Like it really matters.



Court rules in NASCAR's favor; Mayfield suspended: An appeals court has
ruled in NASCAR's favor, granting its request to keep Jeremy Mayfield
off the race track. The decision Friday by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals means Mayfield is once again suspended for failing a May 1
random drug test. A federal judge lifted the driver's suspension July 1,
and NASCAR appealed to the appeals court in Richmond, Va. That court
issued a stay until the appeal can be heard. U.S. District Court Graham
Mullen, who allowed Mayfield to return to competition, still has a
request before him to overturn his earlier decision based on NASCAR's
claim that Mayfield tested positive for methamphetamine a second time.
Mayfield is not entered in Sunday's race at Indy.(Associated
Press)(7-24-2009)

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:53:11 -0400, TS02_05champ
<tonystewart02_05champ (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

It doesn't. The second NASCAR test was lights out for JM.

Funny how when NA$CAR gives the test, he fails. But when an
*independent" lab does the test, a few minutes later, it is negative.

This ain't over yet.

Ted

Ted wrote:

Or...
Funny how when Mayfield pays the lab, it's negative. When Mayfield
doesn't pay lab, it's positive.

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:22:52 GMT, Ted <tbucket (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

I hope not. Still, to me, NASCAR looks more credible at this point.

Vandar wrote:
But the lab was not affiliated with Mayfield or NA$CAR. Result was
negative. The test given by a NA$CAR paid "doctor" and tested in a
NA$CAR affiliated lab came back positive.

That won't stand up in court. Mayfield's test will.

Ted

Ted wrote:

Aegis' results will definitely stand up in court.