![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
Rick wrote: honest with us. "Us"? There is nothing more pathetic than someone who is arrogant enough to assert that they speak for an entire group of people. |
|
I would say that the less robotic drivers are Harvick, Stewart, Waltrip, Edwards, McMurry, Sadler, and Kyle Busch to name a few. I like Harvick, Stewart, Waltrip, McMurray and both Buschs. I don't like Edwards because he is just as vanilla as Gordon is. Edwards has that back-flip thing plus a smoke'n-hot mom |
|
5. You don't like boring, vanilla douchebags. |
|
They have good cars, I will give them that. Give everyone equal cars and they don't win a race this year. Give everyone equal cars, and Stewart, Harvick and Hamlin finish 1-2-3 in every race this year. |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
RickyBobby wrote: "Thomas" <wharry (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:f30har$vqv$1 (AT) news04 (DOT) infoave.net... RickyBobby wrote: "Thomas" <wharry (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:f30ev8$tgb$1 (AT) news04 (DOT) infoave.net... Rick wrote: On May 21, 8:20 pm, Thomas <wha... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: I can't stand Jeff Gordon or Jimmie Johnson. Not because of where they are from, or even that they win so much (although I am convinced that there is some rule bending going on). It's because they are boring. I'll admit that JJ and JG are very homogenized but that's what sponsors are looking for. Guys that can drive and keep their noses clean. However, I don't think you're being completely honest with us. "Us"? There is nothing more pathetic than someone who is arrogant enough to assert that they speak for an entire group of people. There are plenty of boring drivers that you "can stand". How about Terry and Bobby Labonte, Don't like either of them. Denny Hamlin, Whines after every race because he's not winning. Love him. Casey Kahne, Made all sorts of remarks about Stremme being "fat," then when given a chance to backpedal on NASCARNow, he kicked Stremme a few more times. I am not to where I like him yet, but he gained a lot of points in my eyes. and Matt Kenseth just to get started. Can't stand him. I would say that the less robotic drivers are Harvick, Stewart, Waltrip, Edwards, McMurry, Sadler, and Kyle Busch to name a few. I like Harvick, Stewart, Waltrip, McMurray and both Buschs. I don't like Edwards because he is just as vanilla as Gordon is. Sadler is just a piker. I don't have opinions of career Busch guys, and Sadler is no better than they are. You hate JJ and JG if: 1. You hate Hendrick 2. You hate California 3. Their voices are too high 4. All of the above plus they win too much 5. You don't like boring, vanilla douchebags. Given decent equipment, those two can drive. You have to admit that! They have good cars, I will give them that. Give everyone equal cars and they don't win a race this year. Give everyone equal cars, and Stewart, Harvick and Hamlin finish 1-2-3 in every race this year. -Thomas Thomas, you are out of your little mind if you think that Jeff Gordon won 78 races and four Championships just by the luck of the draw. I didn't say anything about luck, bud. He won everything that there is out there to be won because he is the best driver of his time. He's the winningest driver of his time. Way better than Dale Earnhardt. Enh. I know you're trolling for a response, but I never really cared for Earnhardt. Both of them are intensely overrated. Way better than Tony Stewart. Not even close. Tony Stewart is the best driver in the modern era of motorsports. Schumaker is a moderately close 2nd. You might be able to make a case for Gordon at #3, but it would be spotty at best. Way better than everyone. Jeff Gordon is the best there ever was and the best there ever will be. Heh. Whatever you say, kiddo. I do not care about Formula One driving. F1 is all electronics and politics and the cars never pass each other after the first two laps. Tony Stewart seems to be winless so far just as the recent hot shoes Ryan Newman and Dale Earnhardt,Jr. In the stick and ball leagues they have about thirty teams and only one of them wins. At the glorious Indianapolis 500 they have 33 entrants and only one of them wins. But in NASCAR they have 43 entrants which makes it the hardest major sport in which to win. And Jeff Gordon has won more often and quicker than anyone who ever was or every will be. Facts is facts. That doesn't make him the best driver. That makes him the driver in the best situation. -Thomas |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
They have good cars, I will give them that. Give everyone equal cars and they don't win a race this year. Give everyone equal cars, and Stewart, Harvick and Hamlin finish 1-2-3 in every race this year. -Thomas |
#14
| ||||||
| ||||||
|
|
On May 22, 11:12 pm, Thomas <wha... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: Rick wrote: I would say that the less robotic drivers are Harvick, Stewart, Waltrip, Edwards, McMurry, Sadler, and Kyle Busch to name a few. I like Harvick, Stewart, Waltrip, McMurray and both Buschs. I don't like Edwards because he is just as vanilla as Gordon is. Edwards has that back-flip thing |
|
plus a smoke'n-hot mom which I thought would remove him from the "vaniila" group. |
|
5. You don't like boring, vanilla douchebags. I thought the only reason you didn't like them was because they are boring. Explain why they are douchebags to "us". |
|
They have good cars, I will give them that. Give everyone equal cars and they don't win a race this year. Give everyone equal cars, and Stewart, Harvick and Hamlin finish 1-2-3 in every race this year. It can be argued that the JGR and RCR teams have equipment every bit as good as HMS. |
|
the JGR COT's have lead more laps than the HMS COTs, they just haven't won (for various reasons). |
|
Harvick had a fast car at Daytona and Burton is up there every week. |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Thomas" <wharry (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:f30ev8$tgb$1 (AT) news04 (DOT) infoave.net... snip They have good cars, I will give them that. Give everyone equal cars and they don't win a race this year. Give everyone equal cars, and Stewart, Harvick and Hamlin finish 1-2-3 in every race this year. -Thomas Harvick? um, yeah. He's good, but top 3? I don't think so. IMO, given equal equipment, either Stewart or Kenseth would win every week. Kenseth would win when Stewart has his head up his ass. Otherwise, he finishes second to Tony. |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
armpit wrote: "Thomas" <wharry (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:f30ev8$tgb$1 (AT) news04 (DOT) infoave.net... snip They have good cars, I will give them that. Give everyone equal cars and they don't win a race this year. Give everyone equal cars, and Stewart, Harvick and Hamlin finish 1-2-3 in every race this year. -Thomas Harvick? um, yeah. He's good, but top 3? I don't think so. IMO, given equal equipment, either Stewart or Kenseth would win every week. Kenseth would win when Stewart has his head up his ass. Otherwise, he finishes second to Tony. I think you underrate Hamlin and Hill. -Thomas |
#17
| |||||
| |||||
|
|
I don't find his mom attractive, and having an attractive mother doesn't make you any less of a stain. For a women in the 45-55 age range she's not bad. |
|
5. You don't like boring, vanilla douchebags. I thought the only reason you didn't like them was because they are boring. Explain why they are douchebags to "us". Gordon is a douche. |
|
They don't. |
|
the JGR COT's have lead more laps than the HMS COTs, they just haven't won (for various reasons). Their cars aren't as good. In Hamlin's case, his pit crew screwed him a couple times. In Tony's case, he got wrecked by Johnny Hill and Dipshit Gilliland. But if they had Hendrick-quality cars, that wouldn't have happened. Gilliland wouldn't have been able to wreck Tony, because he wouldn't have been able to get around Hamlin and Harvick at the #2 and #3 spots, much less get close enough to Tony to wreck him. |
|
Yep, sometimes the Hendrick team doesn't get their cars set up quite as well as at other times. Doesn't change the fact that the car is the reason why Gordon and Johnson win. |
#18
| |||||
| |||||
|
|
I don't find his mom attractive, and having an attractive mother doesn't make you any less of a stain. For a women in the 45-55 age range she's not bad. |
|
5. You don't like boring, vanilla douchebags. I thought the only reason you didn't like them was because they are boring. Explain why they are douchebags to "us". Gordon is a douche. |
|
They don't. |
|
the JGR COT's have lead more laps than the HMS COTs, they just haven't won (for various reasons). Their cars aren't as good. In Hamlin's case, his pit crew screwed him a couple times. In Tony's case, he got wrecked by Johnny Hill and Dipshit Gilliland. But if they had Hendrick-quality cars, that wouldn't have happened. Gilliland wouldn't have been able to wreck Tony, because he wouldn't have been able to get around Hamlin and Harvick at the #2 and #3 spots, much less get close enough to Tony to wreck him. |
|
Yep, sometimes the Hendrick team doesn't get their cars set up quite as well as at other times. Doesn't change the fact that the car is the reason why Gordon and Johnson win. |
#19
| |||||
| |||||
|
|
I don't find his mom attractive, and having an attractive mother doesn't make you any less of a stain. For a women in the 45-55 age range she's not bad. |
|
5. You don't like boring, vanilla douchebags. I thought the only reason you didn't like them was because they are boring. Explain why they are douchebags to "us". Gordon is a douche. |
|
They don't. |
|
the JGR COT's have lead more laps than the HMS COTs, they just haven't won (for various reasons). Their cars aren't as good. In Hamlin's case, his pit crew screwed him a couple times. In Tony's case, he got wrecked by Johnny Hill and Dipshit Gilliland. But if they had Hendrick-quality cars, that wouldn't have happened. Gilliland wouldn't have been able to wreck Tony, because he wouldn't have been able to get around Hamlin and Harvick at the #2 and #3 spots, much less get close enough to Tony to wreck him. |
|
Yep, sometimes the Hendrick team doesn't get their cars set up quite as well as at other times. Doesn't change the fact that the car is the reason why Gordon and Johnson win. |
#20
| |||||
| |||||
|
|
I don't find his mom attractive, and having an attractive mother doesn't make you any less of a stain. For a women in the 45-55 age range she's not bad. |
|
5. You don't like boring, vanilla douchebags. I thought the only reason you didn't like them was because they are boring. Explain why they are douchebags to "us". Gordon is a douche. |
|
They don't. |
|
the JGR COT's have lead more laps than the HMS COTs, they just haven't won (for various reasons). Their cars aren't as good. In Hamlin's case, his pit crew screwed him a couple times. In Tony's case, he got wrecked by Johnny Hill and Dipshit Gilliland. But if they had Hendrick-quality cars, that wouldn't have happened. Gilliland wouldn't have been able to wreck Tony, because he wouldn't have been able to get around Hamlin and Harvick at the #2 and #3 spots, much less get close enough to Tony to wreck him. |
|
Yep, sometimes the Hendrick team doesn't get their cars set up quite as well as at other times. Doesn't change the fact that the car is the reason why Gordon and Johnson win. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |