AutosTalk Forums  

Re: Jimmie Johnson killed NASCAR

Nascar NASCAR and other professional stock car racing (rec.autos.sport.nascar)


Discuss Re: Jimmie Johnson killed NASCAR in the Nascar forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
Nancy2
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Jimmie Johnson killed NASCAR - 10-19-2009 , 04:29 PM






On Oct 19, 2:58*pm, Chuck_St... (AT) nospam (DOT) com (Chuck Steak) wrote:
Quote:
In article Nancy2 <nancy-doo... (AT) uiowa (DOT) edu> wrote:

It may look like this this year, but in years past, in both N'wide and
Truck, there have been plenty of close battles right up to the last
race (without any stupid "Chase"). *And I'm sure there will be again.

N.

Like in 2007 where going into the last race
2nd place Reutimann was only 571 points behind
Or 2006 where Carl Edwards was only 844 points behind leader Kevin Harvick.
and Boyer *was in third a mere 940 points back.
Or 2004 where Kyle Busch trailed by only 230 with one to go.
And Biffle was only 605 back in third.

2008 was closer, in all fairness.
With one to go Boyer was only 56 in front of Carl Edwards,
but 353 ahead of third place Jason Leffler.

I know you don't care for the chase, Nance,
but let's not say there were 'plenty' of good title races 'without' the chase.
I thought there was a truck race or two where the points difference
going into the last race was less than 20 points or something like
that. Mayhap I made it up. ;-) How about the year that Martin lost
in Cup, by 2 points?

N.

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
Chuck Steak
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Jimmie Johnson killed NASCAR - 10-19-2009 , 06:29 PM






In article Nancy2 <nancy-dooley (AT) uiowa (DOT) edu> wrote:

Quote:
I thought there was a truck race or two where the points difference
going into the last race was less than 20 points or something like
that.
I'm sure there was.

Quote:
Mayhap I made it up. ;-) How about the year that Martin lost
in Cup, by 2 points?

N.
(I think it was 26.. in 1990)

How about 2004, Kurt won it by 8, after nearly hitting the
wall with a wheel issue? (the first chase).
But then Alan Kulwicki won it by 10 over Eliott in 1992.

We can find examples to illustrate either position,
however, the chances are much much greater that there
will be a closer battle WITH the chase.
Past championship races bear that out.

Since the chase started, each title could have been won
by as many as 5 guys, going in to the last race.
In the 20 years prior to that, that scenario never occured,
In fact, only half of them was it close to possible for the
second place driver to win.
7 times the winner won by over 200 points, meaning it was a lock
way before the end. 4 times it was over 350.
The highest was 489

Since the chase they have been won by
8, 35, 56, 69, 77.

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old   
TS02_05champ
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Jimmie Johnson killed NASCAR - 10-19-2009 , 07:53 PM



Nancy2 wrote:
Quote:
I thought there was a truck race or two where the points difference
going into the last race was less than 20 points or something like
that. Mayhap I made it up. ;-) How about the year that Martin lost
in Cup, by 2 points?
The last 2 yrs have been close going into the final race.

In '07 Hornaday beat Skinner by 54 points. Skinner had a 29 point lead
going into the last race. I can't recall exactly what it was (I think a
rear wheel fell off and rounded the lug nuts) but Skinner had mechanical
problems that probably cost him the championship.

Last yr, Benson won by 7 points over Hornaday. Benson had a 3 point lead
going into the last race.

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old   
Tom Duwe
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Jimmie Johnson killed NASCAR - 10-19-2009 , 09:44 PM



"Chuck Steak" <chuck_steak (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote


<snip>

Quote:
I don't mind it.
I know.

Quote:
I don't mind seeing the last half dozen races mean something.
Especially the last one.
The fact that the remaining races this year include M'ville and 'dega is the
only thing that **might** make the last races 'mean something'...b'leeve
JJ's got 'em covered.

Again.

--
Tom in Bristol

Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old   
Chuck Steak
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Jimmie Johnson killed NASCAR - 10-19-2009 , 09:53 PM



In article <tomd88SPAMLESS (AT) bvunet (DOT) net> wrote:

Quote:
The fact that the remaining races this year include M'ville and 'dega is the
only thing that **might** make the last races 'mean something'...b'leeve
JJ's got 'em covered.
Where you been?
Long vacation?

Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old   
Mike/Speeed
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Jimmie Johnson killed NASCAR - 10-19-2009 , 10:18 PM



"Chuck Steak" <Chuck_Steak (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
In article Nancy2 <nancy-dooley (AT) uiowa (DOT) edu> wrote:

I thought there was a truck race or two where the points difference
going into the last race was less than 20 points or something like
that.

I'm sure there was.

Mayhap I made it up. ;-) How about the year that Martin lost
in Cup, by 2 points?

N.

(I think it was 26.. in 1990)

How about 2004, Kurt won it by 8, after nearly hitting the
wall with a wheel issue? (the first chase).
But then Alan Kulwicki won it by 10 over Eliott in 1992.

We can find examples to illustrate either position,
however, the chances are much much greater that there
will be a closer battle WITH the chase.
Past championship races bear that out.

Since the chase started, each title could have been won
by as many as 5 guys, going in to the last race.
In the 20 years prior to that, that scenario never occured,
In fact, only half of them was it close to possible for the
second place driver to win.
7 times the winner won by over 200 points, meaning it was a lock
way before the end. 4 times it was over 350.
The highest was 489

Since the chase they have been won by
8, 35, 56, 69, 77.

"Manufactured Drama"...... Isn't it great?

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old   
Chuck Steak
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Jimmie Johnson killed NASCAR - 10-20-2009 , 09:05 AM



In article "Mike/Speeed" <SpeedracerREMOVE24 (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote:

Quote:
"Chuck Steak" <Chuck_Steak (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote in message

We can find examples to illustrate either position,
however, the chances are much much greater that there
will be a closer battle WITH the chase.
Past championship races bear that out.

Since the chase started, each title could have been won
by as many as 5 guys, going in to the last race.
In the 20 years prior to that, that scenario never occured,
In fact, only half of them was it close to possible for the
second place driver to win.
7 times the winner won by over 200 points, meaning it was a lock
way before the end. 4 times it was over 350.
The highest was 489

Since the chase they have been won by
8, 35, 56, 69, 77.


"Manufactured Drama"...... Isn't it great?

whatever.

Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old   
Rod's work news
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Jimmie Johnson killed NASCAR - 10-20-2009 , 10:13 AM



"Mike/Speeed" <SpeedracerREMOVE24 (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
"Chuck Steak" <Chuck_Steak (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:hbip6l$qrj$1 (AT) aioe (DOT) org...
In article Nancy2 <nancy-dooley (AT) uiowa (DOT) edu> wrote:

I thought there was a truck race or two where the points difference
going into the last race was less than 20 points or something like
that.

I'm sure there was.

Mayhap I made it up. ;-) How about the year that Martin lost
in Cup, by 2 points?

N.

(I think it was 26.. in 1990)

How about 2004, Kurt won it by 8, after nearly hitting the
wall with a wheel issue? (the first chase).
But then Alan Kulwicki won it by 10 over Eliott in 1992.

We can find examples to illustrate either position,
however, the chances are much much greater that there
will be a closer battle WITH the chase.
Past championship races bear that out.

Since the chase started, each title could have been won
by as many as 5 guys, going in to the last race.
In the 20 years prior to that, that scenario never occured,
In fact, only half of them was it close to possible for the
second place driver to win.
7 times the winner won by over 200 points, meaning it was a lock
way before the end. 4 times it was over 350.
The highest was 489

Since the chase they have been won by
8, 35, 56, 69, 77.


"Manufactured Drama"...... Isn't it great?
As opposed to a traditional snooze_fest for the final 10 races ????

What is that makes folks like you so opposed to "The Chase" ?? ..... me
thinks it may have something to do with the age old, inherent human problem
of not being able to cope/deal with change. Not to worry .......... you're
not suffering alone - there a literally millions afflicted.
>

Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old   
Mike/Speeed
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Jimmie Johnson killed NASCAR - 10-21-2009 , 05:34 PM



"Chuck Steak" <Chuck_Steak (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
In article "Mike/Speeed" <SpeedracerREMOVE24 (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote:

"Chuck Steak" <Chuck_Steak (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote in message

We can find examples to illustrate either position,
however, the chances are much much greater that there
will be a closer battle WITH the chase.
Past championship races bear that out.

Since the chase started, each title could have been won
by as many as 5 guys, going in to the last race.
In the 20 years prior to that, that scenario never occured,
In fact, only half of them was it close to possible for the
second place driver to win.
7 times the winner won by over 200 points, meaning it was a lock
way before the end. 4 times it was over 350.
The highest was 489

Since the chase they have been won by
8, 35, 56, 69, 77.


"Manufactured Drama"...... Isn't it great?


whatever.

I would have expected better...

Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old   
Chuck Steak
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Jimmie Johnson killed NASCAR - 10-21-2009 , 07:06 PM



In article "Mike/Speeed" <SpeedracerREMOVE24 (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote:

Quote:
"Chuck Steak" <Chuck_Steak (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote in message

We can find examples to illustrate either position,
however, the chances are much much greater that there
will be a closer battle WITH the chase.
Past championship races bear that out.

Since the chase started, each title could have been won
by as many as 5 guys, going in to the last race.
In the 20 years prior to that, that scenario never occured,
In fact, only half of them was it close to possible for the
second place driver to win.
7 times the winner won by over 200 points, meaning it was a lock
way before the end. 4 times it was over 350.
The highest was 489

Since the chase they have been won by
8, 35, 56, 69, 77.

"Manufactured Drama"...... Isn't it great?

whatever.

I would have expected better...

Geez Mike.
I spent 20 minutes doing research for my post,
you give me a 2 word response, and expected "better"??
Sorry.

Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.