![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Why has NASCAR let Childress keep the #3 off track for so long? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
nobody wrote: Why has NASCAR let Childress keep the #3 off track for so long? Why does RC *need* to run the #3? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Why has NASCAR let Childress keep the #3 off track for so long? |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
"TS02_05champ" <tonystewart02_05champ (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message news:4a5ea185$0$5097$9a6e19ea (AT) unlimited (DOT) newshosting.com... nobody wrote: Why has NASCAR let Childress keep the #3 off track for so long? Why does RC *need* to run the #3? WHY?! WHY?! cuz of saint dale the patron saint of dirty drivers. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Ray O'Hara wrote: "TS02_05champ" <tonystewart02_05champ (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message news:4a5ea185$0$5097$9a6e19ea (AT) unlimited (DOT) newshosting.com... nobody wrote: Why has NASCAR let Childress keep the #3 off track for so long? Why does RC *need* to run the #3? WHY?! WHY?! cuz of saint dale the patron saint of dirty drivers. The best NASCAR driver ever...cry me a fucking river. BTW, if you just have to respond to OT crossposted *shit* to this group, would you mind removing RASN from the header. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
nobody wrote: Why has NASCAR let Childress keep the #3 off track for so long? Why does RC *need* to run the #3? |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
nobody wrote: Why has NASCAR let Childress keep the #3 off track for so long? Two questions.... Why must they run the #3. Why not run the #3? |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:31:34 -0500, Invisibrarian <no.spam (AT) mail (DOT) com wrote: nobody wrote: Why has NASCAR let Childress keep the #3 off track for so long? Two questions.... Why must they run the #3. Why not run the #3? It's much like other sports that retire a number. How about Lou Gehrig??? I doubt that the PLAYERS would be willing to bring that number back. Same thing here....do you actually think that there are any drivers out there that are going to be WILLING to drive the Black Number Three???? |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Harry Brogan" <hbrogan57 (AT) NOSPAM (DOT) YAHOO.COM> wrote in message news:1t1u551dght0d38vomd26kivkhb3m4vh79 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:31:34 -0500, Invisibrarian <no.spam (AT) mail (DOT) com wrote: nobody wrote: Why has NASCAR let Childress keep the #3 off track for so long? Two questions.... Why must they run the #3. Why not run the #3? It's much like other sports that retire a number. How about Lou Gehrig??? I doubt that the PLAYERS would be willing to bring that number back. Same thing here....do you actually think that there are any drivers out there that are going to be WILLING to drive the Black Number Three???? I bet there are hundreds of drivers that would drive it if it meant getting a shot at driving a Cup car. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |