Mayfield interview...

#11

On Jul 17, 11:11*pm, TS02_05champ <tonystewart02_05ch... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com>
wrote:

Quote:

Fish wrote:

quote from mikemulhern.net "A forensic drug analysis report from
LabCorp, signed by director William Lynn and dated July 17th, says
that the test showed "none detected" in specimens performed for
amphetamine and methamphetamine, by gas chromatography/mass
spectrometry. The report was provided by one of Mayfield's lawyers,
John Buric, to a Charlotte television station."

Yeah, but when was the test taken? And who is Mike Mulhern?

this is the test that i'm assuming was one of the three taken on july
the 6th, the same day as nascar's latest test. where mayfield said he
submitted to three tests in a single day, an independent one earlier
in the day, a nascar one 3 hours later and another 35 mins later.

#12

TS02_05champ <tonystewart02_05champ (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in news:4a613d02$0
$5675$9a6e19ea (AT) unlimited (DOT) newshosting.com:

Quote:

Fish wrote:

quote from mikemulhern.net "A forensic drug analysis report from
LabCorp, signed by director William Lynn and dated July 17th, says
that the test showed "none detected" in specimens performed for
amphetamine and methamphetamine, by gas chromatography/mass
spectrometry. The report was provided by one of Mayfield's lawyers,
John Buric, to a Charlotte television station."

Yeah, but when was the test taken?

When is perhaps not so important as where and how. LabCorp's
technical abilities are unimpeachable, if they said the sample
is clean then there is no question that it is clean. So the
question becomes how certain can we be that the sample was
from Mayfield and was not tampered with before LabCorb got it.

Quote:

And who is Mike Mulhern?

Highly regarded (*) journalist, formerly with the Winston-Salem
Journal, now an independant.

John

(* except by the France family, who apparently dislike him
almost as much as they dislike Matt McLaughlin.)

#13

Vandar wrote:

Quote:

Fish wrote:
On Jul 17, 10:08 pm, Fish <godwin.da... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

On Jul 17, 7:04 pm, twisted <thenited... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

EXCLUSIVE VIDEO:
Mayfield Speaks About Testing Issues
for 20 Min

Updated: Friday, 17 Jul 2009, 4:15 PM EDT
Published : Friday, 17 Jul 2009, 2:26 PM EDT

CATAWBA, NC - Going against the wishes of his attorney, embattled
NASCAR Driver Jeremy Mayfield speaks for almost 20 minutes! In a FOX
Charlotte Exclusive, Mayfield discusses his drug testing problems, his
relationship with NASCAR and his plans going forward - including a
film crew!

Copyright FOX Charlotte/ WCCB-TV

http://www.foxcharlotte.com/dpp/news/NASCAR_driver_Jeremy_Mayfield_in...

i read on espn i believe that this film crew that's been with him 24/7
has it all on tape when he got lost in this crucial "18 minutes" he
had to get to the nascar drug test, but also when he went to the
independent labs so hopefully he'll release this soon...

quote from mikemulhern.net "A forensic drug analysis report from
LabCorp, signed by director William Lynn and dated July 17th, says
that the test showed "none detected" in specimens performed for
amphetamine and methamphetamine, by gas chromatography/mass
spectrometry. The report was provided by one of Mayfield's lawyers,
John Buric, to a Charlotte television station."

GC-MS testing is done to confirm a *positive* immunoassay test. And the
report doesn't say anything about dilution, which NASCAR said was an
issue. Dilution is the reason the DOT has the right to directly observe
a sample being given, which NASCAR did with Mayfield but we have not
heard that LabCorp did. For all we know, Mayfield had LabCorp test a
sample given by his attorney.

Having taken many drug tests myself, I highly doubt that JM's atty went
into the bathroom, pissed in a cup, handed it to the lab tech, and they
tested it as JM's sample.

#14

TS02_05champ wrote:

Quote:

Vandar wrote:

Fish wrote:

On Jul 17, 10:08 pm, Fish <godwin.da... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

On Jul 17, 7:04 pm, twisted <thenited... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

EXCLUSIVE VIDEO:
Mayfield Speaks About Testing Issues
for 20 Min

Updated: Friday, 17 Jul 2009, 4:15 PM EDT
Published : Friday, 17 Jul 2009, 2:26 PM EDT

CATAWBA, NC - Going against the wishes of his attorney, embattled
NASCAR Driver Jeremy Mayfield speaks for almost 20 minutes! In a FOX
Charlotte Exclusive, Mayfield discusses his drug testing problems, his
relationship with NASCAR and his plans going forward - including a
film crew!

Copyright FOX Charlotte/ WCCB-TV

http://www.foxcharlotte.com/dpp/news/NASCAR_driver_Jeremy_Mayfield_in...

i read on espn i believe that this film crew that's been with him 24/7
has it all on tape when he got lost in this crucial "18 minutes" he
had to get to the nascar drug test, but also when he went to the
independent labs so hopefully he'll release this soon...

quote from mikemulhern.net "A forensic drug analysis report from
LabCorp, signed by director William Lynn and dated July 17th, says
that the test showed "none detected" in specimens performed for
amphetamine and methamphetamine, by gas chromatography/mass
spectrometry. The report was provided by one of Mayfield's lawyers,
John Buric, to a Charlotte television station."

GC-MS testing is done to confirm a *positive* immunoassay test. And
the report doesn't say anything about dilution, which NASCAR said was
an issue. Dilution is the reason the DOT has the right to directly
observe a sample being given, which NASCAR did with Mayfield but we
have not heard that LabCorp did. For all we know, Mayfield had LabCorp
test a sample given by his attorney.

Having taken many drug tests myself, I highly doubt that JM's atty went
into the bathroom, pissed in a cup, handed it to the lab tech, and they
tested it as JM's sample.

As long as it's a voluntary test, you can walk in with a sample in hand
and ask them to test it. They'll be more than happy to take your money
and run the test on whatever you hand them.

#15

"John McCoy" <igopogo (AT) ix (DOT) netcom.com> wrote

Quote:

TS02_05champ <tonystewart02_05champ (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in news:4a613d02$0

<snip>

Quote:

And who is Mike Mulhern?

Highly regarded (*) journalist, formerly with the Winston-Salem
Journal, now an independant.

John

(* except by the France family, who apparently dislike him
almost as much as they dislike Matt McLaughlin.)

....and the holder-of-the-tape-recorder-that-Smoke-swatted-away.

:-)

--
Tom in Bristol

#16

Vandar wrote:

Quote:

TS02_05champ wrote:

Vandar wrote:

Fish wrote:

On Jul 17, 10:08 pm, Fish <godwin.da... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

On Jul 17, 7:04 pm, twisted <thenited... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

EXCLUSIVE VIDEO:
Mayfield Speaks About Testing Issues
for 20 Min

Updated: Friday, 17 Jul 2009, 4:15 PM EDT
Published : Friday, 17 Jul 2009, 2:26 PM EDT

CATAWBA, NC - Going against the wishes of his attorney, embattled
NASCAR Driver Jeremy Mayfield speaks for almost 20 minutes! In a FOX
Charlotte Exclusive, Mayfield discusses his drug testing problems,
his
relationship with NASCAR and his plans going forward - including a
film crew!

Copyright FOX Charlotte/ WCCB-TV

http://www.foxcharlotte.com/dpp/news/NASCAR_driver_Jeremy_Mayfield_in...

i read on espn i believe that this film crew that's been with him 24/7
has it all on tape when he got lost in this crucial "18 minutes" he
had to get to the nascar drug test, but also when he went to the
independent labs so hopefully he'll release this soon...

quote from mikemulhern.net "A forensic drug analysis report from
LabCorp, signed by director William Lynn and dated July 17th, says
that the test showed "none detected" in specimens performed for
amphetamine and methamphetamine, by gas chromatography/mass
spectrometry. The report was provided by one of Mayfield's lawyers,
John Buric, to a Charlotte television station."

GC-MS testing is done to confirm a *positive* immunoassay test. And
the report doesn't say anything about dilution, which NASCAR said was
an issue. Dilution is the reason the DOT has the right to directly
observe a sample being given, which NASCAR did with Mayfield but we
have not heard that LabCorp did. For all we know, Mayfield had
LabCorp test a sample given by his attorney.

Having taken many drug tests myself, I highly doubt that JM's atty
went into the bathroom, pissed in a cup, handed it to the lab tech,
and they tested it as JM's sample.

As long as it's a voluntary test, you can walk in with a sample in hand
and ask them to test it. They'll be more than happy to take your money
and run the test on whatever you hand them.

True, but if everything has been documented on film as JM claims, I
don't see him just driving up to a lab and handing them a sample. If he
truly wants to prove his innocence, he will do it (did it) just like an
employer asking for a drug test. He also mentioned that NASCAR never
asked for a hair sample. I wonder if one of the supposedly 15 negative
test was a hair sample? If so, NASCAR is screwed.

#17

TS02_05champ wrote:

Quote:

Vandar wrote:

TS02_05champ wrote:

Vandar wrote:

Fish wrote:

On Jul 17, 10:08 pm, Fish <godwin.da... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

On Jul 17, 7:04 pm, twisted <thenited... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

EXCLUSIVE VIDEO:
Mayfield Speaks About Testing Issues
for 20 Min

Updated: Friday, 17 Jul 2009, 4:15 PM EDT
Published : Friday, 17 Jul 2009, 2:26 PM EDT

CATAWBA, NC - Going against the wishes of his attorney, embattled
NASCAR Driver Jeremy Mayfield speaks for almost 20 minutes! In a FOX
Charlotte Exclusive, Mayfield discusses his drug testing
problems, his
relationship with NASCAR and his plans going forward - including a
film crew!

Copyright FOX Charlotte/ WCCB-TV

http://www.foxcharlotte.com/dpp/news/NASCAR_driver_Jeremy_Mayfield_in...

i read on espn i believe that this film crew that's been with him
24/7
has it all on tape when he got lost in this crucial "18 minutes" he
had to get to the nascar drug test, but also when he went to the
independent labs so hopefully he'll release this soon...

quote from mikemulhern.net "A forensic drug analysis report from
LabCorp, signed by director William Lynn and dated July 17th, says
that the test showed "none detected" in specimens performed for
amphetamine and methamphetamine, by gas chromatography/mass
spectrometry. The report was provided by one of Mayfield's lawyers,
John Buric, to a Charlotte television station."

GC-MS testing is done to confirm a *positive* immunoassay test. And
the report doesn't say anything about dilution, which NASCAR said
was an issue. Dilution is the reason the DOT has the right to
directly observe a sample being given, which NASCAR did with
Mayfield but we have not heard that LabCorp did. For all we know,
Mayfield had LabCorp test a sample given by his attorney.

Having taken many drug tests myself, I highly doubt that JM's atty
went into the bathroom, pissed in a cup, handed it to the lab tech,
and they tested it as JM's sample.

As long as it's a voluntary test, you can walk in with a sample in
hand and ask them to test it. They'll be more than happy to take your
money and run the test on whatever you hand them.

True, but if everything has been documented on film as JM claims, I
don't see him just driving up to a lab and handing them a sample. If he
truly wants to prove his innocence, he will do it (did it) just like an
employer asking for a drug test. He also mentioned that NASCAR never
asked for a hair sample. I wonder if one of the supposedly 15 negative
test was a hair sample? If so, NASCAR is screwed.

The way Mayfield has been acting lately, I suspect that if such footage
existed, he would've released it already. It would completely vindicate him.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Mayfield interview...

Nascar NASCAR and other professional stock car racing (rec.autos.sport.nascar)

Re: Mayfield interview... - 07-18-2009 , 10:42 AM

Re: Mayfield interview... - 07-18-2009 , 11:09 AM

Re: Mayfield interview... - 07-18-2009 , 01:53 PM

Re: Mayfield interview... - 07-18-2009 , 02:30 PM

Re: Mayfield interview... - 07-18-2009 , 10:07 PM

Re: Mayfield interview... - 07-19-2009 , 12:55 AM

Re: Mayfield interview... - 07-19-2009 , 07:44 AM