AutosTalk Forums  

ARCA: Older than NASCAR?

Nascar NASCAR and other professional stock car racing (rec.autos.sport.nascar)


Discuss ARCA: Older than NASCAR? in the Nascar forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Pup
 
Posts: n/a

Default ARCA: Older than NASCAR? - 03-21-2006 , 08:49 AM






I read somewhere a long time ago that ARCA started before NASCAR was
established and Big Bill France had a hand in it. Arcaracing.com says
it didn't start until 1953 as the Midwest Association for Race Cars
(MARC). Has anyone heard anything to the contrary?

Pup
*88*


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
bigspud
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: ARCA: Older than NASCAR? - 03-21-2006 , 03:53 PM






On 21 Mar 2006 05:49:25 -0800, Pup
wrote:

Quote:
I read somewhere a long time ago that ARCA started before NASCAR was
established and Big Bill France had a hand in it. Arcaracing.com says
it didn't start until 1953 as the Midwest Association for Race Cars
(MARC). Has anyone heard anything to the contrary?

Pup
*88*
al gore invented arca in 1912, then
the internet in 1980.


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
John McCoy
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: ARCA: Older than NASCAR? - 03-21-2006 , 09:47 PM



"Pup" <puppinator7 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in news:1142948965.402961.311910
@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:

Quote:
I read somewhere a long time ago that ARCA started before NASCAR was
established and Big Bill France had a hand in it. Arcaracing.com says
it didn't start until 1953 as the Midwest Association for Race Cars
(MARC). Has anyone heard anything to the contrary?
Are you sure you're not thinking of IMCA (the folks who run
an extremely popular modified series)? IMCA goes back to
the WW1 era.

John


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Pup
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: ARCA: Older than NASCAR? - 03-23-2006 , 12:10 PM



I THOUGHT it might have possibly been IMCA...but I can't find anything
historical at their website to support that either.

Pup
*88*


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
John McCoy
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: ARCA: Older than NASCAR? - 03-23-2006 , 06:44 PM



"Pup" <puppinator7 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in news:1143133848.739852.81240
@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

Quote:
I THOUGHT it might have possibly been IMCA...but I can't find anything
historical at their website to support that either.
"The International Motor Contest Association (IMCA), organized in
1915, is the oldest active automobile racing sanctioning body in
the United States."

From: http://www.imca.com/about.php

(I'd guess the oldest "inactive" is the AAA, who sanctioned
Indy, and most of what's now handled by USAC, up until the
mid 1950's).

John



Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
Carey Akin
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: ARCA: Older than NASCAR? - 03-24-2006 , 08:08 AM




"John McCoy" <igopogo (AT) ix (DOT) netcom.com> wrote

Quote:
"The International Motor Contest Association (IMCA), organized in
1915, is the oldest active automobile racing sanctioning body in
the United States."

From: http://www.imca.com/about.php

(I'd guess the oldest "inactive" is the AAA, who sanctioned
Indy, and most of what's now handled by USAC, up until the
mid 1950's).

Trivia question. Why did AAA pull out of race sanctioning?

Carey in Manvel




Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old   
Bill Jonesi
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: ARCA: Older than NASCAR? - 03-24-2006 , 12:40 PM



Carey Akin wrote:
Quote:
"John McCoy" <igopogo (AT) ix (DOT) netcom.com> wrote in message
news:Xns978FBF972748Apogosupernews (AT) 216 (DOT) 168.3.30...

"The International Motor Contest Association (IMCA), organized in
1915, is the oldest active automobile racing sanctioning body in
the United States."

From: http://www.imca.com/about.php

(I'd guess the oldest "inactive" is the AAA, who sanctioned
Indy, and most of what's now handled by USAC, up until the
mid 1950's).

Trivia question. Why did AAA pull out of race sanctioning?

Carey in Manvel
'55 LeMans tragedy, race car into stands many spectators killed.



Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old   
Carey Akin
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: ARCA: Older than NASCAR? - 03-24-2006 , 12:49 PM




"Bill Jonesi" <jonesi (AT) pcmagic (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
'55 LeMans tragedy, race car into stands many spectators killed.

Correct.

Carey in Manvel




Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old   
John McCoy
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: ARCA: Older than NASCAR? - 03-24-2006 , 07:00 PM



"Carey Akin" <cmakin (AT) att (DOT) net> wrote in news:uiWUf.618328$qk4.509048
@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:

Quote:
"Bill Jonesi" <jonesi (AT) pcmagic (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:44242EF2.43C6 (AT) pcmagic (DOT) net...

'55 LeMans tragedy, race car into stands many spectators killed.

Correct.
True, altho that skips some intermediate steps. When Pierre Levegh
crashed into the spectators, killing 86, there was a huge outcry
against the "barbaric" sport of auto racing. Politicians in
many places, including several US states, talked about outlawing
auto racing, and companies close to the sport quickly moved to
distance themselves from it. The AAA saw that it was unwise
for them to continue to associate themselves with the sporting
side of automobiles, and quietly disposed of their competition
department (who walked down the hall and hung out a sign with
"USAC" on it).

This is worth remembering when people start with the "ditch
the plates, let them race" BS everytime we get to Daytona
and Talladega. Bobby Allison came damn close to repeating
Pierre Levegh's accident, and in today's legal and political
climate, an accident like that could very easily inspire the
same "make racing illegal" reaction that occured in 1955,
only with worse results.

John


Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old   
John McCoy
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: ARCA: Older than NASCAR? - 03-26-2006 , 08:15 PM



"mark" <usenet1958 (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote in news:e43Vf.245$tZ.183@trndny03:

Quote:
It is also worth remembering that back then cars didn't run in packs.
A simular accident today could easily put two or three cars in the
same section of catch fence.
No, because today we have the roof flap. Since the flap is fairly
effective at keeping the cars on the ground, the risk of getting
more than one car into the fence is less now than then.

Quote:
Plates that pack the cars may actually
be worse than the extra speed.
No, definately not. The plate is necessary to make the roof flaps
work (this is something which is apparently totally unknown to
most fans). The flaps have been tested extensively in the wind
tunnel, the last test I know of (which was several years ago)
showed the cars would start lifting, with the flaps deployed, at
204mph. Given the "improvement" in body shape since then, I
imagine the speed at which the flaps fail to work has dropped
by a few mph.

John


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.