 | |
Re: SNL RIPS LIMBAUGH A NEW ONE
Nascar NASCAR and other professional stock car racing (rec.autos.sport.nascar)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
 
| |||
| |||
|
Re: SNL RIPS LIMBAUGH A NEW ONE -
12-29-2004
, 04:21 PM
|
"David Eckard" <fjbeqrqtr (AT) rneguyvax (DOT) arg> wrote in message news:9oDUIVRddqTc-pn2-LZcNOnzkdLwj (AT) localhost (DOT) .. On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:48:32 UTC, "ehollo" <ehollo (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote: and we all know how hard W worked to earn his money. oh, yeah, Daddy gave it to him. This the same bush that invested 1 million in the texas rangers, worked on the staff of the rangers organisation, then sold that share for 12 million? Bush was part of the team that turned that team around. Why everybody thinks that cause daddy has money, the children don't work is beyond me. -- David Eckard I hope you read Lamont's post, just one more belief among those who don't investigate is debunked. |
anything contradicting David's remarks. As a matter of fact, Lamont's post
reinforces most of what David stated. Quite frankly, I was wondering which
side of the argument Lamont was on, cause the article provided seemed to
contradict the notion that "Bush obtained all with no effort."
#102
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Roy Blankenship" <pointblank (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote in message news:EuDAd.1339$JC2.353 (AT) newsread2 (DOT) news.atl.earthlink.net... "David Eckard" <fjbeqrqtr (AT) rneguyvax (DOT) arg> wrote in message news:9oDUIVRddqTc-pn2-LZcNOnzkdLwj (AT) localhost (DOT) .. On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:48:32 UTC, "ehollo" <ehollo (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote: and we all know how hard W worked to earn his money. oh, yeah, Daddy gave it to him. This the same bush that invested 1 million in the texas rangers, worked on the staff of the rangers organisation, then sold that share for 12 million? Bush was part of the team that turned that team around. Why everybody thinks that cause daddy has money, the children don't work is beyond me. -- David Eckard I hope you read Lamont's post, just one more belief among those who don't investigate is debunked. Funny, most of what I read in Lamont's cut-n-paste job didn't suggest anything contradicting David's remarks. As a matter of fact, Lamont's post reinforces most of what David stated. Quite frankly, I was wondering which side of the argument Lamont was on, cause the article provided seemed to contradict the notion that "Bush obtained all with no effort." |
the deal only because of his name and family connections, that Bush used
those connections to secure taxpayer financing of the operation, and
that Bush dishonorably stiffed the city of Arlington to the tune of
seven million dollars. What Bush obtained in the deal was not through
any effort or talent. Bush was born with a silver spoon in his nose and
a bourbon bottle in his mouth and his entire life reflects it.
#103
| |||
| |||
|
|
Patrick wrote: "Roy Blankenship" <pointblank (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote in message news:EuDAd.1339$JC2.353 (AT) newsread2 (DOT) news.atl.earthlink.net... "David Eckard" <fjbeqrqtr (AT) rneguyvax (DOT) arg> wrote in message news:9oDUIVRddqTc-pn2-LZcNOnzkdLwj (AT) localhost (DOT) .. On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:48:32 UTC, "ehollo" <ehollo (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote: and we all know how hard W worked to earn his money. oh, yeah, Daddy gave it to him. This the same bush that invested 1 million in the texas rangers, worked on the staff of the rangers organisation, then sold that share for 12 million? Bush was part of the team that turned that team around. Why everybody thinks that cause daddy has money, the children don't work is beyond me. -- David Eckard I hope you read Lamont's post, just one more belief among those who don't investigate is debunked. Funny, most of what I read in Lamont's cut-n-paste job didn't suggest anything contradicting David's remarks. As a matter of fact, Lamont's post reinforces most of what David stated. Quite frankly, I was wondering which side of the argument Lamont was on, cause the article provided seemed to contradict the notion that "Bush obtained all with no effort." The article quite accurately described that Bush was only offered in on the deal only because of his name and family connections, that Bush used those connections to secure taxpayer financing of the operation, and that Bush dishonorably stiffed the city of Arlington to the tune of seven million dollars. What Bush obtained in the deal was not through any effort or talent. Bush was born with a silver spoon in his nose and a bourbon bottle in his mouth and his entire life reflects it. |
You are a jealous asshole that only wishes you had someone in your
family worth a shit so you could use connections as well. And don't
bother lying by saying you wouldn't.
--
lab~rat >:-)
The less you care, the more it doesn't matter.
#104
| |||
| |||
|
|
Patrick wrote: "Roy Blankenship" <pointblank (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote in message news:EuDAd.1339$JC2.353 (AT) newsread2 (DOT) news.atl.earthlink.net... "David Eckard" <fjbeqrqtr (AT) rneguyvax (DOT) arg> wrote in message news:9oDUIVRddqTc-pn2-LZcNOnzkdLwj (AT) localhost (DOT) .. On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:48:32 UTC, "ehollo" <ehollo (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote: and we all know how hard W worked to earn his money. oh, yeah, Daddy gave it to him. This the same bush that invested 1 million in the texas rangers, worked on the staff of the rangers organisation, then sold that share for 12 million? Bush was part of the team that turned that team around. Why everybody thinks that cause daddy has money, the children don't work is beyond me. -- David Eckard I hope you read Lamont's post, just one more belief among those who don't investigate is debunked. Funny, most of what I read in Lamont's cut-n-paste job didn't suggest anything contradicting David's remarks. As a matter of fact, Lamont's post reinforces most of what David stated. Quite frankly, I was wondering which side of the argument Lamont was on, cause the article provided seemed to contradict the notion that "Bush obtained all with no effort." The article quite accurately described that Bush was only offered in on the deal only because of his name and family connections, that Bush used those connections to secure taxpayer financing of the operation, and that Bush dishonorably stiffed the city of Arlington to the tune of seven million dollars. What Bush obtained in the deal was not through any effort or talent. Bush was born with a silver spoon in his nose and a bourbon bottle in his mouth and his entire life reflects it. |
#105
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:06:01 UTC, Walden O'Dell Walden.O'Dell (AT) DeiboldElection (DOT) Fraud> wrote: Limbaugh once said on his radio program that he was "your epitome of morality of virtue, a man you could totally trust with your wife, your daughter, and even your son in a Motel 6 overnight." I submit that this is claiming to be a moral compass. He harps constantly on "family values" and once touted Bill Bennett's book, "The Moral Compass," on his program. you CAN trust in with your ladies. Taking perscription medicin doesn't put them in jeopardy -- David Eckard ----------------------------------------------------------- Rot13 this address fjbeqrqtr (AT) rneguyvax (DOT) arg Webmaster http://www.billswoodshed.com <- currently unavail Webmaster http://home.earthlink.net/~swordedge ----------------------------------------------------------- |
#106
| |||
| |||
|
| He probably smokes Crack too and shoots up heroin with Ollie North and those |
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.