![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
John J. Lee <jjl (AT) pobox (DOT) com> wrote: Any opinions on this? I'm expecting to do 50 miles/day commute weekdays for maybe a few months, then moving so maybe 10 or 20 miles/day after that. Some long journeys on weekends. Reliability and overall economy are the top priotities. At the moment, I'm thinking about 3 door Toyota Yaris 1.0 (probably 2002) or Nissan Micra (2003 model). What should I get? Definnitely not the Renault Clio with a Nissan badge.... |
#12
| ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
"DervMan" <thedervman (AT) gmail (DOT) com> writes: "John J. Lee" <jjl (AT) pobox (DOT) com> wrote in message news:874pozagqj.fsf (AT) pobox (DOT) com... [...] I'm expecting to do 50 miles/day commute weekdays for maybe a few months, then moving so maybe 10 or 20 miles/day after that. Some long journeys on weekends. Reliability and overall economy are the top priotities. Overall economy? Go for something larger and older then. Interesting. So what sort of thing, at what age, hits the sweet spot for economy at tolerable reliability over 3-5 years? |
|
One problem is that I'm clueless with car maintenance. Not just an issue after buying it -- it seems a lot easier to buy a 4-5 year old car with reasonable confidence than it is to get an eight year old one. Maybe I can get a carhead friend / friend-of-friend to check it... |
|
Also, aren't I going to lose out a fair bit on reliability with a 5-10 year old car? |
|
I'm not sure what to expect, learned to drive late, only been driving three years and didn't need to use that old banger much. Now I'm going to be commuting by car, I actually care about reliability. |
|
I also wonder what will happen over the next five years with petrol prices, road pricing, environmental taxes etc. |
|
OK, probably not much, Gordon Brown has too many votes to lose there still :-) [...] Seems the Micra isn't far behind in terms of reliability. To be honest though, at this age they both ought to be reliable. I'm trying to think 3-5 years ahead too. |
|
I won't get a pre-2003 Micra: too ugly :-) They're better looking than the modern "thing." Not to my eyes, I really hate the old ones with the headlights further forward. It's not that I love the new ones -- they're just tolerable! |
|
The very latest ones are certainly even stranger, I read somebody describe them as looking "amazed" which seems to fit :-))) |
|
Also wondering if 1.0 litre Yaris isn't a bit underpowered even for a small car. Well it depends on your perspective. It isn't exactly quick, but for what it is, it's an unburstable piece of kit. 67 bhp from a 1.0 and it'll produce all of those horses all day, every day. I'm coming from the "enough power to get out of the way of idiots" perspective. |
|
I suppose that's a bit of a "how long is a piece of string" question though -- depends what the idiots are driving ;-) |
|
On the other hand presumably the smaller engine translates into higher fuel efficiency. That depends though. In day to day use for most people the Yaris 1.3 is marginally thirstier. You'd not notice it. Unless you spend a lot of time in traffic - and you're not going to be - the 1.3 is effectively the same as the 1.0 with fuel *but* is materially quicker. It's not fast, but it isn't a slouch either. I'd go for the 1.3. The only reason to get the 1.0 is because you can't find a 1.3 in the right specification, condition and age... They seem to be more expensive than the 1.0s. Was I misled by the small sample I looked at on autotrader? |
|
And on balance I think the Yaris is probably a bit less ugly, but there's not a lot in it ;-) Pah. When the Micra was designed, Nissan were trying to make it look ugly. It dropped down the fugly tree hitting every branch. Actually having seen a Yaris "in the metal" parked today, I take back what I said about it being ugly (not beautiful, but not ugly). I've yet to notice a 2003 Micra on the road, there must be lots out there... |
|
Anything else in the same category I should be looking at? Lots to avoid. ![]() :-) [...] I'm trying not to point you towards the Skoda Fabia because personally I think the interior is awful and it's not attractive *but* it makes sense in this company. For your economy bias you either want the 1.2 three cylinder petrol or a diesel. The 1.4 four cylinder petrol is not all that economical. This definitely fits in the ugly category :-) I guess I could suffer that, and I don't really care about the interior. |
|
No disrespect to your nickname, but a family member with a lung problem keeps the disadvantages of diesels high up in my mind (except maybe the very newest ones, perhaps they're cleaner I don't know). So I guess it would be 1.2 petrol. |
|
You might also want to find a Daihatsu Sirion. They have, erm, unusual looks, but the three cylinder 1.0 is especially miserly with fuel. cue "Postman Pat" theme |
|
Hmm... Thanks for all the comments, lots to think about! |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Zimmy" <x@y.z> writes: [...] I had a new Micra last year for 2 weeks as a courtesy car. Although it was reasonably nippy, it had the most unsupportive seats and lightest power steering I've ever seen. Thus when going round corners you had to hang onto the steering wheel to prevent yourself from sliding over onto the passenger seat whilst simultaneously try to keep the steering wheel in the same position. I was glad to get my old Polo back (which isn't exactly renowned for its handling). Having driven a 15-year-old Fiesta (with power windscreen wipers ;-) for three years, admittedly with very light usage, I'm doubting I'll even notice bad power steering! Is this power steering thing something that's going to trouble me on 30 min drives on relatively small country roads? Or longer drives? When people said "power steering" in the past, I always just thought "parking". |
|
I can see how nasty seats might get painful (literally) for commuting, though, so thanks for the warning... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |