AutosTalk Forums  

Bow Tie dominance...

Nascar NASCAR and other professional stock car racing (rec.autos.sport.nascar)


Discuss Bow Tie dominance... in the Nascar forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old   
Mike Marlow
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Bow Tie dominance... - 04-16-2007 , 11:02 PM







"Frank from Deeeetroit" <dadurweird (AT) voyager (DOT) net> wrote


Quote:
On the pre-race show, DW and company talked about when Chevy would
introduce
their new engine, I beleive they said the new engine was not due yet. DW
said that Chevy introduced the new engine at Texas because of dyno
results.
One of the other announcers said talk was the new engines produced about
15
to 20 more hoursepower. I think the estimate of 15 to 20 horses is a bit
much, but the new engine had a pretty good outing.


Depends on how you look at it Frank. Gordon ran the old SB2. If it had not
been for that damned wall (a couple of times...), he'd have taken that old
SB2 right on into Victory Lane. That does not at all say anything powerful
about the new motor.

--

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE (AT) alltel (DOT) net




Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old   
JerseyMike
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Bow Tie dominance... - 04-17-2007 , 06:27 AM







"Daniel" <sabot120mm (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
On Apr 16, 10:17 pm, "JerseyMike" <clamdigger... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:
"Daniel" <sabot12... (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message

news:1176773892.663760.126960 (AT) d57g2000hsg (DOT) googlegroups.com...





On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, "JerseyMike" <clamdigger... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:
"Daniel" <sabot12... (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message

news:1176755348.873974.184060 (AT) y5g2000hsa (DOT) googlegroups.com...

On Apr 16, 3:32 pm, "JerseyMike" <clamdigger... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:
"armpit" <armarmpit... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message

news:ap-dnVYLi7u2ML7bnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d (AT) giganews (DOT) com...

"Mike Marlow" <mmar... (AT) alltel (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:4ef57$4623aab2$4b58a657$31162 (AT) ALLTEL (DOT) NET...

"armpit" <armarmpit... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:2pidnUTDLP7eAr7bnZ2dnUVZ_v-tnZ2d (AT) giganews (DOT) com...

"JerseyMike" <clamdigger... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message

news:PuMUh.49921$VU4.9705 (AT) bgtnsc05-news (DOT) ops.worldnet.att.net...
after yet another dominating performance by the bowtie
brigade...how
much
longer will it take for Na$car to step in like they did
in
the
truck
series
and mandate a change unless the few laps the blue deuce
led
yesterday
counts
as parity.

if it was Toyota teams dominating these races,would it
then
be a
time
for
a
change?

mike.........

All the Chevy fans will tell you its because most of the
top
teams
are
Chevy
teams. That's a fat load of crap. Mark Martin is having a
great
season
running for a *second tier* Chevy team. Probably a better
start
than he
ever
had at Roush. Imagine how big of a point lead Matt Kenseth
would
have
now
if
he were driving a Chevy.

And as if Chevy weren't dominating enough, Nascar lets them
have a
new
engine design on top of it all. Sheesh.

Ok... so what is Chevy's advantage? HP? Nope.

How do you know? Peak HP ain't everything. It's all about the
area
under
the
curve, and NASCAR doesn't release that data when they dyno the
engines.

Aero? Nope.

Again, how do you know? They don't use all the same templates.
The
CoT
will
finally remove that bonus, but until they go to a common
engine,
Chevy
will
always have a gifted advantage. They've had it for years &
years.

so are you a supporter of the COT for the common template?

i support the safety issues they are trying to engage, but not
the
templates.

the only advantage that Chevy has is that they actually try and
manufacter a
car that can be competitive in CUP.

So you can go down to your local Chevy dealership and buy an exact
copy of a Nextel Cup car?

Do the Chevy race teams buy their race cars directly from
Chevrolet?

Wow, that's news. For years we have been told that the teams built
these cars by hand, and that the engines were about the only thing
the
manufacturer had actually manufactured. How did you get the memo
that
everyone else didn't?

Face it, NASCRAP has tilted the field in favor of Chevy, and have
done
so for decades. Hell, they went so far as to make the Dodge teams
re-
engineer their engines to a Chevy type design.

well, the initial street version Monte was designed around the Cup
rules.
that way when the teams go the shop and start adding on, the car
makes a
better race car.

Sure it was. That's why it has RWD and a 5.7 Carbureted, pushrod V-8.
Try again.

the body style was initially designed around the Cup rules.


The Chevrolet Monte Carlo has NOTHING to do with the Cup car, aside
from decals.

there are specific areas of the car that still have to meet stock criteria.
the nose, hood, rear deck, windhield and roof line are just some i can think
of, but when GM brough tthe Monte back its street version was designed to
optimize the rules package in place for the bodies.

if that's been changed it's news to me, but i'll look around for what is
required for the body templates.

mike........




Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old   
43fan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Bow Tie dominance... - 04-17-2007 , 08:03 AM




"Mike Marlow" <mmarlow (AT) alltel (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
"armpit" <armarmpitpit (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news6KdnSY0o9nltLnbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d (AT) giganews (DOT) com...



If Kenseth drove a Chevy, none of the other Chevies would ever win.

Don't lose sight of the basis for comparison. Mark Martin moves from a
top
Ford team to a SECOND TIER CHEVY and consistently finishes towards the
front.

So... back to a question that I recently asked. Ford makes more HP than
Chevy. Aero is equal across all makes. So you tell me - what's the deal
with drivers like Martin? Maybe he didn't have the incentive to push for
Jack? Maybe now, with a new team - not a new manufacturer, he feels
re-invigorated? Let's face it - Martin is a better driver than he has
presented himself to be for over five years now. I still don't believe he
has the fire in his gut to be a champion, but he might just have a new
excitement for the sport. An excitement that is fueled by something
within
the team and not related to manufacturer.


What hope does Ford or Dodge have if their very best teams can barely
compete with the NASCAR/Chevy leftovers?

Well, let's see. What is Yates these days? I think Roush has problems
under the covers that affect how much his drivers/teams really want to
work
for him. Who else is there in the Ford camp? Dodge... geeze, who in the
hell even wants to drive a Dodge? Kurt saw an opportunity to be more
prominent than he was at Roush. Evernaham teams... pray for them. Kasey
is
only good for google eyed girly commercials. I agree - they can't compete
with Chevy's leftovers, but don't look at the manufacturers, look at the
owner/teams.


Nascar's not about parity. Nascar's about Bowties and making sure they
win.
Ever see Nascar throw a debris caution for Matt Kenseth? Mark Martin?
Biffle? Edwards? Any Ford driver? Any Dodge driver? I've seen plenty of
them
thrown for Junior & Gordon. Stewart too. Parity my ass.



Oh, bull. It would simply be too obvious to give anything - anything at
all
to a Ford or Dodge team. I do agree that some driver/teams get favored
treatment, but not based on the bow tie. Those days are gone in my
opinion.
I think Ford paid its penance and I think NASCAR wants Dodge and Toyota to
be successful in order to keep the "excitement" up. Maybe moreso Toyota
these days than Dodge, but I think they want to see the field rounded out
for the entertainment value.

Mike,

While I'll admit I'm pretty biased against Chevy, and that taints my views,
I think you'd have to admit that your feelings toward Chevy taint your views
the other direction. Seriously look at the rules changes over the years
that have been allowed for Chevy vs what's been allowed for other
manufacturers. As far as better teams/drivers, heck, I root for PE, so I
certainly can't say that Hendrick, Childress and Gibbs aren't better teams
than PE is right now. But again I go back to the "favors" that have been
given to Chevy.

One big one is when the new Monte was first introduced. Where did the "beer
can" headlight area come from? Why were they allowed to do it at all?
Because it gave them a distinct aero advantage, that's why. I mean come on,
look at the stock Monte headlights and look at the Cup Monte headlights.
Not even close. At least when the Intrepid was on the track, the nose
pretty much followed the stock shape. Same with the Taurus and now the
Fusion. I will say that Dodge's new Charger nose pulls farther away from
the "stock" appearance than the Intrepid did.

Then look at what Nascar did to Dodge last year. Dodge introduced a new
nose partway through the year the year before. Nascar said NO changes mid
year. Use it next year. They approved it, knowing full well Dodge had done
it's testing based on the current spoiler rules... then as soon as it was
approved, changed the spoiler rules which effectively negated all the work
Dodge had done. Again Dodge was told, NO changes mid year, you submitted a
nose, live with it. But um... Chevy gets to introduce a new motor after the
start of the year??? Nah... no bias toward GM at all, is there? Sheesh...

Quote:
--

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE (AT) alltel (DOT) net





Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old   
armpit
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Bow Tie dominance... - 04-17-2007 , 08:17 AM




"Mike Marlow" <mmarlow (AT) alltel (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
"armpit" <armarmpitpit (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news6KdnSY0o9nltLnbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d (AT) giganews (DOT) com...



If Kenseth drove a Chevy, none of the other Chevies would ever win.

Don't lose sight of the basis for comparison. Mark Martin moves from a
top
Ford team to a SECOND TIER CHEVY and consistently finishes towards the
front.

So... back to a question that I recently asked. Ford makes more HP than
Chevy.
Peak HP maybe. Like I responded to your question, it's all about the area
under the HP curve, and that data isn't made public.

Quote:
Aero is equal across all makes.
Says who? Only the CoT guarantees a level playing field. The current
templates still aren't the same for all manufacturers.

Quote:
So you tell me - what's the deal
with drivers like Martin? Maybe he didn't have the incentive to push for
Jack? Maybe now, with a new team - not a new manufacturer, he feels
re-invigorated? Let's face it - Martin is a better driver than he has
presented himself to be for over five years now. I still don't believe he
has the fire in his gut to be a champion, but he might just have a new
excitement for the sport. An excitement that is fueled by something
within
the team and not related to manufacturer.
Um, yeah. I'm sure the car has nothing to do with it. The reason Martin is
cranking out top 5's with a new team (new to him) right off the bat *must*
be totally due to his attitude.
Quote:

What hope does Ford or Dodge have if their very best teams can barely
compete with the NASCAR/Chevy leftovers?

Well, let's see. What is Yates these days? I think Roush has problems
under the covers that affect how much his drivers/teams really want to
work
for him.
Do tell. What are these problems?

Quote:
Who else is there in the Ford camp? Dodge... geeze, who in the
hell even wants to drive a Dodge? Kurt saw an opportunity to be more
prominent than he was at Roush. Evernaham teams... pray for them. Kasey
is
only good for google eyed girly commercials. I agree - they can't compete
with Chevy's leftovers, but don't look at the manufacturers, look at the
owner/teams.

Why would I look at owners & teams when there is a clear-cut,
across-the-board advantage?

Quote:

Nascar's not about parity. Nascar's about Bowties and making sure they
win.
Ever see Nascar throw a debris caution for Matt Kenseth? Mark Martin?
Biffle? Edwards? Any Ford driver? Any Dodge driver? I've seen plenty of
them
thrown for Junior & Gordon. Stewart too. Parity my ass.



Oh, bull. It would simply be too obvious to give anything - anything at
all
to a Ford or Dodge team. I do agree that some driver/teams get favored
treatment, but not based on the bow tie.
Funny how all those favored drivers just happen to drive Chevies, eh?

Quote:
Those days are gone in my opinion.
I think Ford paid its penance
Paid it's penance? For what?

Quote:
and I think NASCAR wants Dodge and Toyota to
be successful in order to keep the "excitement" up. Maybe moreso Toyota
these days than Dodge, but I think they want to see the field rounded out
for the entertainment value.
That's a nice thought. I'm sure the Chevy fans are entertained.




Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old   
Frank from Deeetroit
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Bow Tie dominance... - 04-17-2007 , 09:33 AM




"Mike Marlow" <mmarlow (AT) alltel (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
"Frank from Deeeetroit" <dadurweird (AT) voyager (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:L-KdncdQ0pFktLnbnZ2dnUVZ_jOdnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com...


On the pre-race show, DW and company talked about when Chevy would
introduce
their new engine, I beleive they said the new engine was not due yet. DW
said that Chevy introduced the new engine at Texas because of dyno
results.
One of the other announcers said talk was the new engines produced about
15
to 20 more hoursepower. I think the estimate of 15 to 20 horses is a bit
much, but the new engine had a pretty good outing.



Depends on how you look at it Frank. Gordon ran the old SB2. If it had
not
been for that damned wall (a couple of times...), he'd have taken that old
SB2 right on into Victory Lane. That does not at all say anything
powerful
about the new motor.

--

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE (AT) alltel (DOT) net


I agree, DW's claim of 15 to 20 horse increase is a huge amount of
horspower. If true, all of the new Chevy engines would have beat out the
rest of the field. At the Cup level, 3 -5 additional horsepower is a large
increase.




Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old   
Mike Marlow
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Bow Tie dominance... - 04-17-2007 , 07:47 PM




"armpit" <armarmpitpit (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
"Mike Marlow" <mmarlow (AT) alltel (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:8a49a$46244730$4b58a657$5444 (AT) ALLTEL (DOT) NET...


So... back to a question that I recently asked. Ford makes more HP than
Chevy.

Peak HP maybe. Like I responded to your question, it's all about the area
under the HP curve, and that data isn't made public.
Sure it's about torque, but if there's any reason to believe that one brand
has the better torque/HP capabiity, I'd say it's Ford. Haven't you noticed
that no one can ever seem to catch Kenseth or Edwards if they get out front?
How about the way they get to the front.

Quote:
Aero is equal across all makes.

Says who? Only the CoT guarantees a level playing field. The current
templates still aren't the same for all manufacturers.
When was the last time you heard a driver complaining about it? If there
were any significant aero differences you can bet you'd be hearing the
drivers complain. When was the last time you saw one brand suffer an aero
disadvantage compared to another?

Quote:
So you tell me - what's the deal
with drivers like Martin? Maybe he didn't have the incentive to push
for
Jack? Maybe now, with a new team - not a new manufacturer, he feels
re-invigorated? Let's face it - Martin is a better driver than he has
presented himself to be for over five years now. I still don't believe
he
has the fire in his gut to be a champion, but he might just have a new
excitement for the sport. An excitement that is fueled by something
within
the team and not related to manufacturer.

Um, yeah. I'm sure the car has nothing to do with it. The reason Martin is
cranking out top 5's with a new team (new to him) right off the bat *must*
be totally due to his attitude.
I think that's the biggest part of it. I can't prove it, but that's what
I'm guessing.

Quote:
Well, let's see. What is Yates these days? I think Roush has problems
under the covers that affect how much his drivers/teams really want to
work
for him.

Do tell. What are these problems?
Don't know - that's why I said "I think". Look at Burton - he seemed to
have come alive after leaving Roush, and not just because he was in a better
car. Remember, it was quite a while before he did anything in that Cingular
Chevy, but his attitude was remarkably different. I think I see the same
thing in Martin. Busch left to go drive a Dodge. He was a Champion with
that Ford team, but he left it all behind. I don't think life is all that
happy at Jack's house.

Quote:
Who else is there in the Ford camp? Dodge... geeze, who in the
hell even wants to drive a Dodge? Kurt saw an opportunity to be more
prominent than he was at Roush. Evernaham teams... pray for them.
Kasey
is
only good for google eyed girly commercials. I agree - they can't
compete
with Chevy's leftovers, but don't look at the manufacturers, look at the
owner/teams.


Why would I look at owners & teams when there is a clear-cut,
across-the-board advantage?

Tell me that again when those Roush Fords are toasting the rest of the
field.



--

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE (AT) alltel (DOT) net




Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old   
Mike Marlow
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Bow Tie dominance... - 04-17-2007 , 07:49 PM




"43fan" <sleap13 (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote


Quote:
Mike,

While I'll admit I'm pretty biased against Chevy, and that taints my
views,
I think you'd have to admit that your feelings toward Chevy taint your
views
the other direction. Seriously look at the rules changes over the years
that have been allowed for Chevy vs what's been allowed for other
manufacturers. As far as better teams/drivers, heck, I root for PE, so I
certainly can't say that Hendrick, Childress and Gibbs aren't better teams
than PE is right now. But again I go back to the "favors" that have been
given to Chevy.

Oh hell - you know I admit to being biased in favor of the GM's. It's part
of what makes me the great guy that I am...

--

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE (AT) alltel (DOT) net




Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old   
43fan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Bow Tie dominance... - 04-18-2007 , 04:57 AM




"Mike Marlow" <mmarlow (AT) alltel (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
"armpit" <armarmpitpit (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:iKydnUsc6u9vVbnbnZ2dnUVZ_hOdnZ2d (AT) giganews (DOT) com...

"Mike Marlow" <mmarlow (AT) alltel (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:8a49a$46244730$4b58a657$5444 (AT) ALLTEL (DOT) NET...


So... back to a question that I recently asked. Ford makes more HP
than
Chevy.

Peak HP maybe. Like I responded to your question, it's all about the area
under the HP curve, and that data isn't made public.

Sure it's about torque, but if there's any reason to believe that one
brand
has the better torque/HP capabiity, I'd say it's Ford. Haven't you
noticed
that no one can ever seem to catch Kenseth or Edwards if they get out
front?
How about the way they get to the front.


Aero is equal across all makes.

Says who? Only the CoT guarantees a level playing field. The current
templates still aren't the same for all manufacturers.

When was the last time you heard a driver complaining about it? If there
were any significant aero differences you can bet you'd be hearing the
drivers complain. When was the last time you saw one brand suffer an aero
disadvantage compared to another?

Um, I need to answer this one. Dodge. They submit a new nose, then
Nascar changes the rules making everything they tested and worked out,
basically obsolete. This was last year. New nose again this year to
compensate for the spoiler change, then Nascar ups the number of COT races
by a lot, making the Dodge teams basically "develop" two cars if they want
to even stand a chance at making the Chase.

Quote:
So you tell me - what's the deal
with drivers like Martin? Maybe he didn't have the incentive to push
for
Jack? Maybe now, with a new team - not a new manufacturer, he feels
re-invigorated? Let's face it - Martin is a better driver than he has
presented himself to be for over five years now. I still don't believe
he
has the fire in his gut to be a champion, but he might just have a new
excitement for the sport. An excitement that is fueled by something
within
the team and not related to manufacturer.

Um, yeah. I'm sure the car has nothing to do with it. The reason Martin
is
cranking out top 5's with a new team (new to him) right off the bat
*must*
be totally due to his attitude.

I think that's the biggest part of it. I can't prove it, but that's what
I'm guessing.


Well, let's see. What is Yates these days? I think Roush has problems
under the covers that affect how much his drivers/teams really want to
work
for him.

Do tell. What are these problems?

Don't know - that's why I said "I think". Look at Burton - he seemed to
have come alive after leaving Roush, and not just because he was in a
better
car. Remember, it was quite a while before he did anything in that
Cingular
Chevy, but his attitude was remarkably different. I think I see the same
thing in Martin. Busch left to go drive a Dodge. He was a Champion with
that Ford team, but he left it all behind. I don't think life is all that
happy at Jack's house.


Who else is there in the Ford camp? Dodge... geeze, who in the
hell even wants to drive a Dodge? Kurt saw an opportunity to be more
prominent than he was at Roush. Evernaham teams... pray for them.
Kasey
is
only good for google eyed girly commercials. I agree - they can't
compete
with Chevy's leftovers, but don't look at the manufacturers, look at
the
owner/teams.


Why would I look at owners & teams when there is a clear-cut,
across-the-board advantage?


Tell me that again when those Roush Fords are toasting the rest of the
field.



--

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE (AT) alltel (DOT) net





Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old   
Mike Marlow
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Bow Tie dominance... - 04-18-2007 , 06:28 AM




"43fan" <sleap13 (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
"Mike Marlow" <mmarlow (AT) alltel (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:72308$46256b5d$4b58a657$7818 (AT) ALLTEL (DOT) NET...


When was the last time you heard a driver complaining about it? If
there
were any significant aero differences you can bet you'd be hearing the
drivers complain. When was the last time you saw one brand suffer an
aero
disadvantage compared to another?


Um, I need to answer this one. Dodge. They submit a new nose, then
Nascar changes the rules making everything they tested and worked out,
basically obsolete. This was last year. New nose again this year to
compensate for the spoiler change, then Nascar ups the number of COT races
by a lot, making the Dodge teams basically "develop" two cars if they want
to even stand a chance at making the Chase.

Yeah, but everyone has to keep two cars going. Dodge isn't unique in that.
The Dodge nose fiasco was as much Dodge's doing as it was anything NASCAR
subjected them to. But still - my point was that you don't hear Dodge teams
crying that they suffer an aero disadvantage. You'd hear that if they
really did. My point was that the cars today are pretty much aero equal.

--

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE (AT) alltel (DOT) net




Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old   
43fan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Bow Tie dominance... - 04-18-2007 , 07:27 AM




"Mike Marlow" <mmarlow (AT) alltel (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
"43fan" <sleap13 (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:WYednRFOaacYdrjbnZ2dnUVZ_h-vnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com...

"Mike Marlow" <mmarlow (AT) alltel (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:72308$46256b5d$4b58a657$7818 (AT) ALLTEL (DOT) NET...


When was the last time you heard a driver complaining about it? If
there
were any significant aero differences you can bet you'd be hearing the
drivers complain. When was the last time you saw one brand suffer an
aero
disadvantage compared to another?


Um, I need to answer this one. Dodge. They submit a new nose, then
Nascar changes the rules making everything they tested and worked out,
basically obsolete. This was last year. New nose again this year to
compensate for the spoiler change, then Nascar ups the number of COT
races
by a lot, making the Dodge teams basically "develop" two cars if they
want
to even stand a chance at making the Chase.


Yeah, but everyone has to keep two cars going. Dodge isn't unique in
that.
Yes, they are. Everyone has to keep two cars going yes, but the Dodge teams
have basically two "new" cars to deal with. Chevy has one, the COT.

Quote:
The Dodge nose fiasco was as much Dodge's doing as it was anything NASCAR
subjected them to.
Are you referring to last year's car? If so, how was it Dodge's fault?
They tested and wanted to introduce the new nose in the middle of '05,
Nascar told them no, had to wait til '06. Then after it's approved, Nascar
changes the spoiler rules which negated virtually everything Dodge had done
with the new nose. The biggest problem with the Dodge's in '05 and '06 was
balance. The new nose, with the old spoiler rules, balanced the car out.
When Nascar changed the spoiler, the balance was gone again. Then Nascar
refused to allow Dodge a change in '06, after they themselves(Nascar) caused
the problem!

Quote:
But still - my point was that you don't hear Dodge teams
crying that they suffer an aero disadvantage. You'd hear that if they
really did. My point was that the cars today are pretty much aero equal.
They don't? Um... every single Dodge team complained about the nose and the
balance of the car for virtually the past two seasons. Maybe you don't read
the after race reports by the drivers, CC's and owners of the Dodges, but I
do.

Quote:
--

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE (AT) alltel (DOT) net





Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.