![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
Probably after the first 5 races since technically they are still using last years standings for the top 35 + Robby Gordon for some reason. Now THAT is the only thing suspicious. |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
The LFD on the pole? That's almost fair, let's set starting positions by last years owners points. Let's not use this years point standings, something that would make sense. Or draw a number out of hat which would be the only fair way to do it since no one earned a starting position. And if they are going to use points from a previous year, why use last years? Why not use the owners points from 5,10,15 or 20 years ago. It makes as much sense. NASCAR at it finest, rigged in favor of the big teams and big money. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Electrician" <electrician (AT) xo (DOT) com> wrote in message news:v40Vf.311$b07.260 (AT) trnddc05 (DOT) .. The LFD on the pole? That's almost fair, let's set starting positions by last years owners points. Let's not use this years point standings, something that would make sense. Or draw a number out of hat which would be the only fair way to do it since no one earned a starting position. And if they are going to use points from a previous year, why use last years? Why not use the owners points from 5,10,15 or 20 years ago. It makes as much sense. NASCAR at it finest, rigged in favor of the big teams and big money. Why don't we just have fan pick for all starting positions. And, like days of old when only property owners could vote, each fan gets one vote for each ticket stub they have for the races they have attended. |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Mike Smith" <mike_z (AT) excite (DOT) com> wrote in message news:k8f922dp4kmi07i4olpm1gcbna56or66ba (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:30:51 -0500, RES2CUE28 not_here_nor_there (AT) anywhere (DOT) com> wrote: Ron wrote: Electrician wrote: The LFD on the pole? That's almost fair, let's set starting positions by last years owners points. Let's not use this years point standings, something that would make sense. Or draw a number out of hat which would be the only fair way to do it since no one earned a starting position. And if they are going to use points from a previous year, why use last years? Why not use the owners points from 5,10,15 or 20 years ago. It makes as much sense. NASCAR at it finest, rigged in favor of the big teams and big money. It's been that way for yrs. ummm, I thought whithin the last 2-3 yrs, the drivers lined up according to present point standings when qualifying was rained out... Probably after the first 5 races since technically they are still using last years standings for the top 35 + Robby Gordon for some reason. Now THAT is the only thing suspicious. Maybe I missed the memo on this, but they do still start 43 cars at Bristol, right? The question is: How do they determine starting positions 36-43? This years points? Last years? I would imagine that Texas Terry gets one for the champions provisional, so that leaves 7 spots. |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
It's been that way for yrs. |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
shhhhh.... it's always fun watching the morons babble... ![]() |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
"armpit" <armarmpitpit (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message news:442539ee$0$20110$834e42db (AT) reader (DOT) greatnowhere.com... "Mike Smith" <mike_z (AT) excite (DOT) com> wrote in message news:k8f922dp4kmi07i4olpm1gcbna56or66ba (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:30:51 -0500, RES2CUE28 not_here_nor_there (AT) anywhere (DOT) com> wrote: Ron wrote: Electrician wrote: The LFD on the pole? That's almost fair, let's set starting positions by last years owners points. Let's not use this years point standings, something that would make sense. Or draw a number out of hat which would be the only fair way to do it since no one earned a starting position. And if they are going to use points from a previous year, why use last years? Why not use the owners points from 5,10,15 or 20 years ago. It makes as much sense. NASCAR at it finest, rigged in favor of the big teams and big money. It's been that way for yrs. ummm, I thought whithin the last 2-3 yrs, the drivers lined up according to present point standings when qualifying was rained out... Probably after the first 5 races since technically they are still using last years standings for the top 35 + Robby Gordon for some reason. Now THAT is the only thing suspicious. Maybe I missed the memo on this, but they do still start 43 cars at Bristol, right? The question is: How do they determine starting positions 36-43? This years points? Last years? I would imagine that Texas Terry gets one for the champions provisional, so that leaves 7 spots. If only there was somewhere a person could go to find this stuff out, like some kind of information center that's accessible somehow, hrmmm........ What happens if qualifying gets rained out? If it is the first 5 races of the season, the previous season OWNERS points are used: #1) - Previous season Owner Points [position 1-35] #2) - Race winners from the previous and current season not already in the field #3) - Past Nextel Cup Champions not in by 1 or 2 #4) - Current season Owner Points [Top 35][not in by rules 1-3] #5) - Current season race attempts ties broken by current owners points standings [not in by rules 1-4] After the 5th race of the season, the current season OWNERS points are used: #1) - First 35 by current Owner Points #2) - Last Years Cup Champ or the Event Champion if not already in the field #3) - Car Owners whose team has won in the previous and current season not already in the field #4) - Drivers who have won in the previous and current season not already in the field #5) - Past Nextel Cup Champions not in by 1 thru 4 #6) - Qualifying Attempts with Owners points as the tie breaker #7) - Qualifying Order Position (all above apply as long as the team was entered by the entry deadline - usually 7-13 days before the race) |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
| Probably after the first 5 races since technically they are still using last years standings for the top 35 + Robby Gordon for some reason. Now THAT is the only thing suspicious. I think that those sneaky bastards at NASCAR are unfairly using the rule book to set the starting lineup. They probably had all that rain brought in too, just to get their favorites in the field and with good starting places. |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <1143254967.939375.148470 (AT) g10g2000cwb (DOT) googlegroups.com>, BigELilE05 (AT) msn (DOT) com says... It's been that way for yrs. I guess that makes it fair then. |
#20
| |||
| |||
|
|
Electrician wrote: In article 1143254967.939375.148470 (AT) g10g20...oglegroups.com>, BigELilE05 (AT) msn (DOT) com says... It's been that way for yrs. I guess that makes it fair then. What's not fair, IMO, is giving a spot to Terry L for something he accomplished 10 yrs ago. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |