![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Jessie" <jlettich (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1104944203.906270.217840 (AT) c13g2000cwb (DOT) googlegroups.com... Dave Balcom wrote: On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:04:05 -0500, "Somebody" somebody (AT) nospam (DOT) russdoucet.com> wrote: }Not sure how authentic/reliable those are If those pics are authentic, it does look like the new Chargers have a flatter nose than the Intrepids... Thanks for sharing! Dave I saw some pictures of the street version and they were dog ugly. Looks much better as a stock car. - Jess I'd hardly call this ugly: http://www.dodgeboy.net/news/charger/index.htm But, the Charger name should've been used on something better IMO. The prototype in what, '99? was a LOT better. It had 4drs too, but at least they were hidden better. Like I said, I don't think this car is "ugly"... it's not as sporty as the name suggests it should be. For some reason, it makes me think of the Aston Martin that Bond used to drive... |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Jessie" Well, when you're dream car is a 68 Charger, this is a let down. I guess I am biased. But I still think it's ugly. Under any model name, it still would not appeal to me. Mine's the '69... like the '68 too, but not the '70(don't care for the grille). I own a '69. That's why I said that it's somewhat of a disappointment that they used the Charger name on this particular car. |
|
Although, it's much better than when they used it in the 80's on that Omni... |
|
I'm withholding full judgement until I see an actual car. And of course opinions differ. To me the car's not ugly, but from what I've seen so far, it's not deserving of the Charger name either. Of course, when they drop the 6.1L Hemi backed by the 6speed in it... I might change my opinion.... ![]() Move |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
Move Over Professionals Are Racing Mostly |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
"43fan" <sleap (AT) pennswoods (DOT) net> wrote in news:3461p6F46vvgsU1 (AT) individual (DOT) net: "Jessie" <jlettich (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1104944203.906270.217840 (AT) c13g2000cwb (DOT) googlegroups.com... Dave Balcom wrote: On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:04:05 -0500, "Somebody" somebody (AT) nospam (DOT) russdoucet.com> wrote: }Not sure how authentic/reliable those are If those pics are authentic, it does look like the new Chargers have a flatter nose than the Intrepids... Thanks for sharing! Dave I saw some pictures of the street version and they were dog ugly. Looks much better as a stock car. - Jess I'd hardly call this ugly: http://www.dodgeboy.net/news/charger/index.htm But, the Charger name should've been used on something better IMO. The prototype in what, '99? was a LOT better. It had 4drs too, but at least they were hidden better. Like I said, I don't think this car is "ugly"... it's not as sporty as the name suggests it should be. For some reason, it makes me think of the Aston Martin that Bond used to drive... The Alltel racecar looks ugly. It must be the white color with the body style. The red and orange colors look good. It looks like a Ford or Chevy too. Clone cars suck. |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Jessie" <jlettich (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1104944203.906270.217840 (AT) c13g2000cwb (DOT) googlegroups.com... Dave Balcom wrote: On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:04:05 -0500, "Somebody" somebody (AT) nospam (DOT) russdoucet.com> wrote: }Not sure how authentic/reliable those are If those pics are authentic, it does look like the new Chargers have a flatter nose than the Intrepids... Thanks for sharing! Dave I saw some pictures of the street version and they were dog ugly. Looks much better as a stock car. - Jess I'd hardly call this ugly: http://www.dodgeboy.net/news/charger/index.htm |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |