I have a question for the group. (re: regulars)

#1

Under what twisted logic can people who no longer post here, or only post
occasionally, be considered "regulars"? Ya'll can bitch about the private
group all you want, but the discussion over there is better than I ever
remember RASN being.

#2

Ryan Cooper wrote:

Quote:

Under what twisted logic can people who no longer post here, or only
post occasionally, be considered "regulars"? Ya'll can bitch about
the private group all you want, but the discussion over there is
better than I ever remember RASN being.

Prove it. Give us a roadmap to the private group.

#3

"TeranewsUser" <FreeServer (AT) Teranews (DOT) freeserver> wrote

Quote:

Ryan Cooper wrote:
Under what twisted logic can people who no longer post here, or only
post occasionally, be considered "regulars"? Ya'll can bitch about
the private group all you want, but the discussion over there is
better than I ever remember RASN being.

Prove it. Give us a roadmap to the private group.

No, see, you don't get it. The reason the discussion in the private group is
so good is that the idiots who destroyed RASN (and created the need for the
private group), aren't allowed in.

#4

Ryan Cooper wrote:

Quote:

No, see, you don't get it. The reason the discussion in the private
group is so good is that the idiots who destroyed RASN (and created
the need for the private group), aren't allowed in.

Fuckin Notso. Him and his elitist buddies........

#5

Exactly. The discussion in the two moderated groups I run is civilized
and intelligent. As some are showing tonight, many in RASN are way
too mean spirited. Yes, that definitely includes you La Vonna.

Btw, the Steeler group is great compared to RASN. I get along fine with
everyone but one or two. I am far from hated over there. Why? Because
the people there are not hateful. They act and behave like the mature
adults they are. Some of the NASCAR fans over there are the ones who
told me they won't be back to RASN. The 'stink' from RASN has followed
me to the Steeler group and that's part of why RASN has become a total
joke on usenet.

On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:56:10 -0600, "Ryan Cooper" <ksryanc (AT) gmail (DOT) com>
wrote:

Quote:

Ya'll can bitch about the private
group all you want, but the discussion over there is better than I ever
remember RASN being.

#6

"TeranewsUser" <FreeServer (AT) Teranews (DOT) freeserver> wrote in
news:1104380872.388281b8b18b2d441f2bed304cb8314a@t eranews:

Quote:

Ryan Cooper wrote:
No, see, you don't get it. The reason the discussion in the private
group is so good is that the idiots who destroyed RASN (and created
the need for the private group), aren't allowed in.

Fuckin Notso. Him and his elitist buddies........

Hi.

--
Wheeler

#7

"Ryan Cooper" <ksryanc (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

Under what twisted logic can people who no longer post here, or only post
occasionally, be considered "regulars"? Ya'll can bitch about the private
group all you want, but the discussion over there is better than I ever
remember RASN being.

Are you recruiting new members? Or just letting us know what pieces of
worthless shit we'all are here?

#8

"Ryan Cooper" <ksryanc (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in news

%KAd.4276$2_4.566
@okepread06:

Quote:

Under what twisted logic can people who no longer post here, or only post
occasionally, be considered "regulars"? Ya'll can bitch about the private
group all you want, but the discussion over there is better than I ever
remember RASN being.

But to be perfectly honest, we don't talk about NASCAR that much.

Strange, eh?

--
Wheeler

#9

"Wheeler" <jsebright (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

"Ryan Cooper" <ksryanc (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in news

%KAd.4276$2_4.566
@okepread06:

Under what twisted logic can people who no longer post here, or only
post
occasionally, be considered "regulars"? Ya'll can bitch about the
private
group all you want, but the discussion over there is better than I ever
remember RASN being.

But to be perfectly honest, we don't talk about NASCAR that much.

Strange, eh?

--
Wheeler

Indeed.

Maybe it's because for the most part we follow Linus' advice: "I've learned
there are three things you don't discuss with people: religion, politics and
the Great Pumpkin."

#10

"Ryan Cooper" <ksryanc (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in
news:mXMAd.4283$2_4.1483@okepread06:

Quote:

Maybe it's because for the most part we follow Linus' advice: "I've
learned there are three things you don't discuss with people:
religion, politics and the Great Pumpkin."

The Great Pumpkin is gay. As proof, i offer up the NSFW goatse jack
o'lantern:
http://sam.zoy.org/fun/goatse/pumpkin.jpg

Bud