear the same uniforms, that's good enough for me. |
|
Yes, I could cite various TV documentaries showing how they move to gun while measuring to provide an increased reading You could, yes. Then you could sit back and watch whilst you get laughed at, Exactly my point. |
|
Go back to your own naive little world of black hats and white hats, or consider a career in the police if you haven't already. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:11:22 +0100, Conor <conor (AT) gmx (DOT) co.uk> wrote: In article <3g1ba59ts73f57s1927d36pelpk7ohmsqk (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, Usenet Nutter says... Is there a ruling about the number of things you can have stuck on a car's rear window? No. Thank you .A sensible answer at last but I'll bet the Traffic Cops could think of something if they put their mind to it . |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
Is there a ruling about the number of things you can have stuck on a car's rear window? I was sitting in a queue of traffic today and a smallish car in front had a male and a females name below the window but on the window itself they had about 6 stickers saying different things and also a small teddy hanging there . |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Usenet Nutter" <individualnet (AT) takeoutmyteethgmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:3g1ba59ts73f57s1927d36pelpk7ohmsqk (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... Is there a ruling about the number of things you can have stuck on a car's rear window? I was sitting in a queue of traffic today and a smallish car in front had a male and a females name below the window but on the window itself they had about 6 stickers saying different things and also a small teddy hanging there . Please refrain from posting this here, it is against our charter. Since when did uk.rec.cars.misc have a charter? |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
Beatrice wrote: "Usenet Nutter" <individualnet (AT) takeoutmyteethgmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:3g1ba59ts73f57s1927d36pelpk7ohmsqk (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... Is there a ruling about the number of things you can have stuck on a car's rear window? I was sitting in a queue of traffic today and a smallish car in front had a male and a females name below the window but on the window itself they had about 6 stickers saying different things and also a small teddy hanging there . Please refrain from posting this here, it is against our charter. Since when did uk.rec.cars.misc have a charter? Don't be so silly, either respect the charter or don't post here. |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Pete M" <pete.murray (AT) SPAMFREEblueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:h9kpou$qcf$1 (AT) news (DOT) eternal-september.org... Beatrice wrote: "Usenet Nutter" <individualnet (AT) takeoutmyteethgmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:3g1ba59ts73f57s1927d36pelpk7ohmsqk (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... Is there a ruling about the number of things you can have stuck on a car's rear window? I was sitting in a queue of traffic today and a smallish car in front had a male and a females name below the window but on the window itself they had about 6 stickers saying different things and also a small teddy hanging there . Please refrain from posting this here, it is against our charter. Since when did uk.rec.cars.misc have a charter? Don't be so silly, either respect the charter or don't post here. |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <Ze2dnSqc3v06vSPXnZ2dnUVZ8lOdnZ2d (AT) brightview (DOT) co.uk>, me (AT) me (DOT) beatrsice says... "Pete M" <pete.murray (AT) SPAMFREEblueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:h9kpou$qcf$1 (AT) news (DOT) eternal-september.org... Beatrice wrote: "Usenet Nutter" <individualnet (AT) takeoutmyteethgmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:3g1ba59ts73f57s1927d36pelpk7ohmsqk (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... Is there a ruling about the number of things you can have stuck on a car's rear window? I was sitting in a queue of traffic today and a smallish car in front had a male and a females name below the window but on the window itself they had about 6 stickers saying different things and also a small teddy hanging there . Please refrain from posting this here, it is against our charter. Since when did uk.rec.cars.misc have a charter? Don't be so silly, either respect the charter or don't post here. It's a car related question; what's the problem? -- It clearly infringes section 7 of the chaRTER. |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Halmyre" <no.spam (AT) this (DOT) address> wrote in message news:MPG.2528378d2d2c6244989ffc (AT) news (DOT) tesco.net... In article <Ze2dnSqc3v06vSPXnZ2dnUVZ8lOdnZ2d (AT) brightview (DOT) co.uk>, me (AT) me (DOT) beatrsice says... "Pete M" <pete.murray (AT) SPAMFREEblueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:h9kpou$qcf$1 (AT) news (DOT) eternal-september.org... Beatrice wrote: "Usenet Nutter" <individualnet (AT) takeoutmyteethgmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:3g1ba59ts73f57s1927d36pelpk7ohmsqk (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... Is there a ruling about the number of things you can have stuck on a car's rear window? I was sitting in a queue of traffic today and a smallish car in front had a male and a females name below the window but on the window itself they had about 6 stickers saying different things and also a small teddy hanging there . Please refrain from posting this here, it is against our charter. Since when did uk.rec.cars.misc have a charter? Don't be so silly, either respect the charter or don't post here. It's a car related question; what's the problem? -- It clearly infringes section 7 of the chaRTER. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |