 | |
The Lawsuit/MayMethNathcar
Nascar NASCAR and other professional stock car racing (rec.autos.sport.nascar)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
 
| |||
| |||
|
The Lawsuit/MayMethNathcar -
07-17-2009
, 06:02 PM
|
http://media.charlotteobserver.com/images/pdf/mayfield.pdf Ya'll see that? That there is the link to the suit that MayMaynotmethfield has filed in North Carolina. It's a VERY interesting read. If any of it's true, then no freakin wonder Nascar is trying like hell to put the stink all on Jeremey. They stand to be in more trouble than just Mayfeild's lawsuit. If this is true, they violated state and federal guidelines, AND did do some slanderous crap. I remember the press conference where they said 'recreational drugs" and such.. and I don't care who Mr Black is.. a presribed drug that is legally prescribed by a practicing medical doctor in good standing with state and local regs, has no right in calling it anything else but what it is.. and wow.. just give that thing a gander if you wish.. you'll see some stuff no readily said by Nascar on this issue.. |
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have a question. Is the July 6th sample the first test given to JM "BY NASCAR" since he failed the test that started this whole mess? The test he failed first was on or about May 1st. I do appreciate all answers. On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:11:02 -0000, "michael" <.... (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net> wrote: http://media.charlotteobserver.com/images/pdf/mayfield.pdf Ya'll see that? That there is the link to the suit that MayMaynotmethfield has filed in North Carolina. It's a VERY interesting read. If any of it's true, then no freakin wonder Nascar is trying like hell to put the stink all on Jeremey. They stand to be in more trouble than just Mayfeild's lawsuit. If this is true, they violated state and federal guidelines, AND did do some slanderous crap. I remember the press conference where they said 'recreational drugs" and such.. and I don't care who Mr Black is.. a presribed drug that is legally prescribed by a practicing medical doctor in good standing with state and local regs, has no right in calling it anything else but what it is.. and wow.. just give that thing a gander if you wish.. you'll see some stuff no readily said by Nascar on this issue.. |
one on july 6th was the first one given to jeremy mayfield by nascar
since the suspension. mayfield claims to have submitted up to 15 tests
to independent labs which have all shown up negative, the only two
that have come back postive are the nascar tests done by aegis labs
and dr black who are interestingly defendants in mayfield's lawsuit
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Idn't that weird? See, somehow, someone that is a staff memeber of Penn State Ortho and Rehab State College is the one asking question of Mayfiled regarding his prescription in take and other things.. Aukerman is his name. He doesn't work for Aegis or Nascar, and yet, he's got inside knowledge of this? He doesn't even work for a 'compliant' lab.. yet he's requesting documents so that he can submit a 'negative' result.. one that they never did send? the lawsuit does mention the first test on May the 2nd, and Mayfield's contacting Mr Black on the 3rd. Again, I ask, who is Mr Black that he can say a result is negative because he disagrees with a Doctor's prognosis? He has no degree showing him to be an MD, so what the hell? To me, it's like it's been said.. Mayfield was probably looked at as someone that would take his licks, be the example that Nascar was going to use to keep the drivers in line, and I think they had some knowledge of Jeremey's medical issues, and decided he'd be an easy target, as he was also percieved as low end, and not able to take on Grandaddy Nascar. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have a question. Is the July 6th sample the first test given to JM "BY NASCAR" since he failed the test that started this whole mess? The test he failed first was on or about May 1st. I do appreciate all answers. |
test him. Once the injunction was granted, they had a reason to test him
(he may show up), so they did.
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Jul 17, 6:02*pm, A. Jones <ajo... (AT) intrtek (DOT) com> wrote: I have a question. Is the July 6th sample the first test given to JM "BY NASCAR" since he failed the test that started this whole mess? The test he failed first was on or about May 1st. I do appreciate all answers. the may 1st test was a random drug test at richmond i believe. this one on july 6th was the first one given to jeremy mayfield by nascar since the suspension. mayfield claims to have submitted up to 15 tests to independent labs which have all shown up negative, the only two that have come back postive are the nascar tests done by aegis labs and dr black who are interestingly defendants in mayfield's lawsuit |
comments, in all these interviews he's doing, about how he has passed
all kinds of tests since May 1st made me start to wonder. Glad I did
understand correctly before saying he's guilty.
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
A. Jones wrote: I have a question. Is the July 6th sample the first test given to JM "BY NASCAR" since he failed the test that started this whole mess? The test he failed first was on or about May 1st. I do appreciate all answers. Yes. He was suspended after the May test, so NASCAR had no reason to test him. Once the injunction was granted, they had a reason to test him (he may show up), so they did. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:40:51 -0700 (PDT), Fish godwin.da... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: On Jul 17, 6:02*pm, A. Jones <ajo... (AT) intrtek (DOT) com> wrote: I have a question. Is the July 6th sample the first test given to JM "BY NASCAR" since he failed the test that started this whole mess? The test he failed first was on or about May 1st. I do appreciate all answers. the may 1st test was a random drug test at richmond i believe. this one on july 6th was the first one given to jeremy mayfield by nascar since the suspension. mayfield claims to have submitted up to 15 tests to independent labs which have all shown up negative, the only two that have come back postive are the nascar tests done by aegis labs and dr black who are interestingly defendants in mayfield's lawsuit Thank you. That was the impression I had in my mind. Reading JM's comments, in all these interviews he's doing, about how he has passed all kinds of tests since May 1st made me start to wonder. Glad I did understand correctly before saying he's guilty. |
3 or 4 days he says, but not the two nascar has given him which is
where the confusion comes from.
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Jul 17, 6:56*pm, A. Jones <ajo... (AT) intrtek (DOT) com> wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:40:51 -0700 (PDT), Fish godwin.da... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: On Jul 17, 6:02*pm, A. Jones <ajo... (AT) intrtek (DOT) com> wrote: I have a question. Is the July 6th sample the first test given to JM "BY NASCAR" since he failed the test that started this whole mess? The test he failed first was on or about May 1st. I do appreciate all answers. the may 1st test was a random drug test at richmond i believe. this one on july 6th was the first one given to jeremy mayfield by nascar since the suspension. mayfield claims to have submitted up to 15 tests to independent labs which have all shown up negative, the only two that have come back postive are the nascar tests done by aegis labs and dr black who are interestingly defendants in mayfield's lawsuit Thank you. That was the impression I had in my mind. Reading JM's comments, in all these interviews he's doing, about how he has passed all kinds of tests since May 1st made me start to wonder. Glad I did understand correctly before saying he's guilty. yes he has passed the voluntary independent tests he's been doing ever 3 or 4 days he says, but not the two nascar has given him which is where the confusion comes from. |
sometime (a day?) before NASCAR's second test, and then again "at an
emergency room" some 35 minutes after NASCAR's second test? If just
one testing facility could stand up and say it's not meth.
And what is this 24/7 "documentary" done by some of his "friends" who
are "in the movie business, kinda, out in LA"? That makes me ask, is
this guy on drugs?
I feel for Jeremy's plight. I really do. But, it seems like he needs a
little less talk and a lot more proof.
I have not exactly scoured over every news article, as this apparent
self-destruction makes me nauseous, but when is the next court
hearing? I guess that's when we'll get some facts.
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.