![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#21
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Thomas" <wharry (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:f1tlab$r1e$1 (AT) news04 (DOT) infoave.net... Well, those of us who actually graduated high school and pursued a higher education know what it means. I went to one of the top universities on the planet. I have a high-end education. Why isn't that evident ??? |
#22
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Thomas" <wharry (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:f1tkm6$qc5$1 (AT) news04 (DOT) infoave.net... Naturally is not enough. "Naturally," NASCAR would remain a sport based in the Southeastern US, with only white drivers, white crew chiefs, white owners and white fans. Naturally doesn't get it done. For someone so highly educated, ...... you lack intuition. This is not to say that the above scenario will get it done - but "naturally" always gets it done. |
#23
| |||
| |||
|
|
There were basically no minorities in NASCAR at any level until they started their diversity program. |
#24
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thomas wrote in rec.autos.sport.nascar: There were basically no minorities in NASCAR at any level until they started their diversity program. Willy T Ribbs on Line One. |
#25
| |||
| |||
|
|
Because you are an imbecile. |
|
All I can do is post intelligent, logical arguments. If you're too fucking dumb to understand them, that's YOUR shortcoming, not mine. |
|
-Thomas |
#26
| |||
| |||
|
|
Same thing is happening in my first love, the NHL. |
|
-Thomas |
#27
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Mike/Speeed wrote: "Mike Marlow" <mmarlow (AT) alltel (DOT) net> wrote in message news:b0079$4641b02f$471fb881$32266 (AT) ALLTEL (DOT) NET... "Thomas" <wharry (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:f1s0vs$2qq$1 (AT) news04 (DOT) infoave.net... What's your point? NASCAR *does* need more diversity. What does that have to do with the discussion at hand, troll-boy? That's an interesting assertion. I'm not against diversity at all (as long as it occurs naturally), but just why do you say so emphatically, that NASCAR *does* need more diversity? He does so as to further an agenda. He guises himself as a "high end educated" (whatever that was supposed to mean), Well, those of us who actually graduated high school and pursued a higher education know what it means. I went to one of the top universities on the planet. I have a high-end education. |
|
conservative individual, Which I am. |
|
but does nothing more than spout liberal clichés, argues against anything even remotely conservative, You mean like when I said I support flying the Confederate flag? THAT kind of liberalism? |
|
What liberal cliches have I spouted? |
|
and questions the intelligence of anyone with an opposing viewpoint. No, I question the intelligence of small-minded bigots and overt racists. |
|
If you wanted to post an intelligent argument in response to something I have said, go right ahead. |
|
namecall and make idiotic comments. |
|
constructing a logical argument, so yes, I question your intelligence, kiddo. |
|
His actions are those of a textbook liberal. Any rational thinking individual understands that "diversity" for the sake of diversity only, helps no one - except for those who spout the virtues of the concept, and gain power as a result. Wow. So I have said we need diversity for diversity's sake? Cite a quote. With a link. |
|
I never said such a thing. I said NASCAR needs to increase diversity for MONEY. Yeah, real liberal concept there. |
|
to expose NASCAR to new markets and then exploit those markets for profit. I am channeling Karl Marx now. *rolls eyes* |
|
It's kind of sad that you are too fucking stupid to even grasp the concepts I have posted. |
|
"diversity" and assume the person saying it is a liberal. |
|
You embody every stereotype that liberals place on conservatives and southerners. |
|
break down stereotypes, |
|
Most conservatives judge people by their actions, not their skin color, sexual orientation, country of origin, etc. A true liberal feels the need to point out people's differences as if that is somehow noble, and tries to mold society to fit their agenda under the premise that this is done so for the betterment of mankind. Again, where did I do that? |
|
Did I say that it was noble for the openly gay NASCAR driver to be gay? Did I say that it was a positive or a negative that he is gay? Or did I just point out that there is one? |
|
You know, there was a message behind that post, and it's sad that you are too fucking stupid to have gotten it. |
|
Anyone who bases the validity of their life on the short period of time spent in college has some deep seeded issues that years of therapy probably couldn't repair. I don't base the validity of my life on college, kiddo. I just pointed out that you are an ignorant, uneducated, bigoted redneck. I am not bragging about how valid my life is. I am pointing out how pathetic yours is. |
|
I learned far more after I graduated college from life experience than I did within the boundaries of those four, short years. A couple classes at a community college is not "graduating college," moron. |
|
Take my advise: killfile him. Other than trumpeting liberal causes and insulting anyone with an opposing viewpoint, he has nothing else to offer the ng. *yawn* Says the resident newsgroup troll. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |