AutosTalk Forums  

Preferential Treatment In NASCAR

Nascar NASCAR and other professional stock car racing (rec.autos.sport.nascar)


Discuss Preferential Treatment In NASCAR in the Nascar forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old   
Rod Gramlich
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Preferential Treatment In NASCAR - 05-17-2007 , 11:33 AM







"Frank from Deeetroit" <dadurweird (AT) voyager (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:

Lower RPM's permit the coolant to remain in the radiator for a longer
period of time. Longer amount of time spent in the radiator = more
opportunity to cool the fluid.
Conversely, ...... longer amount of time in radiator also translates to
longer amount of time in the engine (for the volume that isn't in the rad)
....... and it is THAT heat gradient (i.e. engine metal to coolant) that
matters.

Bottom line is that Jeff's car very likely had a partially plugged rad (wrt
air flow), and that 'exchange' (i.e. hot fluid to coils of the exchanger)
relied on moving more air through the available open fins, ... and the
trade_off was that more speed with the high RPMs was more optimal and
effective than low speed and low RPM.


Quote:




Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old   
Gordon
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Preferential Treatment In NASCAR - 05-17-2007 , 12:49 PM








Frank from Deeetroit wrote:
Quote:
"Mike/Speeed" <speeedracerREMOVE24 (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote in message


Lower RPM's permit the coolant to remain in the radiator for a longer period
of time. Longer amount of time spent in the radiator = more opportunity to
cool the fluid.


However the fluid then says in the heat source longer and that negates
the cool water as you then introduce hotter water back into the
radiator...you can't have it both ways...

The ability to cool comes from the ability to remove heat, more volume =
greater ability of heat reduction...cool water not circulating does not
reduce heat. the fluid needs to circulate to remove heat. Higher RPM =
more volume.


Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old   
Chuck Steak
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Preferential Treatment In NASCAR - 05-17-2007 , 01:08 PM



In article "Frank from Deeetroit" <dadurweird (AT) voyager (DOT) net> wrote:

Quote:
Lower RPM's permit the coolant to remain in the radiator for a longer period
of time. Longer amount of time spent in the radiator = more opportunity to
cool the fluid.
Only if there is adequate air flow, to take the heat away.... (turn on fan)
Race cars generally run cooler, when they are going faster..(turn fan off)


Dan
****************************************
I'm going to stop putting things off.
Starting tomorrow.


Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old   
Crusader
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Preferential Treatment In NASCAR - 05-17-2007 , 01:19 PM



"SimRacer" <NOsimracer68 (AT) yahoo (DOT) comSPAM> wrote

Quote:
On Wed, 16 May 2007 17:32:08 -0400, "Crusader" <cru357 (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net
wrote:
The Frontstretch: Is There Really Preferential Treatment In NASCAR?
CRUsnip

By the by Cru, did you see the Speed TV Wind Tunnel deal on DES and JG
last night? Pretty good guest lineup, lots of facts put out about the
2 that I'm sure the bulk of the 0-5-10 year NASCAR fans likely didn't
know. Made them both look pretty good overall. So much so that by the
end of the program, I was asking myself if this had an underlying
motive like getting folks to stop throwing stuff at JG since he and DE
got along so well...lol No, DeSpain said it was planned to have
happened while they were tied with wins and Jeff ruined it by winning
again (and again) before it could go off as planned...

I was sort of put off by RH saying that JG wasn't handed the "silver
spoon" ride and that the team was new and it was a chore to build it
up...Hendrick was strong when he got there, and he earned the ride
IMO, but it wasn't your basic startup-from-nothing team like RH was
poor mouthing it to be last night...Just like the 11 team wasn't "that
bad" when Hamlin showed up...They just hadn't had the chance to shine
with talent-challenged guys like Leffler driving it theretofore. I
mean I can see RH sticking up for/defending his "Wonderboy", but he
started to lay it on a little thick there for a while. At least Dave
got Rick to admit that DES had won HMS its very first NASCAR (Busch)
race...and it was saddening somewhat to hear Tim Richmond mentioned
and then promptly skirted right around without much ado. A tragic
story and figure indeed, but Richmond was destined to be great, just
like Davey Allison. History is what it is, and continually sweeping it
under the rug doesn't do it or us justice IMHO.
Oh yeah is saw it & even emailed them with stats (what else?),
altho none of them got on the show.

I thot Hendrick made a pretty good point about the #24 being
a startup team, especially considering Evernham was as new to Cup
as JG. THE point i fergot about that Rick made was that the
Defending Champ got either the 1st pit stall (or was it 1st choice?)
for the entire following season. IMO that was a huge advantage!
Haven't found any details on that Rule yet--Wondering how many seasons
it was in effect & especially did it benefit DE greatly, moderately?
CRU




Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old   
\\78\\
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Preferential Treatment In NASCAR is alive and well - 05-17-2007 , 01:46 PM




"Anthony Fremont" <anyone (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Crusader wrote:
The Frontstretch: Is There Really Preferential Treatment In NASCAR?
Full Throttle · Mike Neff · Tuesday May 15, 2007
http://www.frontstretch.com/mneff/8896/

Well, NASCAR threw two different cautions during that final segment
of the race which put Gordon at a much greater risk of his car
blowing up. Saying that he was given preferential treatment during
the entire event is simply inaccurate.

Of course they didn't throw one when DH was hollering on his radio about
all the debris on the track. Oh yeah, he likely would have passed JG if
they'd have done that. DHs car was faster and hadn't been blowing steam
for more than 100 laps, so it was almost a sure thing he'd blow by JG. Of
course the official explanation is that the debris wasn't in the driving
groove, but GB said that a car ran over some and threw it up in the air so
that seems to contradict the official story.

OTOH, a few weeks ago they threw a caution for debris that wasn't anywhere
near the driving area of the track (it was wayyyyyy outside the yellow
line). Track Wrasslin' is what it's becoming......now if someone would
just hit JG with a chair, they might have something I'd enjoy seeing.....
;-)
Someone hit Jr. with a "chair"..... (penalty wise)




Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old   
Mark
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Preferential Treatment In NASCAR - 05-17-2007 , 01:53 PM



On May 17, 1:19 pm, "Crusader" <cru... (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net> wrote:
Quote:
"SimRacer" <NOsimrace... (AT) yahoo (DOT) comSPAM> wrote in message

news:n1vo435fa362ug09kci9qnaguluffb89h8 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...



On Wed, 16 May 2007 17:32:08 -0400, "Crusader" <cru... (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net
wrote:
The Frontstretch: Is There Really Preferential Treatment In NASCAR?
CRUsnip

By the by Cru, did you see the Speed TV Wind Tunnel deal on DES and JG
last night? Pretty good guest lineup, lots of facts put out about the
2 that I'm sure the bulk of the 0-5-10 year NASCAR fans likely didn't
know. Made them both look pretty good overall. So much so that by the
end of the program, I was asking myself if this had an underlying
motive like getting folks to stop throwing stuff at JG since he and DE
got along so well...lol No, DeSpain said it was planned to have
happened while they were tied with wins and Jeff ruined it by winning
again (and again) before it could go off as planned...

I was sort of put off by RH saying that JG wasn't handed the "silver
spoon" ride and that the team was new and it was a chore to build it
up...Hendrick was strong when he got there, and he earned the ride
IMO, but it wasn't your basic startup-from-nothing team like RH was
poor mouthing it to be last night...Just like the 11 team wasn't "that
bad" when Hamlin showed up...They just hadn't had the chance to shine
with talent-challenged guys like Leffler driving it theretofore. I
mean I can see RH sticking up for/defending his "Wonderboy", but he
started to lay it on a little thick there for a while. At least Dave
got Rick to admit that DES had won HMS its very first NASCAR (Busch)
race...and it was saddening somewhat to hear Tim Richmond mentioned
and then promptly skirted right around without much ado. A tragic
story and figure indeed, but Richmond was destined to be great, just
like Davey Allison. History is what it is, and continually sweeping it
under the rug doesn't do it or us justice IMHO.

Oh yeah is saw it & even emailed them with stats (what else?),
altho none of them got on the show.

I thot Hendrick made a pretty good point about the #24 being
a startup team, especially considering Evernham was as new to Cup
as JG. THE point i fergot about that Rick made was that the
Defending Champ got either the 1st pit stall (or was it 1st choice?)
for the entire following season. IMO that was a huge advantage!
Haven't found any details on that Rule yet--Wondering how many seasons
it was in effect & especially did it benefit DE greatly, moderately?
CRU

That is the way he wanted to spin it, but adding a car to an existing
sucessful team is not a start up team. The structure was in place.
The resources were in place. The buildings and equipment were likely
in place or easy enough to add. Its always easier to add, than to
create. Notebooks were available for Ray to cruise through. New car
is not new team. Granted they had to work to make the most of the
opportunity, but it was nothing like a new team. MWR is a new team.
Jeff faced none of those challenges. The team was a winning team.
Silver spoon? Probably not fair, but Jeff did have some very big
advantages most of the day didn't. First he had the backing of
parents that could afford and support him his racing quest. Even USAC
isn't cheap. Helping to put those deals together or paying for them
outright with a kid that young wasn't easy, nor was it the typical
method of the time to get into Nascar. Jeff never drove bad
equipment. Prior to Jeff a driver would have to prove themselves at
the top level in a car other than one of the top teams. To put it in
todays lingo, you would have had to done well in the Bam car before
you would have had the chance to get a ride with Rousch, Childress,
Gibbs or Hendrick. Jeff has driven some ill handling cars, but he
never drove a bad race car. There is a difference. Drivers prior
to Jeff usually spent a part of their carreer in bad race cars with
little if any chance to win.

Silver spoon isn't really fair, but he didn't pay his dues the way
drivers in the past did. Thats not to say it didn't take hard work to
make the most of the opportunity which he did, but his opportunity
opened much much younger than any driver in the history of Nascar. In
the end his win totals will reflect that.

Now Ricks point about the champion getting the pit selection is
valid. Yet that is like comparing the Babe to the Hammer. In the
Babe's time a Homer could bounce over the fence, but if a fly went out
of the park it had to hit fair to be a home run. The Hammer could
have a fly that left the park fair but hook foul afterwards count, but
bouncers were doubles. How would it have effected the totals? Who
knows? Different times. Just both were following the rules of the
day, they were just different.



Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old   
Mark
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Preferential Treatment In NASCAR - 05-17-2007 , 01:57 PM




Quote:
I thot Hendrick made a pretty good point about the #24 being
a startup team, especially considering Evernham was as new to Cup
as JG. THE point i fergot about that Rick made was that the
Defending Champ got either the 1st pit stall (or was it 1st choice?)
for the entire following season. IMO that was a huge advantage!
Haven't found any details on that Rule yet--Wondering how many seasons
it was in effect & especially did it benefit DE greatly, moderately?
CRU

That is the way he wanted to spin it, but adding a car to an existing
sucessful team is not a start up team. The structure was in place.
The resources were in place. The buildings and equipment were likely
in place or easy enough to add. Its always easier to add, than to
create. Notebooks were available for Ray to cruise through. New car
is not new team. Granted they had to work to make the most of the
opportunity, but it was nothing like a new team. MWR is a new team.
Jeff faced none of those challenges. The team was a winning team.
Silver spoon? Probably not fair, but Jeff did have some very big
advantages most of the day didn't. First he had the backing of
parents that could afford and support him his racing quest. Even USAC
isn't cheap. Helping to put those deals together or paying for them
outright with a kid that young wasn't easy, nor was it the typical
method of the time to get into Nascar. Jeff never drove bad
equipment. Prior to Jeff a driver would have to prove themselves at
the top level in a car other than one of the top teams. To put it in
todays lingo, you would have had to done well in the Bam car before
you would have had the chance to get a ride with Rousch, Childress,
Gibbs or Hendrick. Jeff has driven some ill handling cars, but he
never drove a bad race car. There is a difference. Drivers prior
to Jeff usually spent a part of their carreer in bad race cars with
little if any chance to win.

Silver spoon isn't really fair, but he didn't pay his dues the way
drivers in the past did. Thats not to say it didn't take hard work to
make the most of the opportunity which he did, but his opportunity
opened much much younger than any driver in the history of Nascar. In
the end his win totals will reflect that.

Now Ricks point about the champion getting the pit selection is
valid. Yet that is like comparing the Babe to the Hammer. In the
Babe's time a Homer could bounce over the fence, but if a fly went out
of the park it had to hit fair to be a home run. The Hammer could
have a fly that left the park fair but hook foul afterwards count, but
bouncers were doubles. How would it have effected the totals? Who
knows? Different times. Just both were following the rules of the
day, they were just different.



Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old   
\\78\\
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Preferential Treatment In NASCAR - 05-17-2007 , 01:57 PM




"Frank from Deeetroit" <dadurweird (AT) voyager (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
"Mike/Speeed" <speeedracerREMOVE24 (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:RfqdncVBmb7sW9bbnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com...

"Frank from Deeetroit" <dadurweird (AT) voyager (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:V7SdndTHM7bWO9bbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com...

"MW" <joe (AT) microsoft (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:jBM2i.20895$YL5.15567 (AT) newssvr29 (DOT) news.prodigy.net...

"deadguy3" <deadguy3 (AT) upstairs (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1hkgvmzevox37$.1n2uuwh12yr84$.dlg (AT) 40tude (DOT) net...
On Wed, 16 May 2007 17:32:08 -0400,
Crusader wrote:

The Frontstretch: Is There Really Preferential Treatment In NASCAR?
Full Throttle · Mike Neff · Tuesday May 15, 2007
http://www.frontstretch.com/mneff/8896/

Well, NASCAR threw two different cautions during that final segment
of the race which put Gordon at a much greater risk of his car
blowing
up.
Saying that he was given preferential treatment during the entire
event
is
simply inaccurate.

wrong, putting around @50mph @ part
throttle cools the engine. so they
were actually helping him.

.... those engines are designed to get more air at higher speeds.
Slower
speeds = less air, more retained heat = blown engine. Some one correct
me if
I'm wrong?

MW



Engine generates less heat at a lower speed which lessons the burden on
the cooling system.

That would only be the case if the car had a system installed to send
cool air through the already clogged radiator at slow speeds, BUT, Cup
cars have no radiator fans, SO, cautions will cause an already
overheating engine to overheat further.
HTH


Lower RPM's permit the coolant to remain in the radiator for a longer
period of time. Longer amount of time spent in the radiator = more
opportunity to cool the fluid.
What fluid?
JG had lost at least half of it in the last 100 laps.
.......Hence the steaming overflow.




Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old   
George Mooth
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Preferential Treatment In NASCAR - 05-17-2007 , 03:02 PM




Quote:
Engine generates less heat at a lower speed which lessons the burden on
the cooling system.

That would only be the case if the car had a system installed to send cool
air through the already clogged radiator at slow speeds, BUT, Cup cars
have no radiator fans, SO, cautions will cause an already overheating
engine to overheat further.
HTH


Lower RPM's permit the coolant to remain in the radiator for a longer period
of time. Longer amount of time spent in the radiator = more opportunity to
cool the fluid.
Heat builds up in the engine compartment too at low speeds. Higher
speeds give more air flow around the engine block and all engine
compartment components. Thus the car stays cooler at high speed than
at low speed. The water goes through the radiator at the same speed no
matter how fast the car is going. It is pumped with an electric pump
which pumps the same all the time. So I'm sure Jeff was sweating out
the caution laps.


Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old   
Rod Gramlich
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Preferential Treatment In NASCAR - 05-17-2007 , 03:29 PM




"George Mooth" <gmoothdoh (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:

at low speed. The water goes through the radiator at the same speed no
matter how fast the car is going. It is pumped with an electric pump
which pumps the same all the time.
Interesting ............. I thought it was mechanical



So I'm sure Jeff was sweating out
Quote:
the caution laps.



Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.