![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Thu, 02 Oct 03 10:05:35 GMT, lparker (AT) NOSPAMemory (DOT) edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: In article <s2cmnvc00f3e4sfld0fr6anm03imbkoohu (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, wayne mann <tpdl (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote: On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 13:18:00 GMT, Alan Jones <me (AT) alanjones (DOT) us> wrote: Vincent Foster, the former White House deputy counsel to the Clintons who committed suicide, I dare anyone to present proof that he committed suicide as claimed. \\/ayne //\ann Then I suggest you read Ken Starr's report. Lloyd, I have read it, and a hell of a lot more, as you damed well know, and I have challenged you several tiems to meet me at any appropriate newsgroup of your choice and we would discuss it, but you have always ran and hid and ignore that. The fact is I have read virtually everything published about the Foster death including about 50 volumes of Senate investigation material, and every report written about it. I repeat, I DARE anyone, including Lloyd to post proof right here that he committed suicide as claimed! So now Lloyd, either put up or shut up! And just a a teaser: The FBI tells us that no blood was found on Foster's eyeglasses. (1) Ken Starr quotes Dr. Lee telling us that bloodstains visible to the naked eye were found on Foster's eyeglasses. (2) Both official findings cannot be correct. It is not possible to have visible bloodstains on the eyeglasses and also have no blood found on the eyeglasses. One of the findings is wrong and casts doubt on the other findings. If the FBI was wrong, all of their findings in the Foster case are suspect. If Dr. Lee was wrong, all of his findings are suspect and Starr must explain why he did not reconcile Lee's findings with the prior investigative record. (1) Fiske, Exhibit 1, page 10, item Q3. (2) Starr, page 57. Also there was exploded gun powder from TWO different bullets on the glasses, yet the gun had one unfired bullet and one fired bullet in it. The gun powder from the second bullet was not from that gun. How do you explain that? BTW....... Did you know that the first thing Mrs. Foster said to the Police when told only that her husband was dead, was ask, "did he [Foster] put the gun in his own mouth"? How do you explain that. How did she know he had been shot? And assuming she saw that he was shot in her crystal ball, why did she ask if he put the gun in his own mouth? Who did she think might have done it? (Page 21-Senate Report 103-433) Explain these to us Lloyd! \\/ayne //\ann |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
| They killed Vince Foster but let Monica Lewinsky live? The right-wing conspiracists probably think Vince knew what was in Area 51. |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
They killed Vince Foster but let Monica Lewinsky live? |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
| They killed Vince Foster but let Monica Lewinsky live? Who killed him, Ms. G? |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Ms.Goodwrench" <msgoodwrench29DEL (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: They killed Vince Foster but let Monica Lewinsky live? The right-wing conspiracists probably think Vince knew what was in Area 51. |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 3 Oct 2003 13:08:06 GMT, "Ms.Goodwrench" msgoodwrench29DEL (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: They killed Vince Foster but let Monica Lewinsky live? Who killed him, Ms. G? |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <0o0pnv01nouhesldgme39dicgm16lg291l (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, wayne mann <tpdl (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote: On Thu, 02 Oct 03 10:05:35 GMT, lparker (AT) NOSPAMemory (DOT) edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: In article <s2cmnvc00f3e4sfld0fr6anm03imbkoohu (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, wayne mann <tpdl (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote: On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 13:18:00 GMT, Alan Jones <me (AT) alanjones (DOT) us> wrote: Vincent Foster, the former White House deputy counsel to the Clintons who committed suicide, I dare anyone to present proof that he committed suicide as claimed. \\/ayne //\ann Then I suggest you read Ken Starr's report. Lloyd, I have read it, and a hell of a lot more, as you damed well know, and I have challenged you several tiems to meet me at any appropriate newsgroup of your choice and we would discuss it, but you have always ran and hid and ignore that. The fact is I have read virtually everything published about the Foster death including about 50 volumes of Senate investigation material, and every report written about it. I repeat, I DARE anyone, including Lloyd to post proof right here that he committed suicide as claimed! So now Lloyd, either put up or shut up! And just a a teaser: The FBI tells us that no blood was found on Foster's eyeglasses. (1) Ken Starr quotes Dr. Lee telling us that bloodstains visible to the naked eye were found on Foster's eyeglasses. (2) Both official findings cannot be correct. It is not possible to have visible bloodstains on the eyeglasses and also have no blood found on the eyeglasses. One of the findings is wrong and casts doubt on the other findings. If the FBI was wrong, all of their findings in the Foster case are suspect. If Dr. Lee was wrong, all of his findings are suspect and Starr must explain why he did not reconcile Lee's findings with the prior investigative record. (1) Fiske, Exhibit 1, page 10, item Q3. (2) Starr, page 57. Also there was exploded gun powder from TWO different bullets on the glasses, yet the gun had one unfired bullet and one fired bullet in it. The gun powder from the second bullet was not from that gun. How do you explain that? BTW....... Did you know that the first thing Mrs. Foster said to the Police when told only that her husband was dead, was ask, "did he [Foster] put the gun in his own mouth"? How do you explain that. How did she know he had been shot? And assuming she saw that he was shot in her crystal ball, why did she ask if he put the gun in his own mouth? Who did she think might have done it? (Page 21-Senate Report 103-433) Explain these to us Lloyd! \\/ayne //\ann Explain to me how you got all these "facts" that are odds with the report a Republican special prosecutor found. |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 3 Oct 2003 13:08:06 GMT, "Ms.Goodwrench" msgoodwrench29DEL (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: They killed Vince Foster but let Monica Lewinsky live? Who killed him, Ms. G? |
#20
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 03 Oct 03 13:48:24 GMT, lparker (AT) NOSPAMemory (DOT) edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: In article <0o0pnv01nouhesldgme39dicgm16lg291l (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, wayne mann <tpdl (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote: On Thu, 02 Oct 03 10:05:35 GMT, lparker (AT) NOSPAMemory (DOT) edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: In article <s2cmnvc00f3e4sfld0fr6anm03imbkoohu (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, wayne mann <tpdl (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote: On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 13:18:00 GMT, Alan Jones <me (AT) alanjones (DOT) us> wrote: Vincent Foster, the former White House deputy counsel to the Clintons who committed suicide, I dare anyone to present proof that he committed suicide as claimed. \\/ayne //\ann Then I suggest you read Ken Starr's report. Lloyd, I have read it, and a hell of a lot more, as you damed well know, and I have challenged you several tiems to meet me at any appropriate newsgroup of your choice and we would discuss it, but you have always ran and hid and ignore that. The fact is I have read virtually everything published about the Foster death including about 50 volumes of Senate investigation material, and every report written about it. I repeat, I DARE anyone, including Lloyd to post proof right here that he committed suicide as claimed! So now Lloyd, either put up or shut up! And just a a teaser: The FBI tells us that no blood was found on Foster's eyeglasses. (1) Ken Starr quotes Dr. Lee telling us that bloodstains visible to the naked eye were found on Foster's eyeglasses. (2) Both official findings cannot be correct. It is not possible to have visible bloodstains on the eyeglasses and also have no blood found on the eyeglasses. One of the findings is wrong and casts doubt on the other findings. If the FBI was wrong, all of their findings in the Foster case are suspect. If Dr. Lee was wrong, all of his findings are suspect and Starr must explain why he did not reconcile Lee's findings with the prior investigative record. (1) Fiske, Exhibit 1, page 10, item Q3. (2) Starr, page 57. Also there was exploded gun powder from TWO different bullets on the glasses, yet the gun had one unfired bullet and one fired bullet in it. The gun powder from the second bullet was not from that gun. How do you explain that? BTW....... Did you know that the first thing Mrs. Foster said to the Police when told only that her husband was dead, was ask, "did he [Foster] put the gun in his own mouth"? How do you explain that. How did she know he had been shot? And assuming she saw that he was shot in her crystal ball, why did she ask if he put the gun in his own mouth? Who did she think might have done it? (Page 21-Senate Report 103-433) Explain these to us Lloyd! \\/ayne //\ann Explain to me how you got all these "facts" that are odds with the report a Republican special prosecutor found. Lloyd, I gave cites for them from the official records. Stop asking stupid questions and respond to what has been presented or run and hide, but don;t try to play these stupid, childish, immature games with me, I won't play. Now I repeat, "Explain these to us Lloyd!" \\/ayne //\ann No, I want you to tell us where YOU got the alleged info. I know you didn't |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |