![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I did a bit of research and there were only 2 cautions last night. The first caution was for debris and no further explanation was given or shown. The final caution was another "debris" issue. The caution lasted 7 laps with one "wave off". I dont believe there was any explanation as to why it took so long to remove debris other than it was an attempt to set up a wild finish or as some might say the whole thing was staged? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
The final caution was another "debris" issue. The caution lasted 7 laps with one "wave off". I dont believe there was any explanation as to why it took so long to remove debris other than it was an attempt to set up a wild finish or as some might say the whole thing was staged? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Texan in Belgium <joedopebucket (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in news:c37cdfcf-eb85- 466a-8f0d-64d848a54c97 (AT) b14g2000...oglegroups.com: The final caution was another "debris" issue. The caution lasted 7 laps with one "wave off". I dont believe there was any explanation as to why it took so long to remove debris other than it was an attempt to set up a wild finish or as some might say the whole thing was staged? There were two wave offs. The first was because 2 cars (Steven Wallace and one other, the #15 I think) were not in their right places in the double file. There was no explanation for the second wave off. John |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
I did a bit of research and there were only 2 cautions last night. The first caution was for debris and no further explanation was given or shown. The final caution was another "debris" issue. The caution lasted 7 laps with one "wave off". I dont believe there was any explanation as to why it took so long to remove debris other than it was an attempt to set up a wild finish or as some might say the whole thing was staged? |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Jul 11, 9:37*am, Texan in Belgium <joedopebuc... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: I did a bit of research and there were only 2 cautions last night. The first caution was for debris and no further explanation was given or shown. The final caution was another "debris" issue. The caution lasted 7 laps with one "wave off". I dont believe there was any explanation as to why it took so long to remove debris other than it was an attempt to set up a wild finish or as some might say the whole thing was staged? |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
TNT has not been showing any "debris," but Fox shows debris every time there's a debris caution. I don't know what ABC/ESPN will do. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Victory Lane on Speed showed the debris from the first debris caution. Looked like a wedge rubber. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
brushfire <brush.fire (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote in news:kven5598rp7ijb6s850u6240k1ip12ekrn (AT) 4ax (DOT) com: Victory Lane on Speed showed the debris from the first debris caution. Looked like a wedge rubber. Spring rubber, you mean. A totally harmless thing (it's rubber, after all), but if NASCAR wants a caution to "improve the show"... John |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
My understanding is that these are hard rubber. So I guess its OK if they just leave these on the track? Maybe somebody hits it and pops it up? Or punts it? Into the stands how fast? Through the windshield of a car? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |