With Harvick Gone, Childress Needs to Run The #3

#21

Harry Brogan <hbrogan57 (AT) NOSPAM (DOT) YAHOO.COM> wrote in
news:1t1u551dght0d38vomd26kivkhb3m4vh79 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com:

Quote:

On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:31:34 -0500, Invisibrarian <no.spam (AT) mail (DOT) com
wrote:

nobody wrote:
Why has NASCAR let Childress keep the #3 off track for so long?

Two questions....

Why must they run the #3.

Why not run the #3?

It's much like other sports that retire a number. How about Lou
Gehrig??? I doubt that the PLAYERS would be willing to bring that
number back. Same thing here....do you actually think that there are
any drivers out there that are going to be WILLING to drive the Black
Number Three????

Teams retire numbers, not sports.

#22

"Riley 77" <riley (AT) noemail (DOT) com> wrote in
news:UKJ7m.1502$N5.1299 (AT) nwrddc01 (DOT) gnilink.net:

Quote:

"Chuck Steak" <Chuck_Steak (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:bxF7m.1470$N5.1062 (AT) nwrddc01 (DOT) gnilink.net...
In article nobody <nobody (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote:

Why has NASCAR let Childress keep the #3 off track for so long?

Why do you think NASCAR has anything to do with there being
no #3 out there??

----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------- Dan

No matter how much you push the envelope,
it'll still be stationery

Because Nascar has final say on who gets what number

BTW, has anyone asked Junior Johnson? It was his number as a driver.
I think he was around
long before Dale.

And was a lot better.

#23

In article <nobody (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:

"Riley 77" <riley (AT) noemail (DOT) com> wrote in

BTW, has anyone asked Junior Johnson? It was his number as a driver.
long before Dale.

And was a lot better.

-Roland Martin

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan

No matter how much you push the envelope,
it'll still be stationery

#24

"Vandar" <vandar69 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

Harry Brogan wrote:

On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:31:34 -0500, Invisibrarian <no.spam (AT) mail (DOT) com
wrote:

nobody wrote:

Why has NASCAR let Childress keep the #3 off track for so long?

Two questions....

Why must they run the #3.

Why not run the #3?

It's much like other sports that retire a number. How about Lou
Gehrig??? I doubt that the PLAYERS would be willing to bring that
number back. Same thing here....do you actually think that there are
any drivers out there that are going to be WILLING to drive the Black
Number Three????

The RCR black GM Goodwrench #3 was driven at the Goodwood Festival last
week. The driver was Taylor Earnhardt.

a little vid of it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw_iPtG3IpU

#25

"nobody" <nobody (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

Why has NASCAR let Childress keep the #3 off track for so long?

There used to be a #3 car in NASCAR?

#26

On Jul 17, 2:09*am, "Chad" <cbs... (AT) safemail (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:

"Vandar" <vanda... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message

news:h3o06j$o28$1 (AT) news (DOT) albasani.net...

Harry Brogan wrote:

On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:31:34 -0500, Invisibrarian <no.s... (AT) mail (DOT) com
wrote:

nobody wrote:

Why has NASCAR let Childress keep the #3 off track for so long?

Two questions....

Why must they run the #3.

Why not run the #3?

It's much like other sports that retire a number. *How about Lou
Gehrig??? * I doubt that the PLAYERS would be willing to bring that
number back. *Same thing here....do you actually think that there are
any drivers out there that are going to be WILLING to drive the Black
Number Three????

The RCR black GM Goodwrench #3 was driven at the Goodwood Festival last
week. The driver was Taylor Earnhardt.

a little vid of it here:
*http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw_iPtG3IpU

i didn't know all those drivers went over to england for this...i knew
of taylor earnhardt being there but not rusty, landon and mike

#27

"Harry Brogan" <hbrogan57 (AT) NOSPAM (DOT) YAHOO.COM> wrote

Quote:

On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:31:34 -0500, Invisibrarian <no.spam (AT) mail (DOT) com
wrote:

nobody wrote:
Why has NASCAR let Childress keep the #3 off track for so long?

Two questions....

Why must they run the #3.

Why not run the #3?

It's much like other sports that retire a number. How about Lou
Gehrig??? I doubt that the PLAYERS would be willing to bring that
number back. Same thing here....do you actually think that there are
any drivers out there that are going to be WILLING to drive the Black
Number Three????

who said the number 3 car had to be black?

#28

Joey Tribiani wrote:

Quote:

"Harry Brogan" <hbrogan57 (AT) NOSPAM (DOT) YAHOO.COM> wrote in message
news:1t1u551dght0d38vomd26kivkhb3m4vh79 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:31:34 -0500, Invisibrarian <no.spam (AT) mail (DOT) com
wrote:

nobody wrote:
Why has NASCAR let Childress keep the #3 off track for so long?
Two questions....

Why must they run the #3.

Why not run the #3?

It's much like other sports that retire a number. How about Lou
Gehrig??? I doubt that the PLAYERS would be willing to bring that
number back. Same thing here....do you actually think that there are
any drivers out there that are going to be WILLING to drive the Black
Number Three????

who said the number 3 car had to be black?

Pink with white polka dots would be cool.

#29

On Jul 15, 10:30�pm, "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-oh... (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:

"TS02_05champ" <tonystewart02_05ch... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message

news:4a5ea185$0$5097$9a6e19ea (AT) unlimited (DOT) newshosting.com...

nobody wrote:
Why has NASCAR let Childress keep the #3 off track for so long?

Why does RC *need* to run the #3?

WHY?! �WHY?!

cuz of saint dale the patron saint of dirty drivers.

Only a pathetic weasel would post the above.