![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I would not set foot into a Lowes store again unless somebody had a twelve gauge shotgun duct taped to the back of my head and was forcing me in there. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
"RickyBobby" <nasca... (AT) cox (DOT) net> wrote innews:iA5bm.59299$rg4.8628 (AT) newsfe02 (DOT) iad: I would not set foot into a Lowes store again unless somebody had a twelve gauge shotgun duct taped to the back of my head and was forcing me in there. That wouldn't work so well. *It would be better if the gun was a little further away, so you get some spread on the shot. John |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
I too feel that Montoya was blatantly robbed by the old redneck white boys club. Can't be letting them funny talking foreigners be winning a white bread race. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
"RickyBobby" <nascar42 (AT) cox (DOT) net> wrote in news:iA5bm.59299$rg4.8628 (AT) newsfe02 (DOT) iad: I would not set foot into a Lowes store again unless somebody had a twelve gauge shotgun duct taped to the back of my head and was forcing me in there. That wouldn't work so well. It would be better if the gun was a little further away, so you get some spread on the shot. John |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
"John McCoy" <igopogo (AT) ix (DOT) netcom.com> wrote in message news:Xns9C54CC39A6FEApogosupernews (AT) 216 (DOT) 168.3.30... "RickyBobby" <nascar42 (AT) cox (DOT) net> wrote in news:iA5bm.59299$rg4.8628 (AT) newsfe02 (DOT) iad: I would not set foot into a Lowes store again unless somebody had a twelve gauge shotgun duct taped to the back of my head and was forcing me in there. That wouldn't work so well. It would be better if the gun was a little further away, so you get some spread on the shot. John Ahhh, but you don't need spread for that scenario. In fact, less spread would be better. -- -Mike- mmarlowREMOVE (AT) windstream (DOT) net |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
NASCAR has all the credibility of WWE, and as I have stated before, some of what NASCAR does during a race scripts the predictable ending of some races. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:40:46 GMT, Chuck_Steak (AT) nospam (DOT) com (Chuck Steak) wrote: So in other words, had NASCAR turned the other cheek, and said "gee.... he was only a tad over the5MPH buffer we already give them, let's let it slide this time.." That would be MORE credible?????? I was pulling for him to win it. Would have been nice to see someone else win the big one for change. So it's not like I'm a JPM hater... |
|
You have completely missed the point, JJ was the chosen winner of the race. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
JJ was the chosen winner of the race. |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Tim Shelton <noemail1... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote innews:nsdr65pnj8vtg2d1h3q8pp57tplt9n4iqd (AT) ccr (DOT) org: JJ was the chosen winner of the race. This is a little like the "what's the benefit to NASCAR screwing with Mayfield's drug test" question: what's the benefit to NASCAR by choosing Johnson to win the race? He's a very good driver, but he's boring as all get out, he doesn't have any real fan base. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |