no brakes

#1

Those hendrick cars are so unreliable, right?

#2

doubleu wrote:

Quote:

Those hendrick cars are so unreliable, right?

He lost his brakes, what's your point?

#3

On Aug 10, 2:13*pm, TS02_05champ <tonystewart02_05ch... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com>
wrote:

Quote:

doubleu wrote:
Those hendrick cars are so unreliable, right?

He lost his brakes, what's your point?

Obviously he lost his brakes because he is not a good driver!

#4

bilbravo wrote:

Quote:

On Aug 10, 2:13 pm, TS02_05champ <tonystewart02_05ch... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com
wrote:
doubleu wrote:
Those hendrick cars are so unreliable, right?
He lost his brakes, what's your point?

Obviously he lost his brakes because he is not a good driver!

Really. Did you inspect the brakes to see why they failed?

#5

On Aug 10, 2:31*pm, TS02_05champ <tonystewart02_05ch... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com>
wrote:

Quote:

bilbravo wrote:
On Aug 10, 2:13 pm, TS02_05champ <tonystewart02_05ch... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com
wrote:
doubleu wrote:
Those hendrick cars are so unreliable, right?
He lost his brakes, what's your point?

Obviously he lost his brakes because he is not a good driver!

Really. Did you inspect the brakes to see why they failed?

I debated putting a <snicker> or <sarcasm> tag in my post but thought
my reputation preceded me (I've been called "one of the biggest
'junyer' apologists" before)

#6

In article bilbravo <bilbravo (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:

I debated putting a <snicker> or <sarcasm> tag in my post

You really need to..
There are a lot of people that don't get sarcasm....
Personally, I've never used a smiley or snicker tag,
and have been misunderstood plenty.
Not that it's a big deal, you just feel bad for people
that can't see through it.

#7

Chuck Steak wrote:

Quote:

In article bilbravo <bilbravo (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

I debated putting a <snicker> or <sarcasm> tag in my post

You really need to..
There are a lot of people that don't get sarcasm....
Personally, I've never used a smiley or snicker tag,
and have been misunderstood plenty.
Not that it's a big deal, you just feel bad for people
that can't see through it.

Give me a break. There are some many Jr bashers in this group I can't
keep up with all of them. That comment is usually a serious comment when
it comes to DEJ.

#8

In article TS02_05champ <tonystewart02_05champ (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:

Chuck Steak wrote:
In article bilbravo <bilbravo (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

I debated putting a <snicker> or <sarcasm> tag in my post

You really need to..
There are a lot of people that don't get sarcasm....
Personally, I've never used a smiley or snicker tag,
and have been misunderstood plenty.
Not that it's a big deal, you just feel bad for people
that can't see through it.

Give me a break. There are some many Jr bashers in this group I can't
keep up with all of them. That comment is usually a serious comment when
it comes to DEJ.

Lighten up a tad, amigo...
Did you see your name in my post?
Even you should have noticed by now that there are some
that don't see it.
Every post I, or others write, isn't always about you...
The phrase "a lot of people" doesn't mean "all" the people...

#9

Chuck Steak wrote:

Quote:

In article TS02_05champ <tonystewart02_05champ (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:
Chuck Steak wrote:
In article bilbravo <bilbravo (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

I debated putting a <snicker> or <sarcasm> tag in my post
You really need to..
There are a lot of people that don't get sarcasm....
Personally, I've never used a smiley or snicker tag,
and have been misunderstood plenty.
Not that it's a big deal, you just feel bad for people
that can't see through it.
Give me a break. There are some many Jr bashers in this group I can't
keep up with all of them. That comment is usually a serious comment when
it comes to DEJ.

Lighten up a tad, amigo...

Consider me lightened.