Steve Walker wrote:
Quote:
Maybe the halo effect of the range-topper, but ISTR that all models were
considered to handle exceptionally well. |
They did, apparently. As did the Peugeot 405 and so forth. With 1 or 2
people in.
What amazed me about the Carisma was the reputation for poor handling,
when 5-up, it handled safely and responsively. I know that the 405 I had
suffered with people in the back, not terribly but enough. Surely how a
car handles when full of people is important in a family car
I know the Carisma had a silly name and really was quite dull, but it
wasn't an incompetent car in my experience of it. I liked the GDi engine
a lot, and generally felt less contorted out of shape after driving it
compared to my 306 Cabriolet or even things like Ford Mondeoa.
It's amazing just how tempting a car's marketing or name makes being
unpleasant about it. Remember the Nissan Almera? "The car they didn't
want you to drive". It would be hard enough resisting "So I won't!"
comments if it was RWD, V8, did 50mpg and cost 50p, let alone a
mid-priced average family hatchback.
Or the Lancia Dedra.
Or... well, you get the idea.
Richard
--
RichardK - 1980s in a can.
http://www.dmc12.demon.co.uk/music/
Retro computing -
http://www.dmc12.demon.co.uk/retrotech/
Cars - 2004 Beetle Cabrio, 1989 Supra 3.0i, 1990 Sera
MidiGuitar, Enterprise 128, AU/X. Apple 77-04. See links