 | |
Mike bites it again
Nascar NASCAR and other professional stock car racing (rec.autos.sport.nascar)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
 
| |||
| |||
|
Re: Mike bites it again -
05-08-2009
, 10:08 PM
|
Please define the fence's job. If it is supposed to protect the fans from injury, it failed. |
and keep it contained to the track... the CATCHFENCE did it's job... now do
yours, dance...
#22
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 08 May 2009 19:02:35 -0400, TS02_05champ tonystewart02_05ch... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: Electrician wrote: The babbling moron Joy once again demonstrates he knows absolutely nothing about NASCAR nor has an independent thought other than what NASCAR tells him to say. The debris that flew into the crowd when Edwards hit the fencewas apparent to anyone watching the broadcast. You can apologize now. Mike Joy just said that he misspoke and meant that no *large* debris flew into the crowd. That there is always gonna be *smaller* debris that flies into the crowd with an accident like that, but the fence did it's job. Please define the fence's job. If it is supposed to protect the fans from injury, it failed. |
The car stayed on the fence side of the track and the car and the
fence itself did not hit the fans.
Yes some shrapnel got into a few fans for relative minor injuries, the
broken jaw being the only seemingly serious one.
So, NASCAR and the track will look at the films, figure out what
happened and make improvements to avoid that from happening again.
Chicken Little is wrong again.
AHEM!
NO ONE DIED!
#23
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 08 May 2009 19:02:35 -0400, TS02_05champ tonystewart02_05champ (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: Electrician wrote: The babbling moron Joy once again demonstrates he knows absolutely nothing about NASCAR nor has an independent thought other than what NASCAR tells him to say. The debris that flew into the crowd when Edwards hit the fence was apparent to anyone watching the broadcast. You can apologize now. Mike Joy just said that he misspoke and meant that no *large* debris flew into the crowd. That there is always gonna be *smaller* debris that flies into the crowd with an accident like that, but the fence did it's job. Please define the fence's job. If it is supposed to protect the fans from injury, it failed. Electrician is right. MJ needs to be an independent thinker instead of letting NASCAR dictate his opinions to him. Mike might actually be satisfied with the way the fence performed, but who can tell for sure when he always defends NASCAR's position on everything. Every comment and opinion seems insincere, disingenuous. |
proves its total lack of knowledge.
As others have said, the fence kept the car in the track area... junk got
through and junk always will... at least it wasn't hood sized pieces like
Ervans hood off the #28 at Daytona 1 year.
And for the record...in a lot of peoples opinion, Mike Joy has more
knowledge and 10X the credibility in his sweat than Janal will ever hope
to achieve in 1000 lifetimes.
Go away little man and leave reporting to reporters...12 yr olds know how
to cut and paste.
#24
| |||
| |||
|
|
On May 8, 8:01*pm, A. Jones <ajo... (AT) intrtek (DOT) com> wrote: On Fri, 08 May 2009 19:02:35 -0400, TS02_05champ tonystewart02_05ch... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: Electrician wrote: The babbling moron Joy once again demonstrates he knows absolutely nothing about NASCAR nor has an independent thought other than what NASCAR tells him to say. The debris that flew into the crowd when Edwards hit the fence was apparent to anyone watching the broadcast. You can apologize now. Mike Joy just said that he misspoke and meant that no *large* debris flew into the crowd. That there is always gonna be *smaller* debris that flies into the crowd with an accident like that, but the fence did it's job. Please define the fence's job. If it is supposed to protect the fans from injury, it failed. Au Contraire. The car stayed on the fence side of the track and the car and the fence itself did not hit the fans. Yes some shrapnel got into a few fans for relative minor injuries, the broken jaw being the only seemingly serious one. So, NASCAR and the track will look at the films, figure out what happened and make improvements to avoid that from happening again. Chicken Little is wrong again. AHEM! NO ONE DIED! |
is about whether more needs to be done to protect the fans. I cannot
understand why anyone would think that is not a good idea.
I do not understand why the mere mention of safety makes some fans
bristle with contempt. "No one died"... Is that the measure of safety?
I'm only asking people, Mike Joy and especially NASCAR, to acknowledge
there is a problem and that we should at least TRY to do something to
improve fan safety. Why does that make me wrong?
#25
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 8 May 2009 19:18:23 -0700 (PDT), DAVe <smalleyster (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote: On May 8, 8:01*pm, A. Jones <ajo... (AT) intrtek (DOT) com> wrote: On Fri, 08 May 2009 19:02:35 -0400, TS02_05champ tonystewart02_05ch... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: Electrician wrote: The babbling moron Joy once again demonstrates he knows absolutely nothing about NASCAR nor has an independent thought other than what NASCAR tells him to say. The debris that flew into the crowd when Edwards hit the fence was apparent to anyone watching the broadcast. You can apologize now. Mike Joy just said that he misspoke and meant that no *large* debris flew into the crowd. That there is always gonna be *smaller* debris that flies into the crowd with an accident like that, but the fence did it's job. Please define the fence's job. If it is supposed to protect the fans from injury, it failed. Au Contraire. The car stayed on the fence side of the track and the car and the fence itself did not hit the fans. Yes some shrapnel got into a few fans for relative minor injuries, the broken jaw being the only seemingly serious one. So, NASCAR and the track will look at the films, figure out what happened and make improvements to avoid that from happening again. Chicken Little is wrong again. AHEM! NO ONE DIED! Chicken Little? I'm not saying NASCAR's sky is falling. For me, this is about whether more needs to be done to protect the fans. I cannot understand why anyone would think that is not a good idea. I do not understand why the mere mention of safety makes some fans bristle with contempt. "No one died"... Is that the measure of safety? I'm only asking people, Mike Joy and especially NASCAR, to acknowledge there is a problem and that we should at least TRY to do something to improve fan safety. Why does that make me wrong? |
television.
Dale BrightŪ
"non compos mentis"
#26
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 8 May 2009 19:18:23 -0700 (PDT), DAVe <smalleys... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote: On May 8, 8:01*pm, A. Jones <ajo... (AT) intrtek (DOT) com> wrote: On Fri, 08 May 2009 19:02:35 -0400, TS02_05champ tonystewart02_05ch... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: Electrician wrote: The babbling moron Joy once again demonstrates he knows absolutely nothing about NASCAR nor has an independent thought other than what NASCAR tells him to say. The debris that flew into the crowd when Edwards hit the fence was apparent to anyone watching the broadcast. You can apologize now. Mike Joy just said that he misspoke and meant that no *large* debris flew into the crowd. That there is always gonna be *smaller* debris that flies into the crowd with an accident like that, but the fence did it's job. Please define the fence's job. If it is supposed to protect the fans from injury, it failed. Au Contraire. The car stayed on the fence side of the track and the car and the fence itself did not hit the fans. Yes some shrapnel got into a few fans for relative minor injuries, the broken jaw being the only seemingly serious one. So, NASCAR and the track will look at the films, figure out what happened and make improvements to avoid that from happening again. Chicken Little is wrong again. AHEM! NO ONE DIED! Chicken Little? I'm not saying NASCAR's sky is falling. For me, this is about whether more needs to be done to protect the fans. I cannot understand why anyone would think that is not a good idea. I do not understand why the mere mention of safety makes some fans bristle with contempt. "No one died"... Is that the measure of safety? |
THAT YOU BY INFERENCE WERE TRYING TO PERPETUATE.
Oops on Caps Lock, but I left them there because it was worth shouting
after all.
CALLATE!
(look it up)
#27
| |||
| |||
|
|
On May 8, 9:18*pm, A. Jones <ajo... (AT) intrtek (DOT) com> wrote: On Fri, 8 May 2009 19:18:23 -0700 (PDT), DAVe <smalleys... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote: On May 8, 8:01*pm, A. Jones <ajo... (AT) intrtek (DOT) com> wrote: On Fri, 08 May 2009 19:02:35 -0400, TS02_05champ tonystewart02_05ch... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: Electrician wrote: The babbling moron Joy once again demonstrates he knows absolutely nothing about NASCAR nor has an independent thought other than what NASCAR tells him to say. The debris that flew into the crowd when Edwards hit the fence was apparent to anyone watching the broadcast. You can apologize now. Mike Joy just said that he misspoke and meant that no *large* debris flew into the crowd. That there is always gonna be *smaller* debris that flies into the crowd with an accident like that, but the fence did it's job. Please define the fence's job. If it is supposed to protect the fans from injury, it failed. Au Contraire. The car stayed on the fence side of the track and the car and the fence itself did not hit the fans. Yes some shrapnel got into a few fans for relative minor injuries, the broken jaw being the only seemingly serious one. So, NASCAR and the track will look at the films, figure out what happened and make improvements to avoid that from happening again. Chicken Little is wrong again. AHEM! NO ONE DIED! Chicken Little? I'm not saying NASCAR's sky is falling. For me, this is about whether more needs to be done to protect the fans. I cannot understand why anyone would think that is not a good idea. I do not understand why the mere mention of safety makes some fans bristle with contempt. "No one died"... Is that the measure of safety? THAT WAS THE CHICKEN LITTLE ARGUMENT THROWN OUT BY COUSIN CARL AND THAT YOU BY INFERENCE WERE TRYING TO PERPETUATE. Oops on Caps Lock, but I left them there because it was worth shouting after all. CALLATE! (look it up) |
don't understand how anyone could be against any effort to improve
safety.
"Yeah man!, pass me another beer and a few flying pieces of fencing."
"Woohoo!, give me a broken jaw and some lifetime facial scars."
#28
| |||
| |||
|
|
Again, I don't understand |
Finally got something right.
Watch out; that battery in your TV remote might ooze or even explode!
#29
| |||
| |||
|
|
On May 8, 11:00*pm, A. Jones <ajo... (AT) intrtek (DOT) com> wrote: Again, I don't understand Aha! Finally got something right. Watch out; that battery in your TV remote might ooze or even explode! |
#30
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 8 May 2009 23:10:20 -0700 (PDT), DAVe <smalleys... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote: On May 8, 11:00*pm, A. Jones <ajo... (AT) intrtek (DOT) com> wrote: Again, I don't understand Aha! Finally got something right. Watch out; that battery in your TV remote might ooze or even explode! Pulleeze, you must do better... |
There is a higher statistical chance of your battery from your remote
doing damage to your person than to get hit by flying debris at a
NASCAR event.
Get it now moron?
Bye!
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.