![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
So what Johnson's Crew Chief did is bad enough to have him thrown out of Daytona but not bad enough to have the car impounded. This just doesn't make any sense. If Nascar really was interested in stopping the blatant attempts at cheating, the whole team would have been escorted off of the property. This would get the message across to the teams. It's quite obvious that Nascar is more interested in the publicity that this whole thing created than they are in stopping the cheating. You can't fine these teams enough to make them stop and 25 points doesn't make that much difference to them, but if you keep their sponsor off the track and off camera just maybe that would make them stop and think twice before they ever attempted to blatantly cheat like Knaus continues to do. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Chris Warner" <warnercc (AT) mchsi (DOT) com> wrote in message news:kiwKf.568996$084.55358 (AT) attbi_s22 (DOT) .. So what Johnson's Crew Chief did is bad enough to have him thrown out of Daytona but not bad enough to have the car impounded. This just doesn't make any sense. If Nascar really was interested in stopping the blatant attempts at cheating, the whole team would have been escorted off of the property. This would get the message across to the teams. It's quite obvious that Nascar is more interested in the publicity that this whole thing created than they are in stopping the cheating. You can't fine these teams enough to make them stop and 25 points doesn't make that much difference to them, but if you keep their sponsor off the track and off camera just maybe that would make them stop and think twice before they ever attempted to blatantly cheat like Knaus continues to do. NA$CAR will not tell a big time sponsor (like Lowes) to go away -- Benjamin Yazersky CPA [NJ & NY] ---> real address on hobokenx or hobokeni <--- |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
in other words..Nascar has no balls........... |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
So what Johnson's Crew Chief did is bad enough to have him thrown out of Daytona but not bad enough to have the car impounded. This just doesn't make any sense. If Nascar really was interested in stopping the blatant |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Chris Warner wrote: So what Johnson's Crew Chief did is bad enough to have him thrown out of Daytona but not bad enough to have the car impounded. This just doesn't make any sense. If Nascar really was interested in stopping the blatant generally cars are only taken from the teams if the out-of-compliance elements can't be corrected prior to the start of the race. Katharine, who doesn't have her tin foil hat at hand so she can't go off into Conspiracy Land |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
| And isn't this the whole point? To be consistant Nascar needs to start taking cars whether or not the cars can be corrected or not. You would think that Nascar would be more irate because these guys think that they won't be caught by something like this.......or was the illegal part just a smoke screen for something really more illegal? This is the reason that the cars really need to be confiscated regardless if the illegal parts can be removed. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Chris Warner" <warnercc (AT) mchsi (DOT) com> wrote in message news:Y5GKf.781703$x96.242637 (AT) attbi_s72 (DOT) .. And isn't this the whole point? To be consistant Nascar needs to start taking cars whether or not the cars can be corrected or not. You would think that Nascar would be more irate because these guys think that they won't be caught by something like this.......or was the illegal part just a smoke screen for something really more illegal? This is the reason that the cars really need to be confiscated regardless if the illegal parts can be removed. It's an inspection process. For one - if NASCAR is not competent enough to find a "problem" then the car should be legal once it clears the inspection station. Of course that would not work because NASCAR continues to change the rules every week, upon discovering some new innovative approach by a team. It becomes deemed "illegal" and a big huff follows. Spirit of the rules and all that crap. That's just an excuse to continue to subjectively control the events. No surprise - NASCAR has made it clear that they're about the show. You seem offended by what they *think* they can get away with. So what? If they think they can and they're wrong, they pay the price. What does it matter that they think they can beat the system? If they try and they do get away with it so what? Do you really believe stuff isn't happening every day on every team? Stuff that is "illegal". I just don't buy this "confiscate the car" thing. So many people are all about punishment. If the car's illegal, and it gets caught then it can't race until it's legal or they bring up another car that is legal. Why the hang-up on punishment? You're making this too complicated. Legal - run it. Not legal - can't run it. Change it after inspection and it's discovered to be illegal as a result - no points, no place, no cash. Will NASCAR see it this way? Heck no. For a couple of reasons IMHO. For one, they're all about the power of NASCAR and they do resent crews not humbly bowing in deference to NASCAR. For another, they're trying hard to market to a new demographic that they feel is inconsistent with the idea of cheating. They're focused on where they want NASCAR to go and they make the rules, so all the rest is just guys like me bitching. -- -Mike- mmarlowREMOVE (AT) alltel (DOT) netx |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |