 | |
Re: For those who can bear to watch...
Nascar NASCAR and other professional stock car racing (rec.autos.sport.nascar)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
 
| |||
| |||
|
Re: For those who can bear to watch... -
10-25-2009
, 12:06 AM
|
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:54:10 -0400, TS02_05champ tonystewart02_05champ (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: A. Jones wrote: On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:51:45 -0400, TS02_05champ tonystewart02_05champ (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: A. Jones wrote: On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 07:45:42 +1100, "Chad" <cbstun (AT) safemail (DOT) com wrote: TS02_05champ wrote: A. Jones wrote: From http://jayski.com/cupnews.htm AJ, I've really had no problem with you except for the Mike Joy incident (thanks for that! <sigh>), but why do you spam this group with your Yahoo group? Why, do you post to this group with copied posts from your Yahoo group? We all know why, to help get new members. I crosspost to foster more insight and discussion; both here and there. You do not have to be a member of the Yahoo group to reply, continue the thread, here. How do you crosspost to Usenet and a Yahoo group? All I've seen, is you coping posts from your Yahoo group, posting them here, and then responding to them. To more groups than just the original, I post "my reply" to what someone else said "to me". I can post my reply to anywhere I want. They're MY replies. In fact, my newsreader will post to both usenet and email at the same time. Huh, go figure. I wonder why that is; why that is possible, an option. In this group, it can look like I'm replying to myself because you see only my half of multiple followups. That does not mean you cannot join in, reply to me in the thread here. You are very welcome to do so. All I'm trying to do is create discussion, get people involved, both here and in my email group. You should not have a problem with that. Why do you think you can tell people what to do in RASN and their own email group? Ya know what, Champ, none of this is any of your goddamn business. Comprende, Mr Busybody? You didn't answer the question. Again, how do you *crosspost* (your words) to Usenet AND a Yahoo group? I very clearly answered the question, and I'm not going to fight with your reading comprehension. You understand what crossposting is or don't. Whether you do is not my problem. |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:06:25 -0400, TS02_05champ tonystewart02_05champ (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: LOL....OK, whatever Alan. It would help you to know the definition of crossposting. Look it up before browbeating me with stupid questions. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:06:25 -0400, TS02_05champ tonystewart02_05champ (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: LOL....OK, whatever Alan. It would help you to know the definition of crossposting. Look it up before browbeating me with stupid questions. |
them to join your group, or some other group, or to promote a website,
or for any other solicitation in any form. Do not use this forum to
promote or drive traffic, page hits, to any other discussion group or
website.
When posting an article from an outside, different, website or
discussion forum, the ENTIRE ARTICLE MUST BE INCLUDED along with its
page hyperlink. Do not post the page link alone, by itself. Both the
ENTIRE article and its page hyperlink must be present. DO NOT USE THIS
GROUP TO DRIVE TRAFFIC TO OTHER WEBSITES.
Thank you,
Alan Jones, ajones (AT) intrtek (DOT) com
Classic!
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
"A. Jones" <ajones (AT) intrtek (DOT) com> wrote in message news:tqc7e55fscs6htj5gqhgdd1nh3ifaikvkn (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:55:12 -0500, BlueBrooke BlueBrooke (AT) invalid (DOT) invalid> wrote: On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:23:58 -0400, A. Jones <ajones (AT) intrtek (DOT) com wrote: On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:47:59 -0500, BlueBrooke BlueBrooke (AT) invalid (DOT) invalid> wrote: On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 17:42:52 -0400, "armpit" <armarmpitpit (AT) yahoo (DOT) com wrote: His group is near failure, and he can't stop the bleeding. Probably because they don't like their Yahoo! group messages being posted to Usenet. Seems to me if they wanted to post to Usenet, they could do it themselves. Is that what they signed up for? Frankly, I'm too lazy to check the group to see if there was any disclosure on that issue. I'm not able to read this group as much as I'd like, and mostly don't post, so I'm not up on what the "sides" are, but this behavior would sure help me pick one if I had to. It's outrageous and, I believe, in some places illegal as well. OUTRAGEOUS and ILLEGAL in SOME places. LOL, how interesting I am to so many. "Interesting" is not a word I would use to describe you. I did take a look at the group page and notice it's a private group. Members, therefore, would have an expectation that their messages would be available to the group members only. I see no notice to potential members that you will be posting their group messages on Usenet. Not to mention the fact that you're posting their email addresses for spammers to harvest. So, I wouldn't describe you as a "great-all-around-nice-guy," either. "Stupid" came to mind, but you know exactly what you're doing. You just don't care. You might want to, however, take a peek at Yahoo!'s terms of service, privacy and acceptable use policies. It would really be too bad if your group was shut-down for violating those. Do you often spend your spare time with people who are not interesting? You're very involved in my business for not being interested. You seem to be very concerned with the details of my life. Indeed, you have a lot to say; a lot to tell me. I find that interesting. Oh bullshit. She said she wouldn't use the term "interesting" to describe you. That doesn't mean you aren't interesting, it just means that isn't one of your strong points. Maybe I should post some links to some of your more classic threads, like the Ironhead tribute thread. Maybe that would help her find the proper adjectives to descrbe you, eh? |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
armpit wrote: "A. Jones" <ajones (AT) intrtek (DOT) com> wrote in message news:tqc7e55fscs6htj5gqhgdd1nh3ifaikvkn (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:55:12 -0500, BlueBrooke BlueBrooke (AT) invalid (DOT) invalid> wrote: On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:23:58 -0400, A. Jones <ajones (AT) intrtek (DOT) com wrote: On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:47:59 -0500, BlueBrooke BlueBrooke (AT) invalid (DOT) invalid> wrote: On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 17:42:52 -0400, "armpit" <armarmpitpit (AT) yahoo (DOT) com wrote: His group is near failure, and he can't stop the bleeding. Probably because they don't like their Yahoo! group messages being posted to Usenet. Seems to me if they wanted to post to Usenet, they could do it themselves. Is that what they signed up for? Frankly, I'm too lazy to check the group to see if there was any disclosure on that issue. I'm not able to read this group as much as I'd like, and mostly don't post, so I'm not up on what the "sides" are, but this behavior would sure help me pick one if I had to. It's outrageous and, I believe, in some places illegal as well. OUTRAGEOUS and ILLEGAL in SOME places. LOL, how interesting I am to so many. "Interesting" is not a word I would use to describe you. I did take a look at the group page and notice it's a private group. Members, therefore, would have an expectation that their messages would be available to the group members only. I see no notice to potential members that you will be posting their group messages on Usenet. Not to mention the fact that you're posting their email addresses for spammers to harvest. So, I wouldn't describe you as a "great-all-around-nice-guy," either. "Stupid" came to mind, but you know exactly what you're doing. You just don't care. You might want to, however, take a peek at Yahoo!'s terms of service, privacy and acceptable use policies. It would really be too bad if your group was shut-down for violating those. Do you often spend your spare time with people who are not interesting? You're very involved in my business for not being interested. You seem to be very concerned with the details of my life. Indeed, you have a lot to say; a lot to tell me. I find that interesting. Oh bullshit. She said she wouldn't use the term "interesting" to describe you. That doesn't mean you aren't interesting, it just means that isn't one of your strong points. Maybe I should post some links to some of your more classic threads, like the Ironhead tribute thread. Maybe that would help her find the proper adjectives to descrbe you, eh? Oh, please do. I missed those. |
Googling that nick in Google groups advance search will yield a treasure
trove of Janalisms.
Here's a couple of 'em: http://tinyurl.com/Janal-truths-0001
http://tinyurl.com/Janal-truths-0002
And who could forget the "Trollville" thread?
http://tinyurl.com/Janal-truths-0003
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:06:25 -0400, TS02_05champ tonystewart02_05champ (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: LOL....OK, whatever Alan. It would help you to know the definition of crossposting. Look it up before browbeating me with stupid questions. |
responses along with your own, I am perfectly entitled to reply directly to
them, by email if necessary.
So please continue to crosspost messages from your group. I'm sure the
members won't mind some unsolicited responses from someone like me, right?
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.