AutosTalk Forums  

How could NASCAR boost credibility?

Nascar NASCAR and other professional stock car racing (rec.autos.sport.nascar)


Discuss How could NASCAR boost credibility? in the Nascar forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
Red Baron
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: How could NASCAR boost credibility? - 05-06-2007 , 11:15 AM






Very good conversation starter. Really good ideas to discuss. My comments
below including an idea for Green/Yellow starts.

"Wayne Mann" <tpdl (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
Inside Motorsports: How could NASCAR boost credibility?
By DAVID POOLE, dpoole (AT) charlotteobserver (DOT) com

Five things NASCAR could do to improve its credibility with fans:

1. POST RULES ONLINE: Publish the Nextel Cup, Busch and Truck series
rule books online and allow fans to order copies. The rules for other
major sports are readily available. NASCAR should be no different.
This one is so obvious that it defies logic that it is not already done.

Quote:
2. PAINT LINES ON TRACKS: The lines should show where the electronic
scoring loops are. That way, fans could look at replays and judge
where cars are when a caution comes out, helping them understand
scoring decisions.
Good idea in principle. Full lines across the track are not necessary
though. Little small "hash marks" along the outside wall would suffice.

Quote:
3. TELEMETRY ON TV: Allow television to show telemetry on cars on pit
road. So long as NASCAR is fairly and properly using electronic timing
to call pit-road speeding penalties, this would provide exoneration
the skeptics couldn't deny.
Actually this one has some potential problems. Unless the datastream is from
the same source slight differences or glitches can indicate NASCAR is NOT
"fairly and properly using electronic timing" when they actually are. If the
datastream was the SAME datastream source for both TV and NASCAR officials
it would be good. IOW let TV access NASCARs datastream.

Quote:
4. REALIGN CARS: Wave around cars trapped on the end of the lead lap
because of pit stop timing to let them line up behind the field, not
between the pace car and the leader. A car is either a lap down or
isn't. Other circuits have eliminated this limbo. NASCAR should, too.
Really dumb idea. In essence you are saying that we should just let any cars
a lap down pass the pace car anytime the leader pits after the yellow comes
out. This is not proper and represents an artificial scenario to placate
fans that can't figure it out. The funny thing is that the "Lucky Dog" is
just such a STOOPID idea as well. IF you are a lap down then you STAY a lap
down. PERIOD.

Quote:
5. DEVELOP A THICK SKIN Sometimes, even the best umpires and referees
miss calls. NASCAR is too scared it's going to get caught being wrong
on enforcing a rule. It absolutely happens, and pretending it doesn't
only adds to fans' suspicions.
Sure. But not really important to me.

Quote:
[I add: Never use Green / Yellow starts for races! In fact, I
would like to have yellow laps NOT count! Only count Green Flag
laps!]
Yellow laps that happen AFTER a clean Green start SHOULD always count!

Let's look at the Green/Yellow start.
Why it is done?
Why it is Stupid?
What could be done instead?

Why it is done?
To help dry the track and to get some race laps in where time curfew and/or
weather window issues are tight.

Why it is Stupid?
Because a race is supposed to be a race. Not a parade. Cautions WILL happen
during a race but to start a race under caution is not a race at all.

What could be done instead?
This would help dry the track but not help the other.

Ask the teams to go out at Pace Car Speed behind the pace cars and run 15-20
pace laps. THEN when the track is OK or very nearly OK allow ALL teams a 5
minute pit stop where they can do ANY thing to the car that would be
allowed. Top off fuel and Change tires primarily. If it was an impound race
they would be more restricted than a non-impound race but the same process
would apply.

D





Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
Thoth
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: How could NASCAR boost credibility? - 05-06-2007 , 12:00 PM






On Sat, 5 May 2007 21:36:03 -0400, "The Other Doug"

Quote:
No one want's to see stock bodied cars. They want cars that look like they
belong on a race track....with logos that look like the ones on their cars.

I also disagree with your disagreement on cautions. I believe that the pits
should be effectively closed when the yellow is out forcing green flag pit
stops and/or penalties of going a lap down for entering the pits under
caution. this would make the pit work even more meaningful and pit road
would be less congested.
Pit work is already more meaningful than it should be.
People come to see racing, not tire changing.

--
"To summarize, we conclude that the Second Amendment protects an
individual right to keep and bear arms."
- US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
04-7041 Parker v. District of Columbia


Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old   
Daniel
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: How could NASCAR boost credibility? - 05-06-2007 , 01:25 PM



On May 5, 9:11 pm, Wayne Mann <t... (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote:
Quote:
Inside Motorsports: How could NASCAR boost credibility?
By DAVID POOLE, dpo... (AT) charlotteobserver (DOT) com

Five things NASCAR could do to improve its credibility with fans:

1. POST RULES ONLINE: Publish the Nextel Cup, Busch and Truck series
rule books online and allow fans to order copies. The rules for other
major sports are readily available. NASCAR should be no different.
NASCRAP will never do that.

Quote:
2. PAINT LINES ON TRACKS: The lines should show where the electronic
scoring loops are. That way, fans could look at replays and judge
where cars are when a caution comes out, helping them understand
scoring decisions.
NASCRAP will never do that.

Quote:
3. TELEMETRY ON TV: Allow television to show telemetry on cars on pit
road. So long as NASCAR is fairly and properly using electronic timing
to call pit-road speeding penalties, this would provide exoneration
the skeptics couldn't deny.
NASCRAP will never do that.

Quote:
4. REALIGN CARS: Wave around cars trapped on the end of the lead lap
because of pit stop timing to let them line up behind the field, not
between the pace car and the leader. A car is either a lap down or
isn't. Other circuits have eliminated this limbo. NASCAR should, too.
Agreed, what defines "tail end of the lead lap", and why must they
make up 3/4 of the track or more just to mass the next car in line?

Quote:
5. DEVELOP A THICK SKIN Sometimes, even the best umpires and referees
miss calls. NASCAR is too scared it's going to get caught being wrong
on enforcing a rule. It absolutely happens, and pretending it doesn't
only adds to fans' suspicions.
NASCRAP will never do that.

Quote:
[I add: Never use Green / Yellow starts for races! In fact, I
would like to have yellow laps NOT count! Only count Green Flag
laps!]

Agreed.

6. Run STOCK BODIED cars straight off the assembly line. Go back to
the 5 and 5 rule. If a maunfacturer designs a dog, so be it.

7. Eliminate the top 35. Why should a faster driver go home just
because of his points position? Fastest 43 make the field.

8. Eliminate the 5 points for leading ONE lap.

9. More road courses. Any retard can drive around in a circle. Want
proof? Look no further than the number of teams that have to bring in
wringers for the road races.

10. Eliminate the chase. 100 points for a win, 42 for 2nd, and so on
down to 43rd.

11. If your car goes to the garage, put it on the truck. That will
keep the moving chicanes off the track.

12. Do away with restrictor plates. These guys are supposed to be "the
best in the business", so they should know what a brake pedal is.







Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old   
The Other Doug
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: How could NASCAR boost credibility? - 05-06-2007 , 03:16 PM




"SinghaLvr" <singhalvr (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
On Sat, 5 May 2007 23:39:07 -0400, Vandar wrote
(in article <v5c%h.7962$B25.4953 (AT) news01 (DOT) roc.ny>):


They want cars that look like they
belong on a race track....with logos that look like the ones on their
cars.

I also disagree with your disagreement on cautions. I believe that the
pits
should be effectively closed when the yellow is out forcing green flag
pit
stops and/or penalties of going a lap down for entering the pits under
caution. this would make the pit work even more meaningful and pit road
would be less congested. Furthermore, NASCAR's use of full course
cautions
on road courses is totally bogus. Local cautions in N$ events are rare
even
though they are a normal occurrence in other RR series.

NASCAR's use of road courses is totally bogus.

I love the road-courses. I wish we had more of them. However he's right:
NASCAR must learn what a "local caution" is.

It's just sooooo difficult to sell car insurance under a local caution.




Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old   
Frank from Deeetroit
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: How could NASCAR boost credibility? - 05-06-2007 , 05:30 PM




"Vandar" <vandar69 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Greg Bailey wrote:

Bear Bryant always told his players to act, when they scored a touchdown,
like they'd been to the end zone before, instead of jumping around and
whooping and hollering and celebrating.

I always admired the way Barry Sanders handled it - just hand the ref the
ball and head to the bench.

Barry was a class act.




Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old   
Frank from Deeetroit
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: How could NASCAR boost credibility? - 05-06-2007 , 05:32 PM




"Mark" <mblackwell1958 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
On May 6, 1:17 am, Vandar <vanda... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:
Greg Bailey wrote:
Bear Bryant always told his players to act, when they scored a
touchdown,
like they'd been to the end zone before, instead of jumping around and
whooping and hollering and celebrating.

I always admired the way Barry Sanders handled it - just hand the ref
the ball and head to the bench.


Burn outs do nothing but attempt to call attention to a driver that
without a solid engine man at the shop, would have engine smoke
instead of tire smoke. Like football racing is a team sport. Any
post race celebration that does not involve the entire team with the
exception of the traditional victory lap, is one that is best done
without.

That will stop when Karl Edwards does a backflip, screws it up, and he ends
up paralized, or if Tony Stewart climbs the fence, falls off, and ends up
paralized.




Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old   
Vandar
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: How could NASCAR boost credibility? - 05-06-2007 , 06:01 PM



Frank from Deeetroit wrote:

Quote:
"Vandar" <vandar69 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:Mpe%h.7968$B25.3926 (AT) news01 (DOT) roc.ny...

Greg Bailey wrote:


Bear Bryant always told his players to act, when they scored a touchdown,
like they'd been to the end zone before, instead of jumping around and
whooping and hollering and celebrating.

I always admired the way Barry Sanders handled it - just hand the ref the
ball and head to the bench.



Barry was a class act.
And probably the best running back in the history of the game. He was
certainly the most entertaining to watch.



Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old   
F S
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: How could NASCAR boost credibility? - 05-07-2007 , 02:50 AM



How about a road-course-only series for Nascar-spec cars?

"a walking contradiction, partly truth and partly fiction"


Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old   
armpit
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: How could NASCAR boost credibility? - 05-07-2007 , 08:44 AM




"The Other Doug" <SamDrucker (AT) Hootersville (DOT) org> wrote

Quote:
"SinghaLvr" <singhalvr (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C26367A90054539CF0203648 (AT) nntp (DOT) charter.net...
On Sat, 5 May 2007 23:39:07 -0400, Vandar wrote
(in article <v5c%h.7962$B25.4953 (AT) news01 (DOT) roc.ny>):


They want cars that look like they
belong on a race track....with logos that look like the ones on their
cars.

I also disagree with your disagreement on cautions. I believe that the
pits
should be effectively closed when the yellow is out forcing green flag
pit
stops and/or penalties of going a lap down for entering the pits under
caution. this would make the pit work even more meaningful and pit
road
would be less congested. Furthermore, NASCAR's use of full course
cautions
on road courses is totally bogus. Local cautions in N$ events are rare
even
though they are a normal occurrence in other RR series.

NASCAR's use of road courses is totally bogus.

I love the road-courses. I wish we had more of them. However he's
right:
NASCAR must learn what a "local caution" is.

It's just sooooo difficult to sell car insurance under a local caution.

No way. It's so easy, a caveman could do it. 8^P




Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old   
Wayne Mann
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: How could NASCAR boost credibility? - 05-07-2007 , 07:59 PM



On Sun, 06 May 2007 23:01:35 GMT, Vandar <vandar69 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
Frank from Deeetroit wrote:

"Vandar" <vandar69 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:Mpe%h.7968$B25.3926 (AT) news01 (DOT) roc.ny...

Greg Bailey wrote:


Bear Bryant always told his players to act, when they scored a touchdown,
like they'd been to the end zone before, instead of jumping around and
whooping and hollering and celebrating.

I always admired the way Barry Sanders handled it - just hand the ref the
ball and head to the bench.



Barry was a class act.

And probably the best running back in the history of the game. He was
certainly the most entertaining to watch.

No, Jim Brown was the BEST ever. Gayle Sayers may well have
been second, Sanders probably 4rth, with Sweetness 3rd! Actually the
2, 3, and 4th could be in any order, but Jim Brown was better than
any. Most people are not old enough to see him when he played, so
it's hard for them to know, but ask anyone old enough!


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.