Gordon officially a better driver than Earnhardt

#21

Vandar wrote:

Quote:

Cessna 310 wrote:

Vandar wrote:

Cessna 310 wrote:

Ron wrote:

On Apr 29, 5:51 pm, Cessna 310 <jolene... (AT) sbc (DOT) com> wrote:

Ron wrote:

On Apr 29, 5:44 pm, LaineClos... (AT) msn (DOT) com wrote:

He won more races than Earnhardt in a lot less time. Way to go
paintboy!

As less championships in more yrs....LOL

But JG did it at a lot younger age. JG is better and will leave
DE in
the shadows regardless of the bitching of the dim-witted DE fans.

JG did what at a much younger age? Win more championships?

JG is a deal breaking punk, that didn't stand by a handshake deal with
Bill Davis.

Bitch, whine, moan and complain.... Who won more races? Did DE win
more races? No. Too bad.

So you think Bobby Allison was a better driver than Gordon?

Time will tell.

According to you, since Bobby Allison has more wins than Gordon, he is a
better driver than Gordon, period.

So far, yes. But Bobby isn't competing anymore. JG is.

Quote:

If Gordon ever surpasses Allison in wins, then according to your
criteria, Gordon will have become a better driver than Allison that week.

No. If JG surpasses BA's wins, then JG is the better driver. Not just
for a week, but forward from that point in time.

Quote:

Wins don't mean a thing concerning who's a better driver.

Really? Ya think its something else?

#22

Jeff screwed over Bil Davis AND Ford, who had backed him in Busch.

"a walking contradiction, partly truth and partly fiction"

#23

Knock DW all you want, but in his time, he was hell on wheels at
NASCAR's short tracks.

"a walking contradiction, partly truth and partly fiction"

#24

"Cessna 310" <jolene310 (AT) sbc (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

armpit wrote:
"win-77" <77-wins (AT) and (DOT) pulling.away.com> wrote in message
news:jJcZh.9956$3P3.7638 (AT) newsread3 (DOT) news.pas.earthlink.net...
"noone" <noone (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:noone-7CF674.22385129042007 (AT) free (DOT) teranews.com...
In article <NfcZh.7639$ya1.5348 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny>,
Vandar <vandar69 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

So you think Bobby Allison was a better driver than Gordon?
Of course.

...and FAR, FAR better than "Jaws".

He can't be, according to the trolling fools, Cal/Cessna/invisibrarian
and
noone.

At this point BA is better than Gordon. BA even qualified at Indy when it
meant something. And Gordon has some distance to cover before he proves
himself better than Allison.

But you feel because I think Gordon is better than DE, and don't agree
with you, that I must be some kind of troll. Not at all. Just putting
rationality and logic into the discussion.

You made your point last week. Now you're just taunting DE fans by spouting
the same rhetoric in addition to making insults. That's trolling, pure &
simple.

As far as rationality & logic, you're basing your opinion on one single
statistic, career wins. How logical is it to come to a conclusion from a
single sample of data?

#25

armpit wrote:

Quote:

"Cessna 310" <jolene310 (AT) sbc (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:eKdZh.2123$dU3.1880 (AT) newsfe04 (DOT) lga...
armpit wrote:
"win-77" <77-wins (AT) and (DOT) pulling.away.com> wrote in message
news:jJcZh.9956$3P3.7638 (AT) newsread3 (DOT) news.pas.earthlink.net...
"noone" <noone (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:noone-7CF674.22385129042007 (AT) free (DOT) teranews.com...
In article <NfcZh.7639$ya1.5348 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny>,
Vandar <vandar69 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

So you think Bobby Allison was a better driver than Gordon?
Of course.

...and FAR, FAR better than "Jaws".

He can't be, according to the trolling fools, Cal/Cessna/invisibrarian
and
noone.
At this point BA is better than Gordon. BA even qualified at Indy when it
meant something. And Gordon has some distance to cover before he proves
himself better than Allison.

But you feel because I think Gordon is better than DE, and don't agree
with you, that I must be some kind of troll. Not at all. Just putting
rationality and logic into the discussion.

You made your point last week. Now you're just taunting DE fans by spouting
the same rhetoric in addition to making insults. That's trolling, pure &
simple.

As far as rationality & logic, you're basing your opinion on one single
statistic, career wins. How logical is it to come to a conclusion from a
single sample of data?

Seems like 310 isn't ranting as much as you are. Besides, winning is
what counts and Gordon has more than DE.

#26

Cessna 310 wrote:

Quote:

Vandar wrote:

Cessna 310 wrote:

Vandar wrote:

Cessna 310 wrote:

Ron wrote:

On Apr 29, 5:51 pm, Cessna 310 <jolene... (AT) sbc (DOT) com> wrote:

Ron wrote:

On Apr 29, 5:44 pm, LaineClos... (AT) msn (DOT) com wrote:

He won more races than Earnhardt in a lot less time. Way to go
paintboy!

As less championships in more yrs....LOL

But JG did it at a lot younger age. JG is better and will leave
DE in
the shadows regardless of the bitching of the dim-witted DE fans.

JG did what at a much younger age? Win more championships?

JG is a deal breaking punk, that didn't stand by a handshake deal
with
Bill Davis.

Bitch, whine, moan and complain.... Who won more races? Did DE
win more races? No. Too bad.

So you think Bobby Allison was a better driver than Gordon?

Time will tell.

According to you, since Bobby Allison has more wins than Gordon, he is
a better driver than Gordon, period.

So far, yes. But Bobby isn't competing anymore. JG is.

If Gordon ever surpasses Allison in wins, then according to your
criteria, Gordon will have become a better driver than Allison that week.

No. If JG surpasses BA's wins, then JG is the better driver. Not just
for a week, but forward from that point in time.

Which exposes a serious flaw in your logic.

If Gordon is sitting at 84 wins on a Saturday, then your criteria says
he is not as good as Bobby Allison. If he wins the next day, then your
criteria says he all of a sudden became better than Allison in a 24 hour
period.

He's either better than Allison right now or not, and that answer isn't
going to change based on number of wins.

Quote:

Wins don't mean a thing concerning who's a better driver.

Really? Ya think its something else?

To determine who's a better driver? Yes.

#27

"linux57" <linux570 (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:

armpit wrote:
"Cessna 310" <jolene310 (AT) sbc (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:eKdZh.2123$dU3.1880 (AT) newsfe04 (DOT) lga...
armpit wrote:
"win-77" <77-wins (AT) and (DOT) pulling.away.com> wrote in message
news:jJcZh.9956$3P3.7638 (AT) newsread3 (DOT) news.pas.earthlink.net...
"noone" <noone (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:noone-7CF674.22385129042007 (AT) free (DOT) teranews.com...
In article <NfcZh.7639$ya1.5348 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny>,
Vandar <vandar69 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

So you think Bobby Allison was a better driver than Gordon?
Of course.

...and FAR, FAR better than "Jaws".

He can't be, according to the trolling fools, Cal/Cessna/invisibrarian
and
noone.
At this point BA is better than Gordon. BA even qualified at Indy when
it meant something. And Gordon has some distance to cover before he
proves himself better than Allison.

But you feel because I think Gordon is better than DE, and don't agree
with you, that I must be some kind of troll. Not at all. Just putting
rationality and logic into the discussion.

You made your point last week. Now you're just taunting DE fans by
spouting the same rhetoric in addition to making insults. That's
trolling, pure & simple.

As far as rationality & logic, you're basing your opinion on one single
statistic, career wins. How logical is it to come to a conclusion from a
single sample of data?

Seems like 310 isn't ranting as much as you are. Besides, winning is what
counts and Gordon has more than DE.

Since yesterday he's outposted me about 3:1 Maybe it seems like I've posted
more because he has nothing new to say.

And I agree that winning is what counts, but DE is the one with more. He's
been dead for 6 years and he's still ahead 7-4

#28

noone wrote:

Quote:

In article <2685-463594F5-906 (AT) storefull-3334 (DOT) bay.webtv.net>,
FS351 (AT) webtv (DOT) net (F S) wrote:

Jeff screwed over Bil Davis AND Ford, who had backed him in Busch.

Jeff screwed over Earnhardt by punking Earnhardt into history.

No. Jeff just pushed past DE. He didn't erase his accomplishments.

#29

"Cessna 310" <jolene310 (AT) sbc (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

noone wrote:
In article <2685-463594F5-906 (AT) storefull-3334 (DOT) bay.webtv.net>,
FS351 (AT) webtv (DOT) net (F S) wrote:

Jeff screwed over Bil Davis AND Ford, who had backed him in Busch.

Jeff screwed over Earnhardt by punking Earnhardt into history.

No. Jeff just pushed past DE. He didn't erase his accomplishments.

I guess thats easy to do when your competing against the record of a dead
person...

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Gordon officially a better driver than Earnhardt

Nascar NASCAR and other professional stock car racing (rec.autos.sport.nascar)

Re: Gordon officially a better driver than Earnhardt - 04-30-2007 , 01:09 AM

Re: Gordon officially a better driver than Earnhardt - 04-30-2007 , 02:04 AM

Re: Gordon officially a better driver than Earnhardt - 04-30-2007 , 02:06 AM

Re: Gordon officially a better driver than Earnhardt - 04-30-2007 , 05:36 AM

Re: Gordon officially a better driver than Earnhardt - 04-30-2007 , 08:28 AM

Re: Gordon officially a better driver than Earnhardt - 04-30-2007 , 09:22 AM

Re: Gordon officially a better driver than Earnhardt - 04-30-2007 , 10:47 AM

Re: Gordon officially a better driver than Earnhardt - 04-30-2007 , 08:44 PM

Re: Gordon officially a better driver than Earnhardt - 05-02-2007 , 03:57 PM