![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Mark Cook" <mcook (AT) prodigy (DOT) net> wrote in message news:MYgqf.4235$fO5.1961 (AT) newssvr33 (DOT) news.prodigy.com... Once force is applied to a tire, it "flexes", and then returns back to it's initial "shape". That is a spring. But armpit is correct in the regard that friction also contributes to shock absorption; and there is a (small) frictional component to the flexing action of a tire (independent of traction, or at least the action of the contact patch with the pavement). Go back a couple of decades, before the current accumulator type shock absorbers and you will find that they used "friction" shocks. |
|
Carey in Manvel |
#102
| |||
| |||
|
|
Go back a couple of decades, before the current accumulator type shock absorbers and you will find that they used "friction" shocks. Carey in Manvel |
#103
| |||
| |||
|
|
Geez, Carey, I know time flies by all of us wicked fast, but not THAT fast!! I think Quickest Maximus used friction shocks on his chariot! Okay, more than a couple of decades ago, but not much more. Old Indy cars |
#104
| |||
| |||
|
|
"armpit" <udontneedit (AT) myemail (DOT) addy> wrote in message news:aofqf.15356$Qa1.9365 (AT) bignews1 (DOT) bellsouth.net... "Chuck Steak" <Chuck_Steak (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote in message news:YOWdnbeSUJn45jTeRVn-vw (AT) rcn (DOT) net... In article <KLeqf.177769$qk4.92804 (AT) bgtnsc05-news (DOT) ops.worldnet.att.net>, snip This is the main point that I think some are missing. I don't think there is an argument about tire pressure having an effect on both shock and spring, but you cannot use an example of a tire with 3# of air, and a tire with 50# of air as your basis for comparison. Today, these guys are adjusting air pressure in 1/4# increments. That has, for all practical purposes, no effect on ride height, shock dampening, or 'total spring rate' as some like to call it. It is REAL, REAL small... I agree that shock absorption rates are not affected appreciably by tire pressure changes. I do think that the rebound rate of the tire is a significant part of the total change in handling from changing tire pressure. Been lurking thru this thread and b'leeve these last two posts get to the crux of it. The current radials, with their thin side walls, have led to the use of very small adjustment increments in psi. Some slight 'spring rate' change results on that corner of the car and another key point, I b'leeve, is the change in size of the contact patch...affecting grip. -- Tom in Bristol |
#105
| |||||
| |||||
|
|
Been lurking thru this thread and b'leeve these last two posts get to the crux of it. |
|
The current radials, with their thin side walls, have led to the use of very small adjustment increments in psi. |
|
Some slight 'spring rate' change results on that corner of the car... |
|
and another key point, I b'leeve, is the change in size of the contact patch...affecting grip. |
|
See how fast things get sorted out once Janal is out of the way? He clearly lacked the technical knowledge to make his point, and just kept blubbering on about brick walls when he was clearly the one who had reached his limit. To Janal: Stick to your brand of "journalism" and leave the technical discussions to those that actually have some knowledge about the subject that goes beyond what you see & hear on teevee. |

#106
| |||
| |||
|
I'm done with the thread. I hope everyone has a Merry Christmas. ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |