![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
| -- Gee willikers, it must be obvious day at Camp Stupid. ($1 to Master Shake) "galloping.moron" <cfsnascar (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote in message news:3FAgc.1357$e4.1147 (AT) newsread2 (DOT) news.pas.earthlink.net... The only two times since 1945 that the other guys decided to fight back was in Viet Nam and in Somalia and our troops got beaten. perhaps you could name one battle that the N. Vietnamese won? |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
The only two times since 1945 that the other guys decided to fight back was in Viet Nam and in Somalia and our troops got beaten. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Daniel" <sabot120mm (AT) diespammersdie (DOT) com> wrote in message news:EKAgc.16506$Hf7.521 (AT) fe2 (DOT) texas.rr.com... -- Gee willikers, it must be obvious day at Camp Stupid. ($1 to Master Shake) "galloping.moron" <cfsnascar (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote in message news:3FAgc.1357$e4.1147 (AT) newsread2 (DOT) news.pas.earthlink.net... The only two times since 1945 that the other guys decided to fight back was in Viet Nam and in Somalia and our troops got beaten. perhaps you could name one battle that the N. Vietnamese won? The Viet Nam War. Viet Nam did not win the war, we just left! |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 19:27:59 GMT, "galloping.moron" cfsnascar (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote: The only two times since 1945 that the other guys decided to fight back was in Viet Nam and in Somalia and our troops got beaten. That is stupid and NOT fact. The FACT is the troops never lost anything, the politicians lost both, if the politicians would have got out of the way, the military would have won them both very easily and quickly! Why would you post something so dumb? |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
"wayne mann" <tpdl (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote in message news km580thor03g8hi5k946sad52dbgtp3qb (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 19:27:59 GMT, "galloping.moron" cfsnascar (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote: The only two times since 1945 that the other guys decided to fight back was in Viet Nam and in Somalia and our troops got beaten. That is stupid and NOT fact. The FACT is the troops never lost anything, the politicians lost both, if the politicians would have got out of the way, the military would have won them both very easily and quickly! Why would you post something so dumb? The politicians were not fighting the battles in Viet Nam and Somalia. Our troops were. And they lost both times. Your ignorance is only exceeded by your stupidity! |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 19:48:52 GMT, "galloping.moron" cfsnascar (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote: "wayne mann" <tpdl (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote in message news km580thor03g8hi5k946sad52dbgtp3qb (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 19:27:59 GMT, "galloping.moron" cfsnascar (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote: The only two times since 1945 that the other guys decided to fight back was in Viet Nam and in Somalia and our troops got beaten. That is stupid and NOT fact. The FACT is the troops never lost anything, the politicians lost both, if the politicians would have got out of the way, the military would have won them both very easily and quickly! Why would you post something so dumb? The politicians were not fighting the battles in Viet Nam and Somalia. Our troops were. And they lost both times. Your ignorance is only exceeded by your stupidity! |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
"wayne mann" <tpdl (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote in message news km580thor03g8hi5k946sad52dbgtp3qb (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 19:27:59 GMT, "galloping.moron" cfsnascar (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote: The only two times since 1945 that the other guys decided to fight back was in Viet Nam and in Somalia and our troops got beaten. That is stupid and NOT fact. The FACT is the troops never lost anything, the politicians lost both, if the politicians would have got out of the way, the military would have won them both very easily and quickly! Why would you post something so dumb? The politicians were not fighting the battles in Viet Nam and Somalia. Our troops were. And they lost both times. Your ignorance is only exceeded by your stupidity! |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
| perhaps you could name one battle that the N. Vietnamese won? |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
"wayne mann" <tpdl (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote in message news:47o5805fli9fi6sv2jusbrjsc38vr9eknr (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 19:48:52 GMT, "galloping.moron" cfsnascar (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote: "wayne mann" <tpdl (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote in message news km580thor03g8hi5k946sad52dbgtp3qb (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 19:27:59 GMT, "galloping.moron" cfsnascar (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote: The only two times since 1945 that the other guys decided to fight back was in Viet Nam and in Somalia and our troops got beaten. That is stupid and NOT fact. The FACT is the troops never lost anything, the politicians lost both, if the politicians would have got out of the way, the military would have won them both very easily and quickly! Why would you post something so dumb? The politicians were not fighting the battles in Viet Nam and Somalia. Our troops were. And they lost both times. Your ignorance is only exceeded by your stupidity! You mean our guys won in Viet Nam and Somalia? They did not run away in disgrace? Rewrite the history books! |
#20
| |||
| |||
|
|
"galloping.moron" <cfsnascar (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote in news:knBgc.20307$A_ 4.20013 (AT) newsread1 (DOT) news.pas.earthlink.net: "wayne mann" <tpdl (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote in message news:47o5805fli9fi6sv2jusbrjsc38vr9eknr (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 19:48:52 GMT, "galloping.moron" cfsnascar (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote: "wayne mann" <tpdl (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote in message news km580thor03g8hi5k946sad52dbgtp3qb (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 19:27:59 GMT, "galloping.moron" cfsnascar (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote: The only two times since 1945 that the other guys decided to fight back was in Viet Nam and in Somalia and our troops got beaten. That is stupid and NOT fact. The FACT is the troops never lost anything, the politicians lost both, if the politicians would have got out of the way, the military would have won them both very easily and quickly! Why would you post something so dumb? The politicians were not fighting the battles in Viet Nam and Somalia. Our troops were. And they lost both times. Your ignorance is only exceeded by your stupidity! You mean our guys won in Viet Nam and Somalia? They did not run away in disgrace? Rewrite the history books! They didn't run away, you tool. The White House tried to run the war, or the troops were too few and inadequately prepared, and the intelligence was way off. ...kinda sounds familiar, though, doesn't it? Isn't it telling that both Kerry and McCain keep pushing for more troops in Iraq? And not to just cut and run? They know because they were real soldiers. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |