AutosTalk Forums  

Re: FATBOY STEWART AND HER FANS SUCK

Nascar NASCAR and other professional stock car racing (rec.autos.sport.nascar)


Discuss Re: FATBOY STEWART AND HER FANS SUCK in the Nascar forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Ron
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: FATBOY STEWART AND HER FANS SUCK - 02-26-2006 , 08:10 PM






How bout you go suck your sisters cock.......hmmmmm?


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Shades
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: FATBOY STEWART AND HER FANS SUCK - 02-26-2006 , 09:09 PM







"20sucksass" <anon (AT) comments (DOT) header> wrote

Quote:
It's a great day any day when they interview fatboy grease and the race
is still going on. Amazing what the field can do when you get
BumperCarTony out of the race. She sucks and so do her fans.

I agree fuck the #20
good day !of racin




Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Ron
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: FATBOY STEWART AND HER FANS SUCK - 02-27-2006 , 03:45 PM




Newsgroup Management wrote:
Quote:
In article <1141002603.737042.183110 (AT) p10g2000cwp (DOT) googlegroups.com
"Ron" <BigELilE05 (AT) msn (DOT) com> wrote:

Sent to MSN abuse control from the following address:
LMFAO!

Get a life you fucking troll.

BTW, Do you really think that ANY ISP wants to lose a customer (which =
money) over words written in a newsgroup?

Quote:
Path: master.readnews.com!198.186.190.247.MISMATCH!news-
out.readnews.com!news-
xxxfer.readnews.com!postnews.google.com!p10g2000cw p.googlegroups.com!not-
for-mail
From: "Ron" <BigELilE05 (AT) msn (DOT) com
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.nascar
Subject: Re: FATBOY STEWART AND HER FANS SUCK
Date: 26 Feb 2006 17:10:03 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 2
Message-ID: <1141002603.737042.183110 (AT) p10g2000cwp (DOT) googlegroups.com
References: <M7BT6DQ238774.8364236111 (AT) twistycreek (DOT) com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.171.12.38
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1141002617 13183 127.0.0.1 (27 Feb 2006
01:10:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse (AT) google (DOT) com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 01:10:17 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <M7BT6DQ238774.8364236111 (AT) twistycreek (DOT) com
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT
5.0),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse (AT) google (DOT) com
Injection-Info: p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com; posting-host=4.171.12.38;
posting-account=8rbZTg0AAADs43JJddOdKQQEcL04tvgu
Xref: rec.autos.sport.nascar:33960

How bout you go suck your sisters cock.......hmmmmm?


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Deus vult
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: FATBOY STEWART AND HER FANS SUCK - 02-27-2006 , 04:10 PM



Newsgroup Management wrote:
Quote:
Sent to MSN abuse control from the following address:
Not that I'm a fan of vulgar language, but I'm LOL.

This is America 2006 where Oprah asked her self-described slutty
female guest if men "ejaculated" in her face on daytime TV (see
drudgereport.com for source).


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
Ron
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: FATBOY STEWART AND HER FANS SUCK - 02-27-2006 , 06:28 PM




Newsgroup Management uh huh wrote:
Quote:
In article <dtvu9d$jc6$1 (AT) flapjack (DOT) cray.com
Deus vult <pearl (AT) cray (DOT) com> wrote:

Just wanted to see how much of a tug on the chain was needed to get a few
dopes to respond. Didn't take much for these losers. now look who's
ROTFLMAO
Just goes to show that you are in fact, a troll and sock puppet.

A good troll/sockpuppet covers his/her tracks.



Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
Ron
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: FATBOY STEWART AND HER FANS SUCK - 02-28-2006 , 09:18 AM




Ron wrote:
Quote:
In article <1141082915.160991.310050 (AT) z34g2000cwc (DOT) googlegroups.com
"Ron" <BigELilE05 (AT) msn (DOT) com> wrote:

LOL. Troll and sock puppet. You REALLY are up on all the current lingo,
or at least what was used about 5 years ago. So you're using MSN that
came with your computer? No idea about browsers and ng programs? That's
ok. You'll learn just as soon as someone reads the manuals to you. For
now, try not to embarrass yourself too much. Your posts, since you don't
know any better, will follow you archivally to the grave, newbie. (now
that's not a reall current term either but in light of how you talk, I
thought I'd use it so you know what I'm talking about.)
Now try this one.........PLONK
ba bye.

Unlike YOU, I'm not worried about what I write, Mr TwistyCreek,
X-No-Archive:yes.

BTW, You're about 12yrs behind, Twisty.

" While it originated in the newsgroup talk.bizarre, this term (usually
written "*plonk*") is now (1994) widespread on Usenet as a form of
public ridicule."

You got me good! LMAO!



Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.